Advertisement

Introduction

  • Sophie Williams
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter outlines the purpose and the structure of the book. It highlights the wealth of literature on nations and nationalism and comparative dearth of scholarship on national identity, and outlines the need for an interdisciplinary, qualitative analysis of the phenomenon of national identity in a ‘stateless nation’ context. It details the structure and central themes of the subsequent chapter, from literature review, methodology and data analysis framework, case selection, empirical analysis and concluding remarks. It further identifies the innovative features of the research, showcasing its original contribution to the state of the art of understanding national identity and its politicisation in both a broader context and that specific to Wales and the Basque Country.

References

  1. Balsom, Denis, ‘The Three Wales Model’, in The National Question Again: Welsh Political Identity in the 1980s by John Osmond, ed. (Llandysul: Gomer, 1985), 1–13.Google Scholar
  2. Barth, Frederick, ed., Ethnic Groups and Boundaries (Boston: Little, Brown, 1969).Google Scholar
  3. Billig, Michael, Banal Nationalism (London: Sage, 1995).Google Scholar
  4. Bowie, Fiona, ‘Wales from Within: Conflicting Interpretations of Welsh Identity’, in Inside European Identities by Sharon Macdonald, ed. (Providence, RI and Oxford: Berg, 1993).Google Scholar
  5. Bradbury, Jonathan and Andrews, Rhys, ‘State Devolution and National Identity: Continuity and Change in the Politics of Britshness and Welshness in Wales’, Parliamentary Affairs, 3.2 (2010), 229–249.Google Scholar
  6. Brass, Paul, ed., Ethnic Groups and the State (London and Sydney: Croom Helm, 1985).Google Scholar
  7. Brass, Paul R., Ethnicity and Nationalism: Theory and Comparison (London: Sage, 1991).Google Scholar
  8. Bryman, Alan, Social Research Methods (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
  9. Cassell, Catherine and Symon, Gillian, eds., Qualitative Methods in Organisational Research: A Practical Guide (London: Sage, 1994).Google Scholar
  10. Day, Graham and Thompson, Andrew, Theorising Nationalism (Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004).Google Scholar
  11. Fearon, James D. and Laitin, David D., ‘Violence and the Social Construction of Ethnic Identity’, International Organisation, 54.4 (2000), 845–877.Google Scholar
  12. Fenton, Steve, ‘Indifference Towards National Identity: What Young Adults Think About Being English and British’, Nations and Nationalism, 13.2 (2007), 321–339.Google Scholar
  13. Jenkins, Richard, Social Identity (London and New York: Routledge, 2008).Google Scholar
  14. Kamberlis, George and Dimitriadis, Greg, Focus Groups: From Structured Interviews to Collective Conversations (London and New York: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
  15. Kitzinger, Jenny, ‘Qualitative Research: Introducing Focus Groups’, British Medical Journal, 311 (1995), 299–302.Google Scholar
  16. Liamputtong, Pranne, Focus Group Methodology: Principles and Practice (London: Sage, 2011).Google Scholar
  17. Mason, Jennifer, Qualitative Researching (London: Sage, 2002).Google Scholar
  18. McCrone, David, The Sociology of Nationalism (London and New York: Routledge, 1998).Google Scholar
  19. Munday, Jennie, ‘Identity in Focus: The Use of Focus Groups to Study the Construction of Collective Identity’, Sociology, 40.1 (2006), 85–105.Google Scholar
  20. Obradović-Wochnick, Jelena, ‘The Silent Dilemma of Transitional Justice: Silencing and Coming to Terms with the Past in Serbia’, The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 7.2 (2013), 328–347.Google Scholar
  21. Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J., Dickinson, Wendy B., Leech, Nancy L., and Zoran, Annemarie, ‘Toward More Rigour in Focus Group Research: A New Framework for Collecting and Analysing Focus Group Data’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8.3 (2009), 1–21.Google Scholar
  22. Parekh, Bhikhu, ‘The Concept of National Identity’, New Community, 21.2 (1995), 255–268.Google Scholar
  23. Smithson, Janet, ‘Using and Analysing Focus Groups: Limitations and Possibilities’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3.2 (2000), 103–119.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sophie Williams
    • 1
  1. 1.Office for National StatisticsNewportWales

Personalised recommendations