Advertisement

Auditory Displays for Take-Over in Semi-automated Vehicles

  • Erin Richie
  • Thomas Offer-Westort
  • Raghavendran Shankar
  • Myounghoon Jeon
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10917)

Abstract

With the field of automated vehicles rapidly growing comes the question of how we communicate to a driver that they need to take over in emergency or other urgent situations. Auditory displays can enhance communications between the driver and the automated vehicle. After a review of related literature, guidelines for audio displays were determined and a preliminary pilot experiment was conducted to further understand how drivers’ reaction time to urgent situations would vary based on the type of sound they were alerted with. Results suggest that speech may give the quickest response time and a word choice may matter if using a spearcon. This paper is expected to contribute to designing further research studies for take-over displays in the automated vehicle.

Keywords

Auditory displays Automated vehicles Take-over 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant (code 17TLRP-B131486-01) from Transportation and Logistics R&D Program funded by Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korean government.

References

  1. 1.
    Wickens, C.D.: Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 3(2), 159–177 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Woodworth, R.S., Schlosberg, H.: Experimental Psychology. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York (1965)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Colavita, F.B.: Human sensory dominance. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 16(2), 409–412 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gaver, W.W.: Auditory icons: using sound in computer interfaces. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2, 167–177 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blattner, M.M., Sumikawa, D.A., Greenberg, R.M.: Earcons and icons: their structure and common design principles. Hum. Comput. Interact. 4, 11–44 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Walker, B.N., Lindsay, J., Nance, A., Nakano, Y., Palladino, D.K., Dingler, T., Jeon, M.: Spearcons (speech-based earcons) improve navigation performance in advanced auditory menus. Hum. Factors 55(1), 157–182 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wogalter, M.S., Conzola, V.C., Smith-Jackson, T.L.: Based guidelines for warning design and evaluation. Appl. Ergon. 33(3), 219–230 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nees, M.A., Walker, B.N.: Auditory displays for in-vehicle technologies. Rev. Hum. Factors Ergon. 7(1), 58–99 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McKeown, D.: Candidates for within-vehicle auditory displays. Georgia Institute of Technology (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hellier, E., Edworthy, J.: On using psychophysical techniques to achieve urgency mapping in auditory warnings. Appl. Ergon. 30(2), 167–171 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hester, M., Lee, K., Dyre, B.P.: “Driver Take Over”: a preliminary exploration of driver trust and performance in autonomous vehicles. In: Proceedings of the International Annual Meeting of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Graham, R.: Use of auditory icons as emergency warnings: evaluation within a vehicle collision avoidance application. Ergonomics 42(9), 1233–1248 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moskovitch, Y., Jeon, M., Walker, B.N.: Enhanced auditory menu cues on a mobile phone improve time-shared performance of a driving-like dual task. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (HFES 2010), San Francisco, 27 September–1 October 2010, pp. 1321–1325 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jeon, M., Davison, B., Wilson, J., Nees, M., Walker, B.N.: Enhanced auditory menu cues improve dual task performance and are preferred with in-vehicle technologies. In: The 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI 2009), pp. 91–98. ACM Press, Essen, September 2009Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee, J.D., Gore, B.F., Campbell, J.L.: Display alternatives for in-vehicle warning and sign information: message style, location, and modality. Transp. Hum. Factors 1(4), 347–375 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mohebbi, R., Gray, R., Tan, H.Z.: Driver reaction time to tactile and auditory rear-end collision warnings while talking on a cell phone. Hum. Factors 51(1), 102–110 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erin Richie
    • 1
  • Thomas Offer-Westort
    • 1
  • Raghavendran Shankar
    • 1
  • Myounghoon Jeon
    • 1
  1. 1.Michigan Technological UniversityHoughtonUSA

Personalised recommendations