Advertisement

Modelling the Process of Controlling an Automated Steering Maneuver

  • Luis KalbEmail author
  • Klaus Bengler
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10917)

Abstract

Automated steering maneuvers have the potential to further reduce collisions in automobile traffic. High torques on the steering wheel and steer-by-wire are two concepts to prevent unwanted interference by the human driver during such maneuvers. Yet both methods lack controllability required by regulations in case of a false alarm, which is required by regulations. This paper tackles the problem of controllability by structuring the process of overriding a maneuver. Six chronological elements are presented which open up new specific research areas each. Research so far is sorted into this process and possible future research is evaluated for each element.

Keywords

Controllability Automated driving Automated steering maneuvers 

References

  1. 1.
    SAE J3016: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles. http://standards.sae.org/j3016_201609/
  2. 2.
    Keller, C.G., Dang, T., Fritz, H., Joos, A., Rabe, C., Gavrila, D.M.: Active pedestrian safety by automatic braking and evasive steering. Trans. Intell. Transport. Sys. 12(4), 1292–1304 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2011.2158424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Winner, H.: Grundlagen von Frontkollisionsschutzsystemen. In: Winner, H., Hakuli, S., Lotz, F., Singer, C. (eds.) Handbuch Fahrerassistenzsysteme. A, pp. 893–912. Springer, Wiesbaden (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05734-3_47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    United Nations Economic Commission for Europe: Convention on Road Traffic, Version 1993 with Amendments in 2006. http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/conventn/Conv_road_traffic_EN.pdf
  5. 5.
    Brockmann, M.: Code of Practice for the Design and Evaluation of ADAS (2009). http://www.acea.be/uploads/publications/20090831_Code_of_Practice_ADAS.pdf
  6. 6.
    Bender, E., Landau, K., Bruder, R.: Driver reactions in response to automatic obstacle avoiding manoeuvres. In: 16th World Congress on Ergonomics (IEA) (2006). http://tubiblio.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/43003/
  7. 7.
    Sieber, M., Siedersberger, K.H., Siegel, A., Färber, B.: Automatic emergency steering with distracted drivers: effects of intervention design. In: IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 2040–2045 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2015.330
  8. 8.
    Fricke, N., Griesche, S., Schieben, A., Hesse, T., Baumann, M.: Driver behavior following an automatic steering intervention. Accid. Anal. Prev. 83(Supplement C), 190–196 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schneider, N., Purucker, C., Neukum, A.: Comparison of steering interventions in time-critical scenarios. Procedia Manuf. 3(Supplement C), 3107–3114 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hesse, T., Schieben, A., Heesen, M., Dziennus, M., Griesche, S., Köster, F.: Interaction design for automation initiated steering manoeuvres for collision avoidance. In: 6. Tagung Fahrerassistenzsysteme, München (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schieben, A., Griesche, S., Hesse, T., Fricke, N., Baumann, M.: Evaluation of three different interaction designs for an automatic steering intervention. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 27, 238–251 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.06.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    ISO 17287: Road vehicles – Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems – procedure for assessing suitability for use while driving (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schneider, N., Berg, G., Paradies, S., Zahn, P., Huesmann, A., Neukum, A.: Designing emergency steering and evasion assist to enhance safety in use and controllability. In: Bengler, K., Drüke, J., Hoffmann, S., Manstetten, D., Neukum, A. (eds.) UR:BAN Human Factors in Traffic. A, pp. 479–494. Springer, Wiesbaden (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15418-9_28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dang, T., Desens, J., Franke, U., Gavrila, D., Schäfers, L., Ziegler, W.: Steering and evasion assist. In: Eskandarian, A. (ed.) Handbook of Intelligent Vehicles, pp. 759–782. Springer, London (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-085-4_29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ploch, C.J., Bae, J.H., Ju, W., Cutkosky, M.: Haptic skin stretch on a steering wheel for displaying preview information in autonomous cars. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 60–65 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2016.7759035
  16. 16.
    Müller, C., Siedersberger, K.-H., Färber, B., Popp, M.: Aktive Aufbauneigung als Rückmeldekanal bei Querführungsassistenz über entkoppelte Lenkaktorik. Forschung im Ingenieurwesen 81(1), 41–55 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair of ErgonomicsTechnical University of MunichGarchingGermany

Personalised recommendations