Advertisement

The Role of Standardization for Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) and the Design of Safe and Healthy Human-Computer Interaction (HCI)

  • Michael Bretschneider-Hagemes
  • Sebastian Korfmacher
  • Katharina von Rymon Lipinski
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10917)

Abstract

The relationship between standardization and HCI design often appears contradictory to those involved: on the one hand, standardization, presumed to be rigid and conservative; on the other, the HCI community, presumed to be trendy and innovative. However, HCI design and the resulting products benefit from the application of standards. The consideration of standards is often the essential key to smooth market access – especially in the field of safety and security. It also supports task-oriented, user-optimized and health-friendly design of HCI – ISO 9241 “Ergonomics of human-system interaction” exemplifies this connection.

The conference contribution gives insights into the field of standardization and provides an overview of the relationship between standardization, occupational safety and health (OSH) and HCI. The process of standards development and participation in standardization is presented in the context of the legal framework – exemplified by the European system. In addition, the reference to occupational health and safety and the aspects of digitalization are explained by examples.

Keywords

Digitalization of work Safety Healthy workplace Standardization 

References

  1. 1.
    Gemeinsamer Standpunkt (GDS) des Bundesministers für Arbeit und Sozialordnung, der obersten Arbeitsschutzbehörden der Länder, der Träger der gesetzlichen Unfallversicherungen, der Sozialpartner sowie des DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. zur Normung im Bereich der auf Artikel 118a des EWG-Vertrags gestützten Richtlinien. In: Bundesarbeitsblatt 1/1993, pp. 37–39. (Also: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales, Grundsatzpapier zur Rolle der Normung im betrieblichen Arbeitsschutz – announcement by BMAS, 24 November 2014, GMBl 2015, no. 1, p. 2)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    DGUV: DGUV-Information 215-450, p. 7. Software Ergonomie, Berlin (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ISO 9241-110: Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction – Part 110: Dialogue Principles (ISO 9241-110:2006), German Version EN ISO 9241-110:2006Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ISO 9241-210: Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction – Part 210: Human-Centred Design for Interactive Systems (ISO 9241-210:2010), German Version EN ISO 9241-210:2010Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Manzei, C., Schleupner, L., Heinze, R. (eds.): Industrie 4.0 im internationalen Kontext, p. 23 f (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weiser, M.: The Computer for the 21st Century. Sci. Am. (1991)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    BSI-Veröffentlichungen zur Cyber-Sicherheit – Industrial Control System Security Top 10 Bedrohungen und Gegenmaßnahmen (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    KANBrief, April 2017Google Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    KAN Website. www.kan.de

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Bretschneider-Hagemes
    • 1
  • Sebastian Korfmacher
    • 1
  • Katharina von Rymon Lipinski
    • 1
  1. 1.Commission for Occupational Health and Safety and Standardization (KAN)Sankt AugustinGermany

Personalised recommendations