Advertisement

Assessment of Cerebrovascular Reactivity

  • Fridon Todua
  • Dudana Gachechiladze
Chapter

Abstract

Such factors as cerebrovascular reserve, condition of cardiac hemodynamics, systemic blood pressure, and rheological parameters of blood have a big influence on cerebral circulation.

References

  1. Aaslid R, Lindergaard KF, Sorteberg W, Nornes H (1989) Cerebral autoregulation dynamics in humans. Stroke 20:45–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ainslie PN, Duffin J (2009) Integration of cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity and chemoreflex control of breathing: mechanisms of regulation, measurement, and interpretation. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 296(5):R1473–R1495CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anzola GP, Gasparotti R, Magoni M et al (1995) Transcranial Doppler sonography and magnetic resonance angiography in the assessment of collateral hemispheric flow in patients with carotid artery disease. Stroke 26:214–217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Apruzzese A, Silvestrini M, Floris R et al (2001) Cerebral hemodynamics in asymptomatic patients with internal carotid artery occlusion: a dynamic susceptibility contrast MR and transcranial Doppler study. AJNR 22:1062–1067PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Aries MJH, Elting Jan W, De Keyser J et al (2010) Cerebral autoregulation in stroke a review of transcranial Doppler studies. Stroke 41:2697–2704CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bluth EI (1997) Evaluation and characterisation of carotid plaque. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 18(1):57–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bornstein N et al (2003) The value of a combined TCD and the Diamox test in assessing intracerebral hemodynamics. Stroke (Russia) 9:27–29Google Scholar
  8. Chimowit M et al (1998) Evaluation of intracranial and extracranial carotid artery steno-occlusive disease. Neurology 104(43):353–357Google Scholar
  9. Cooperberg EB (1997) Modern indications for carotid endarterectomy. Angiol Vasc Surg 2:63–67 (In Russian)Google Scholar
  10. Dahl A, Russell D (1994) Cerebral vasoreactivity in unilateral carotid artery disease. Stroke 25:621–626CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Furst H et al (1994) Patterns of cerebrovascular reactivity in patients with unilateral asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 25:1193–1200CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gachechiladze D, Todua F, Beraia M (2017) Brain focal impairment and hemodynamic parameters in patients with unilateral high-grade Internal carotid artery (ICA) changes. Neurosonol Cereb Hemodyn 13(1):12–22Google Scholar
  13. Kapoor K, Singh B, Dewan LI (2008) Variations in the configuration of the circle of Willis. Anat Sci Int 83:96–106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kluytmans M, van der Grong J et al (1999) Cerebral hemodynamics in relation to patterns of collateral flow. Stroke 30:14329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liebiskind D (2003) Collateral circulation. Stroke 34:2279–2284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maeda M, Yuh VVT et al (1999) Severe occlusive carotid artery disease: hemodynamic assessment by MR perfusion imaging in symptomatic patients. AJNR 20:43–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Neff A et al (2000) Collateral pathways in ICA unilateral occlusion. MRA study. Eur Radiol suppl(1):96Google Scholar
  18. Nicolau C, Giliblow K et al (2001) Effect of ICA occlusion on vertebral artery blood flow. J Ultrasound Med 20:105–111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Nikitin Yu M, Trukhanov A (2004) Ultrasound Doppler diagnostics in the clinic. Ivanovo. p. 496Google Scholar
  20. Panerai RB (2009) Transcranial Doppler for evaluation of cerebral autoregulation. Clin Auton Res 19:197–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Riggs HE, Rupp C (1963) Variation in form of circle of Willis. The relation of the variations to collateral circulation: anatomic analysis. Arch Neurol 8:24–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ringelstein EB, Sieves C et al (1988) Noninvasive assessment of CO2-induced cerebral vasomotor response in normal individuals and patients with ICA occlusions. Stroke 19:963–972CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ringelstein E, Weckesser M, Weckesser S et al (1994) Cerebral vasomotor reactivity is significantly reduced in low-flow as compared to thromboembolic infarctions: the key role of the circle of Willis. J Neurol Sci 121(1):103–109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Schöning M, Walter J, Scheel P (1994) Estimation of cerebral blood flow through color duplex sonography of the carotid and vertebral arteries in healthy adults. Stroke 25:17–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Valdueza J, Schreiber S, Roehl JE, Klingebiel R (2008) Neurosonology and neuroimaging of stroke. Thieme, Stuttgart, p 383Google Scholar
  26. Widder B, Kleiser B et al (1994) Course of cerebrovascular reactivity in patients with carotid artery occlusions. Stroke 25(10):1963–1967CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wijnhoud AD, Koudstaal PJ, Dippel DW (2006) Relationships of transcranial blood flow Doppler parameters with major vascular risk factors: TCD study in patients with a recent TIA or nondisabling ischemic stroke. J Clin Ultrasound 34(2):70–76CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Willie CK, Colino FL, Bailey DM et al (2011) Utility of transcranial Doppler ultrasound for the integrative assessment of cerebrovascular function. J Neurosci Methods 196(2):221–237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Yonas H et al (1993) Evaluation of cerebral perfusion reserve in patients with carotid artery stenosis. J Neurosurg 79:483–489CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Yoo AJ, Barak ER, Copen WA et al (2010) Combining acute diffusion-weighted imaging and mean transmit time lesion volumes with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score improves the prediction of acute stroke -outcome. Stroke 41(8):1728–1735CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fridon Todua
    • 1
  • Dudana Gachechiladze
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyNational Academy of Sciences of Georgia, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, I. Javakhishili Tbilisi State UniversityTbilisiGeorgia
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyProgramme of Caucasus UniversityTbilisiGeorgia
  3. 3.Department of Ultrasound DiagnosticsNational Medical Academy of Georgia, Research Institute of Clinical MedicineTbilisiGeorgia

Personalised recommendations