Advertisement

Applications

  • Anton Kos
  • Anton Umek
Chapter
Part of the Human–Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)

Abstract

This chapter is dedicated to the presentation of biofeedback applications in sport and rehabilitation. The review of such applications that come in large numbers and varieties is not in the scope of this book. To provide the complete information about the development, properties, functionalities, and results of biofeedback applications, we chose to present only those developed by the authors of this book. Properties and requirements of different sports and rehabilitation therapies are explained first, followed by typical applications scenarios including low dynamic activities, high dynamic activities, multiple sensors, and multiple user cases. Five examples of biofeedback applications are presented and discussed: Golf swing trainer, Smart golf club, Smart ski, water sport, and swimming rehabilitation. Each of them is thoroughly explained in terms of its objectives and functionalities, system architecture and setup, theoretical and research background, results and future development plans. All application presentations include details about the biofeedback system elements used (sensors, processing devices, actuators) and the most important and relevant results that are showing or proving its suitability, applicability, and usefulness for the intended function. Also, for each of the applications future development ideas are listed and explained. By studying this chapter, the reader should get a deeper insight of the various possibilities available for biofeedback application development and use.

References

  1. Abdul Razak AH, Zayegh A, Begg RK, Wahab Y (2012) Foot plantar pressure measurement system: A review. Sensors 12(7):9884–9912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adelsberger R, Aufdenblatten S, Gilgien M, Tröster G (2014) On bending characteristics of skis in use. Procedia Engineering 72:362–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmadi, A., Destelle, F., Monaghan, D., O’Connor, N. E., Richter, C., & Moran, K. (2014, November). A framework for comprehensive analysis of a swing in sports using low-cost inertial sensors. In SENSORS, 2014 IEEE (pp. 2211–2214). IEEEGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbosa AC, Castro FDS, Dopsaj M, Cunha SA, Júnior OA (2013) Acute responses of biomechanical parameters to different sizes of hand paddles in front-crawl stroke. J Sports Sci 31(9):1015–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker BE (2009) Aquatic therapy: scientific foundations and clinical rehabilitation applications. PM&R 1(9):859–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Betzler NF, Monk SA, Wallace ES, Otto SR (2012) Effects of golf shaft stiffness on strain, clubhead presentation and wrist kinematics. Sports Biomech 11(2):223–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Camomilla V, Bergamini E, Fantozzi S, Vannozzi G (2016) In-field use of wearable magneto-inertial sensors for sports performance evaluation. In: ISBS-conference proceedings archive, vol 33(1)Google Scholar
  8. Chambers R, Gabbett TJ, Cole MH, Beard A (2015) The use of wearable microsensors to quantify sport-specific movements. Sports Med 45(7):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Choi YC, Kim HK, Shim KB (2016) Analyzing the characteristics of golf driver shafts with using a strain gage. J Ceram Process Res 17:113–117Google Scholar
  10. Chun S, Kang D, Choi HR, Park A, Lee KK, Kim J (2014) A sensor-aided self coaching model for uncocking improvement in golf swing. Multimed Tools Appl 72(1):253–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delgado-Gonzalo R, Lemkaddem A, Renevey P, Calvo EM, Lemay M, Cox K, Bertschi M (2016) Real-time monitoring of swimming performance. In: 2016 IEEE 38th annual international conference of the engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC). IEEE, pp 4743–4746Google Scholar
  12. Dopsaj M, Matković I, Thanopoulos V, Okičić T (2003) Reliability and validity of basic kinematics and mechanical characteristics of pulling force in swimmers measured by the method of tethered swimming with maximum intensity of 60 seconds. Facta Univ Ser: Phys Educ Sport 1(10):11–22Google Scholar
  13. Doyle B (2015) Experts weigh in on head movement during the golf swing. Forever better golf. https://foreverbettergolf.com/articles/experts-weigh-in-on-head-movement-during-the-golf-swing/. Accessed 10 June 2018
  14. Ebling MR (2016) IoT: from sports to fashion and everything in-between. IEEE Pervasive Comput 4:2–4Google Scholar
  15. Falda-Buscaiot T, Hintzy F, Coulmy N (2016) Ground reaction force comparison between both feet during giant slalom turns in alpine skiing. In ISBS-conference proceedings archive, vol 33(1)Google Scholar
  16. Ganzevles S, Vullings R, Beek PJ, Daanen H, Truijens M (2017) Using tri-axial accelerometry in daily elite swim training practice. Sensors 17(5):990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gruwsved Å, Söderback I, Fernholm C (1996) Evaluation of a vocational training programme in primary health care rehabilitation: a case study. Work 7(1):47–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guignard B, Rouard A, Chollet D, Seifert L (2017) Behavioral dynamics in swimming: the appropriate use of inertial measurement units. Front Psychol 8:383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guo J, Zhou X, Sun Y, Ping G, Zhao G, Li Z (2016) Smartphone-based patients’ activity recognition by using a self-learning scheme for medical monitoring. J Med Syst 40(6):140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hsu YL, Chen YT, Chou PH, Kou YC, Chen YC, Su HY (2016) Golf swing motion detection using an inertial-sensor-based portable instrument. In 2016 IEEE international conference on consumer electronics-Taiwan (ICCE-TW). (pp 1–2)Google Scholar
  21. Jakus G, Stojmenova K, Tomažič S, Sodnik J (2017) A system for efficient motor learning using multimodal augmented feedback. Multimed Tools Appl 76(20):20409–20421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jensen U, Schmidt M, Hennig M, Dassler FA, Jaitner T, Eskofier BM (2015) An IMU-based mobile system for golf putt analysis. Sports Eng 18(2):123–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jiao L, Bie R, Wu H, Wei Y, Kos A, Umek A (2018) Golf swing data classification with deep convolutional neural network. IPSI BGD Trans Internet Res 14(1):29–34Google Scholar
  24. Kirby R (2009) Development of a real-time performance measurement and feedback system for alpine skiers. Sports Technol 2(1–2):43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kos A, Umek A (2018) Wearable sensor devices for prevention and rehabilitation in healthcare: swimming exercise with real-time therapist feedback. IEEE Internet Things J.  https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2018.2850664
  26. Kos A, Tomažič S, Umek A (2016) Suitability of smartphone inertial sensors for real-time biofeedback applications. Sensors 16(3):301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kos A, Milutinović V, Umek A (2018) Challenges in wireless communication for connected sensors and wearable devices used in sport biofeedback applications. Future Gener Comput Syst.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.03.032
  28. Kunze K, Minamizawa K, Lukosch S, Inami M, Rekimoto J (2017) Superhuman sports: Applying human augmentation to physical exercise. IEEE Pervasive Comput 16(2):14–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li R, Cai Z, Lee W, Lai DT (2016) A wearable biofeedback control system based body area network for freestyle swimming. In: 2016 IEEE 38th annual international conference of the engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC). IEEE, (pp 1866–1869)Google Scholar
  30. Li X, Wang C, Wang H, Guo J (2017) Real-time dynamic data analysis model based on wearable smartband. In: International conference on intelligent and interactive systems and applications. Springer, Cham, (pp 442–449)Google Scholar
  31. Lightman K (2016) Silicon gets sporty. IEEE Spectr 53(3):48–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Llosa J, Vilajosana I, Vilajosana X, Navarro N, Surinach E, Marques JM (2009) REMOTE, a wireless sensor network based system to monitor rowing performance. Sensors 9(9):7069–7082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Magalhaes FAD, Vannozzi G, Gatta G, Fantozzi S (2015) Wearable inertial sensors in swimming motion analysis: a systematic review. J Sports Sci 33(7):732–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mendes JJA Jr, Vieira MEM, Pires MB, Stevan SL Jr (2016) Sensor fusion and smart sensor in sports and biomedical applications. Sensors 16(10):1569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Michahelles F, Schiele B (2005) Sensing and monitoring professional skiers. IEEE Pervasive Comput 4(3):40–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mitsui T, Tang S, Obana S (2015 Support system for improving golf swing by using wearable sensors. In: 2015 eighth international conference on mobile computing and ubiquitous networking (ICMU). IEEE, (pp 100–101)Google Scholar
  37. Mooney R, Corley G, Godfrey A, Quinlan LR, ÓLaighin G (2015) Inertial sensor technology for elite swimming performance analysis: a systematic review. Sensors 16(1):18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nagle EF, Sanders ME, Franklin BA (2017) Aquatic high intensity interval training for cardiometabolic health: benefits and training design. Am J Lifestyle Med 11(1):64–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Najafi B, Lee-Eng J, Wrobel JS, Goebel R (2015) Estimation of centre of mass trajectory using wearable sensors during golf swing. J Sports Sci Med 14(2):354Google Scholar
  40. Nakazato K, Scheiber P, Müller E (2011) A comparison of ground reaction forces determined by portable force-plate and pressure-insole systems in alpine skiing. J Sports Sci Med 10(4):754Google Scholar
  41. Nam CNK, Kang HJ, Suh YS (2014) Golf swing motion tracking using inertial sensors and a stereo camera. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 63(4):943–952. [192]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Naruo T, Kawashima K, Kimura T, Oota Y, Kanayama T (2013) Golf swing analysis by an inertia sensor and selecting optimum golf club. In: ISBS-conference proceedings archive, vol 1(1)Google Scholar
  43. Neiva HP, Marques MC, Travassos BF, Marinho DA (2017) Wearable technology and aquatic activities: a review. Motricidade 13(1):219Google Scholar
  44. Nemec B, Petrič T, Babič J, Supej M (2014) Estimation of alpine skier posture using machine learning techniques. Sensors 14(10):18898–18914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Parvis M, Grassini S, Angelini E, Scattareggia P (2016) Swimming symmetry assessment via multiple inertial measurements. In: 2016 IEEE international symposium on medical measurements and applications (MeMeA). IEEE, (pp. 1–6)Google Scholar
  46. Parvis M, Corbellini S, Lombardo L, Iannnucci L, Grassini S, Angelini E (2017) Inertial measurement system for swimming rehabilitation. In: 2017 IEEE international symposium on medical measurements and applications (MeMeA). IEEE, (pp. 361–366)Google Scholar
  47. Prins J, Cutner D (1999) Aquatic therapy in the rehabilitation of athletic injuries. Clin Sports Med 18(2):447–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Qualisys, Motion Capture System. http://www.qualisys.com. Accessed 27 June 2018
  49. Sakurai Y, Fujita Z, Ishige Y (2016) Automatic identification of subtechniques in skating-style roller skiing using inertial sensors. Sensors 16(4):473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shyr TW, Shie JW, Jiang CH, Li JJ (2014) A textile-based wearable sensing device designed for monitoring the flexion angle of elbow and knee movements. Sensors 14(3):4050–4059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Silva ASM (2014) Wearable sensors systems for human motion analysis: sports and rehabilitation. Doctoral dissertation, Universidade do Porto, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  52. Singh R, Stringer H, Drew T, Evans C, Jones RS (2015) Swimming breaststroke after total hip replacement; are we sending the correct message. J Arthritis 4(147):2Google Scholar
  53. Stamm A, James DA, Thiel DV (2013) Velocity profiling using inertial sensors for freestyle swimming. Sports Eng 16(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stančin S, Tomažič S (2013) Early improper motion detection in golf swings using wearable motion sensors: The first approach. Sensors 13(6):7505–7521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sturm D, Yousaf K, Eriksson M (2010) A wireless, unobtrusive kayak sensor network enabling feedback solutions. In 2010 international conference on body sensor networks (bsn). IEEE, (pp 159–163)Google Scholar
  56. Sun Y, Song H, Jara AJ, Bie R (2016) Internet of things and big data analytics for smart and connected communities. IEEE Access 4:766–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tessendorf B, Gravenhorst F, Arnrich B, Tröster G (2011) An imu-based sensor network to continuously monitor rowing technique on the water. In 2011 seventh international conference on intelligent sensors, sensor networks and information processing (ISSNIP). IEEE, (pp 253–258)Google Scholar
  58. Ueda M, Negoro H, Kurihara Y, Watanabe K (2013) Measurement of angular motion in golf swing by a local sensor at the grip end of a golf club. IEEE Trans Human-Mach Syst 43(4):398–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Umek, A., & Kos, A. (2018a). Smart equipment design challenges for real time feedback support in sport. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  60. Umek A, Kos A (2018b) Wearable sensors and smart equipment for feedback in watersports. Procedia Comput Sci 129:496–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Umek A, Tomažič S, Kos A (2015) Wearable training system with real-time biofeedback and gesture user interface. Pers Ubiquit Comput 19(7):989–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Umek A, Zhang Y, Tomažič S, Kos A (2017) Suitability of strain gage sensors for integration into smart sport equipment: A golf club example. Sensors 17(4):916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wang Z, Wang J, Zhao H, Yang N, Fortino G (2016) CanoeSense: monitoring canoe sprint motion using wearable sensors. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC) IEEEGoogle Scholar
  64. Wei Y, Jiao L, Wang S, Bie R, Chen Y, Liu D (2016) Sports motion recognition using MCMR features based on interclass symbolic distance. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 12(5):7483536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Woods T (2009) Maintain a quiet head http://www.golfdigest.com/golf-instruction/2009-10/tiger_woods_keep_quiet_head. Golf digest. Accessed 26 June 2018
  66. Yilmaz I, Yanardag M, Birkan B, Bumin G (2004) Effects of swimming training on physical fitness and water orientation in autism. Pediatr Int 46(5):624–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yu G, Jang YJ, Kim J, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim K, Panday SB (2016) Potential of IMU sensors in performance analysis of professional alpine skiers. Sensors 16(4):463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Kos A, Umek A (2017) A sensor-based golfer-swing signature recognition method using linear support vector machine. Elektrotehniski Vestnik 84(5):247–252Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anton Kos
    • 1
  • Anton Umek
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia
  2. 2.Faculty of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations