Chatbot in a Campus Environment: Design of LiSA, a Virtual Assistant to Help Students in Their University Life

  • Massimiliano Dibitonto
  • Katarzyna Leszczynska
  • Federica TazziEmail author
  • Carlo M. Medaglia
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10903)


This work presents some initial results of our research about the design and implementation of “LiSA” (Link Student Assistant), a chatbot intended to help students in their campus life, through information and services. The focus of our research is to understand which kind of information and services are better accessed through this kind of touch point, how the chatbot personality influences the user experience and the interaction and which level of intelligence should be implemented. After an analysis of the state of the art in the considered application domain we investigated, through a survey, the users’ needs and their inclination to the use of a chatbot for this specific purpose. A chatbot was created to deliver the survey, allowing to understand both the users’ needs and their behaviour while using the tool.


Chatbot Virtual assistant Human computer interaction Conversational interfaces User experience 


  1. 1.
    Mastercard Developers. Accessed 10 Jan 2018
  2. 2.
    De Angeli, A., Lynch, P., Johnson, G.: Personifying the e-market: a framework for social agents. In: Hirose, M. (ed.) Proceedings of Interact 2001, pp. 198–205. IOS Press (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weizenbaum, J.: ELIZA - a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Commun. ACM 9(1), 36–45 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wallace, R.S.: The anatomy of A.L.I.C.E. In: Epstein, R., Roberts, G., Beber, G. (eds.) Parsing the Turing Test, pp. 181–210. Springer, Dordrecht (2009). Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shawar, B.A., Atwell, E.: Chatbots: are they really useful? LDV Forum 22(1), 29–49 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Følstad, A., Brandtzæg, P.B.: Chatbots and the new world of HCI. Interactions 24(4), 38–42 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xu, A., Liu, Z., Guo, Y., Sinha, V., Akkiraju, R.: A new chatbot for customer service on social media. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brandtzaeg, P.B., Følstad, A.: Why people use Chatbots. In: Kompatsiaris, I., Cave, J., Satsiou, A., Carle, G., Passani, A., Kontopoulos, E., Diplaris, S., McMillan, D. (eds.) INSCI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10673, pp. 377–392. Springer, Cham (2017). Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schumaker, R.P., Ginsburg, M., Chen, H., Liu, Y.: An evaluation of the chat and knowledge delivery components of a low-level dialog system: the AZ-ALICE experiment. Decis. Support Syst. 42(4), 2236–2246 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meisel, W.: Specialized Digital Assistants and Bots: Vendor Guide and Market Study. TMA Associates, Tarzana (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Duijst, D.: Can we Improve the User Experience of Chatbots with Personalisation? (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dale, R.: The return of the Chatbots. Nat. Lang. Eng. 22(5), 811–817 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Sansonnet, J.P., Leray, D., Martin, J.C.: Architecture of a framework for generic assisting conversational agents. In: Gratch, J., Young, M., Aylett, R., Ballin, D., Olivier, P. (eds.) IVA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4133, pp. 145–156. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuligowska, K.: Commercial Chatbot: performance evaluation, usability metrics and quality standards of embodied conversational agents (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Holtgraves, T.: Communication in context: effects of speaker status on the comprehension of indirect requests. J. Exper. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 20, 1205–1218 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hill, J., Ford, W.R., Farrera, I.G.: Real conversations with artificial intelligence: a comparison between human-human online conversations and human-chatbot. Comput. Hum. Behav. 49, 245–250 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    De Angeli, A.J., Graham, I., Coventry, L.: The unfriendly user: exploring social reactions to Chatterbots. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Affective Human Factors Design. Asean Academic Press. Han, S. K., YounGi, London (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rickenberg, R., Reeves, B.: The effects of animated characters on anxiety, task performance, and evaluations of user interfaces. In: Letters of CHI 2000, pp. 49–56 (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brahnam, S.: Gendered bods and bot abuse. In: CHI 2006 Workshop Misuse and Abuse of Interactive Technologies, Montréal, Québec (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    De Angeli, A., Brahnam, S.: Sex stereotypes and conversational agents. In: Proceedings of Gender and Interaction: Real and Virtual Women in a Male World, Venice, Italy (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ciechanowski, L., Przegalinska, A., Magnuski, M., Gloor, P.: In the shades of the uncanny valley: An experimental study of human–chatbot interaction. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. (2018)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Memon, A.R., Chowdhry, B.S., Shah, S.M.S., Memon, T.R., Shah, S.M.A.: An electronic information desk system for information dissemination in educational institutions. In: 2nd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom 2015), pp. 1275–1280. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Benotti, L., Martínez, M.C., Schapachnik, F.: Engaging high school students using Chatbots. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE 2014, pp. 63–68. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ghose, S., Barua, J.J.: Toward the implementation of a topic specific dialogue based natural language Chatbot as an undergraduate advisor. In: International Conference on Informatics, Electronics & Vision (ICIEV) 2013, pp. 1–5. IIIE (2013)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
    Ranoliya, B.R., Raghuwanshi, N., Singh, S.: Chatbot for university related FAQs. In: 2017 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), Udupi (2017)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chatfuel. Accessed 15 Feb 2018

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Massimiliano Dibitonto
    • 1
  • Katarzyna Leszczynska
    • 1
  • Federica Tazzi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carlo M. Medaglia
    • 1
  1. 1.DASICLink Campus UniversityRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations