Advertisement

Exploration of Behavioral Markers to Support Adaptive Learning

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10903)

Abstract

In designing and developing adaptive learning systems, it is desirable to incorporate as much information about the learner as possible to better tailor in instructional experience. Behavioral markers exhibited by the learner offer a source of information with the potential to shape instructional content. In the case of computer-based training environments, this source of information may include behaviors ranging from mouse cursor movement, key stroke dynamics, or eye tracking. We present methods for analyzing the mouse behavior of a learner using kinematic data in situations where knowledge of areas of interest on the screen are not known by the system a priori, as well as in multiple-choice scenarios to analyze the amount of attention spent by the user on various response items. The outcome of this work is to help inform and to influence future studies in adaptive learning which may seek to incorporate such sources of learner information.

Keywords

Mouse tracking Adaptive training 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, through the Joint Program Committee-1/Medical Simulation and Information Science Research Program under Award No. W81XWH-16-1-0460. Opinions, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Department of Defense. The U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity, 820 Chandler Street, Fort Detrick MD 21702-5014 is the awarding and administering acquisition office.

References

  1. 1.
    Tenopir, C., Wang, P., Zhang, Y., Simmons, B., Pollard, R.: Academic users’ interactions with ScienceDirect in search tasks: affective and cognitive behaviors. Inform. Process Manag. 44(1), 105–121 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moody, G., Galletta, D.: Lost in cyberspace: the impact of information scent and time constraints on stress, performance, and attitudes online. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 32(1), 192–224 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ponkshe, R., Chole, V.: Keystroke and mouse dynamics: a review on behavioral biometrics. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Mob. Comput. 4(2), 314–345 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bradlow, E., Gangwar, M., Kopalle, P., Voleti, S.: The role big data and predictive analytics in retailing. J. Retail. 93(1), 79–95 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ottavi, P., Pasinetti, M., Popolo, R., Salvatore, G., Lysaker, P., Dimaggio, G.: Metacognition-oriented social skills training. In: Social Cognition and Metacognition in Schizophrenia, Chap. 17, San Diego, pp. 285–300. Academic Press (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aydemir, G.A., Langdon, P.M., Godsill, S.: User target intention recognition from cursor position using Kalman filter. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds.) UAHCI 2013. LNCS, vol. 8009, pp. 419–426. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39188-0_45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Biswas, P., Langdon, P.M.: Multi-modal target prediction. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds.) UAHCI 2014. LNCS, vol. 8513, pp. 313–324. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07437-5_30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ziebart, B.D., Dey, A.K., Bagnell, J.A.: Probabilistic pointing target prediction via inverse optimal control. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pasqual, P.T., Wobbrock, J.O.: Mouse pointing endpoint prediction using kinematic template matching. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fitts, P.: The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J. Exp. Psychol. 47(6), 381–391 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Savitzky, A., Golay, M.J.E.: Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal. Chem. 36(8), 1627–1639 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Soar Technology, Inc.Ann ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations