Advertisement

Exploring Technology Use in Dance Performances

  • Klaudia Çarçani
  • Veronica Wachek Hansen
  • Harald Maartmann-Moe
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10902)

Abstract

The objective of the paper is to critically reflect on how research through design (RtD) can be used to gain knowledge of a new design context within HCI. We use the design research triangle presented by Fallman [1] as the framework for analyzing and to reflect upon the RtD process. The design context to which this new knowledge was applied to is within the area of dance and technology. Our design inquiry, therefore, using the term we coined – addhance, seeks to either add a sort of novel experience, or enhance a dance performance. We, thus, taking an RtD approach, explored how the dancers could compose music by moving their bodies. We designed a Kinect based system that captures dancer’s movements and translates them into music. Intending to addhance the choreography, enlighten dancers’ movements and bring a new disrupted workflow of both creating and enjoying a dancing performance.

Keywords

RtD Dance Technology HCI 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project was, in part, financed by the EU Creative Europe project “The People’s Smart Sculpture”, under the grant number EC-EACEA 2014-2330. We are grateful to Katie Coughlin, the leader of Oslo Children’s Museum and the organizer of the City Kids exhibit. Further, we want to thank Alma Culén for discussions and comments on the paper. Finally, thanks are due to dancers who helped us fine tune Musical Moves and CityKids visitors who tried it.

References

  1. 1.
    Fallman, D.: The interaction design research triangle of design practice, design studies, and design exploration. Des. Issues 24(3), 4–18 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lazar, J., Feng, J.H., Hochheiser, H.: Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fallman, D.: Design-oriented human-computer interaction. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Culén, A.L., Mainsah, H., Finken, S.: Design practice in human computer interaction design education (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gaver, W.: What should we expect from research through design? In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J.: Research through design in HCI. In: Olson, J.S., Kellogg, W.A. (eds.) Ways of Knowing in HCI, pp. 167–189. Springer, New York (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., Hansen, L.K.: Immodest proposals: research through design and knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bowers, J.: The logic of annotated portfolios: communicating the value of’research through design’. In: Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dalsgaard, P.: Research in and through design: an interaction design research approach. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bencina, R., Wilde, D., Langley, S.: Gesture ≈ Sound experiments: process and mappings. In: NIME. Citeseer (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Halpern, M.K., et al.: MoBoogie: creative expression through whole body musical interaction. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Castellano, G., et al.: Expressive control of music and visual media by full-body movement. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Birringer, J., Danjoux, M.: The sound of movement wearables: performing UKIYO. Leonardo 46(3), 232–240 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Culén, A.L., Rosseland, R.: Ecologies of spaces for enjoyable interactions. Int. J. Adv. Netw. Serv. 6(3), 361–373 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mason, P.H.: Music, dance and the total art work: choreomusicology in theory and practice. Res. Dance Educ. 13(1), 5–24 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Odom, W., et al.: From research prototype to research product. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Frayling, C.: Research in Art and Design. Royal College of Art, London (1993)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Koskinen, I., et al.: Design Research Through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom. Elsevier, Oxford (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Forlizzi, J., Zimmerman, J., Evenson, S.: Crafting a place for interaction design research in HCI. Des. Issues 24(3), 19–29 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., Evenson, S.: Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gaver, B., Bowers, J.: Annotated portfolios. Interactions 19(4), 40–49 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ucar, E.: Eclipse. http://www.ezgiucar.com/. Accessed 19 Feb 2018
  23. 23.
    Vincent, J.B.: An Errand into two minds: The music of Gian Carlo Menotti in the choreography of Martha Graham and Gertrud Bodenwieser. Brolga Aust. J. Dance (27), 7 (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rosseland, R.B.: Design and evaluation of an interactive music system for exercise and physical activity with Alzheimer’s patients. SoundEffects-An Interdisc. J. Sound Sound Experience 6(1), 4–22 (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    MAX. https://cycling74.com/products/max/. Accessed 19 Feb 2018
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
    Norman, D.: The Design of Everyday Things. Verlag Franz Vahlen GmbH (2016)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee, J.-J.: The true benefits of designing design methods. Artifact 3(2), 5.1–5.12 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gaver, W.W., et al.: The drift table: designing for ludic engagement. In: CHI 2004 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Østfold University CollegeHaldenNorway
  2. 2.University of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations