Advertisement

Usability Evaluation of Origin of Replication Finding Tools

  • Isra Al-Turaiki
  • Maryam Aloumi
  • Nour Aloumi
  • Noorah Almanyi
  • Khulood Alghamdi
  • Sarah Almuqhim
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10902)

Abstract

Nowadays, there is a significant increase in the number of Bioinformatics tools and databases. Researchers from various interdisciplinary fields need to use these tools. Usability is an important quality of software in general, and bioinformatics tools in particular. Improving the usability of bioinformatics tools allows users to use the tool to its fullest potential. In this paper, we evaluate the usability of two online bioinformatics tools Ori-Finder 1 and Ori-Finder 2 in terms of efficiency, effectiveness, and satisfaction. The evaluation focuses on investigating how easily and successfully can users use Ori-Finder1 and Ori-Finder 2 to find the origin of replication in Bacterial and Archaeal genomes. To the best of our knowledge, the usability of these two tools has not been studied before. Twelve participants were recruited from four user groups. The average tasks completion times were compared. Many usability issues were identified by users of bioinformatics tools. Based on our results, we list recommendations for better design of bioinformatics tools.

Keywords

Origin of replication Bioinformatics Usability evaluation oriC 

Notes

Aknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the participants who generously shared their time and experience for the purposes of this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Usability Testing \(|\) Morae \(|\) TechSmith. https://www.techsmith.com/morae.html
  2. 2.
    Al-Ageel, N., Al-Wabil, A., Badr, G., AlOmar, N.: Human factors in the design and evaluation of bioinformatics tools. Procedia Manuf. 3, 2003–2010 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W., Lipman, D.J.: Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215(3), 403–410 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bailey, T.L., Boden, M., Buske, F.A., Frith, M., Grant, C.E., Clementi, L., Ren, J., Li, W.W., Noble, W.S.: MEME Suite: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 37(suppl–2), W202–W208 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bolchini, D., Finkelstein, A., Perrone, V., Nagl, S.: Better bioinformatics through usability analysis. Bioinformatics 25(3), 406–412 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bolchini, D., Garzotto, F.: Quality of web usability evaluation methods: an empirical study on MiLE+. In: Weske, M., Hacid, M.-S., Godart, C. (eds.) WISE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4832, pp. 481–492. Springer, Heidelberg (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77010-7_47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chang, T.H., Huang, H.D., Chuang, T.N., Shien, D.M., Horng, J.T.: RNAMST: efficient and flexible approach for identifying RNA structural homologs. Nucleic Acids Res. 34(Suppl–2), W423–W428 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Delcher, A.L., Bratke, K.A., Powers, E.C., Salzberg, S.L.: Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 23(6), 673–679 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gao, F., Zhang, C.T.: Ori-Finder: a web-based system for finding oriC s in unannotated bacterial genomes. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 79 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grant, C.E., Bailey, T.L., Noble, W.S.: FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif. Bioinformatics 27(7), 1017–1018 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guo, F.B., Ou, H.Y., Zhang, C.T.: ZCURVE: a new system for recognizing protein-coding genes in bacterial and archaeal genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 31(6), 1780–1789 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kurtz, S., Choudhuri, J.V., Ohlebusch, E., Schleiermacher, C., Stoye, J., Giegerich, R.: REPuter: the manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale. Nucleic Acids Res. 29(22), 4633–4642 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leonard, A.C., Mechali, M.: DNA replication origins. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5(10), a010116 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Luo, H., Zhang, C.T., Gao, F.: Ori-Finder 2, an integrated tool to predict replication origins in the archaeal genomes. Front. Microbiol. 5, 482 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mirel, B., Wright, Z.: Heuristic evaluations of bioinformatics tools: a development case. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) HCI 2009. LNCS, vol. 5610, pp. 329–338. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02574-7_37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mullany, L.E., Wolff, R.K., Slattery, M.L.: Effectiveness and usability of bioinformatics tools to analyze pathways associated with miRNA expression. Cancer Inform. 14, 121–130 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rabani, M., Kertesz, M., Segal, E.: Computational prediction of RNA structural motifs involved in posttranscriptional regulatory processes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105(39), 14885–14890 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isra Al-Turaiki
    • 1
  • Maryam Aloumi
    • 1
  • Nour Aloumi
    • 1
  • Noorah Almanyi
    • 1
  • Khulood Alghamdi
    • 1
  • Sarah Almuqhim
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Computer and Information SciencesKing Saud UniversityRiyadhKingdom of Saudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations