Advertisement

“I’m not Stupid” - Attitudes Towards Adaptation Among People with Dyslexia

  • Gerd Berget
  • Siri Fagernes
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10901)

Abstract

A significant portion of the population have dyslexia, which is commonly associated with reading and writing difficulties. In the context of developing materials well-suited for users with reading disorders, one solution has been to develop materials especially targeted at dyslexic users. However, how are the attitudes among users with dyslexia towards adaptation? In this paper, we report the findings from qualitative interviews with 20 adults with dyslexia. The main finding was that they were sceptical towards adapted products, among others because it made them “feel stupid” and because the adapted format affected the reading experience negatively. In this paper we argue to instead work within the universal design paradigm, trying to develop products and services usable by all people, thus reducing the need for particular user groups to utilise “special solutions”.

Keywords

Dyslexia Adaptation Universal design 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Leser søker bok (Books for Everyone) and Dyslexia Norway for helping with recruiting participants, and to Leser søker bok for contributing with gift cards to the participants.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahissar, M.: Dyslexia and the anchoring-deficit hypothesis. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11(11), 458–465 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mortimore, T., Crozier, W.R.: Dyslexia and difficulties with study skills in higher education. Stud. High. Educ. 31(2), 235–251 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Majerus, S., Cowan, N.: The nature of verbal short-term impairment in dyslexia: the importance of serial order. Frontiers Psychol. 7, article 1522 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jones, M.W., Snowling, M.J., Moll, K.: What automaticity deficit? Activation of lexical information by readers with dyslexia in a rapid automatized naming Stroop-Switch Task. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 42(3), 465–474 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lauterbach, A.A., Park, Y., Lombardino, L.J.: The roles of cognitive and language abilities in predicting decoding and reading comprehension: comparisons of dyslexia and specific language impairment. Ann. Dyslexia 2016, 1–18 (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Al-Wabil, A.: The Effect of Dyslexia on Web Navigation. City University London, London (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berget, G., Sandnes, F.E.: Searching databases without query-building-aids: implications for dyslexic users. Inf. Res. 20(4), Article 689 (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carawan, L.W., Nalavany, B.A., Jenkins, C.: Emotional experience with dyslexia and self-esteem: The protective role of perceived family support in late adulthood. Aging Ment. Health 20(3), 284–294 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Caroll, J.M., Iles, J.E.: An assessment of anxiety levels in dyslexic students in higher education. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 76(3), 651–662 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    MacFarlane, A., Buchanan, G., Al-Wabil, A., Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N.: Visual analysis of dyslexia on search. In: Nordlie, R., Pharo, N. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, pp. 285–288. ACM, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Santana, V.F., de Oliveira, R., de Almeida, L.D.A., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: Web accessibility and people with dyslexia: a survey on techniques and guidelines. In: Vigo, M., Abascal, J., Lopes, R., Salomoni, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A 2012) Lyon, France, 16–17 April, Article no. 35. ACM, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schneps, M.H., Thomson, J.M., Chen, C., Sonnert, G., Pomplun, M.: E-readers are more effective than paper for some with dyslexia. PLIS ONE 8(9), e75634 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rello, L., Baeza-Yates, R.: Good fonts for dyslexia. In: ASSESTS 2013 Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, Article no. 14. ACM, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Brien, B.A., Mansfield, J.S., Legge, G.E.: The effect of print size on reading speed in dyslexia. J. Res. Reading 28(3), 332–349 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rello, L., Pielot, M., Marcos, M.-C., Carlini, R.: Size matters (spacing not): 18 points for a dyslexic-friendly Wikipedia. In Brajnik, G., Salomoni, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, 13–15 May 2013, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil (W4A 2013), Article no. 17. ACM, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    British Dyslexia Association: Dyslexia Style Guide. http://www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/common/ckeditor/filemanager/userfiles/About_Us/policies/Dyslexia_Style_Guide.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2018
  17. 17.
    Zorzi, M., Barbiero, C., Facoetti, A., Lonciari, I., Carrozzi, M., Montico, M., Bravar, L., George, F., Pech-Georgel, C., Ziegler, J.C.: Extra-large letter spacing improves reading in dyslexia. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109(28), 11455–11459 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marinius, E., Mostard, M., Segers, E., Schubert, T.M., Madelaine, A., Wheldall, K.: A special font for people with dyslexia: does it work and if so, why? Dyslexia 22(3), 233–244 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schneps, M.H., Thomson, J.M., Sonnert, G., Pomplun, M., Chen, C., Heffner-Wong, A.: Shorter lines facilitate reading in those who struggle. PLOS ONE 8(8), e71161 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rello, L., Baeza-Yates, R.: How to present more readable text for people with dyslexia. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 16(1), 29–49 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jackson, J.E.: Towards universally accessible typography: a review of research on dyslexia. J. Technol. Persons Disabil. 2, 155–165 (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Petrie, H., Kheir, O.: The relationship between accessibility and usability of websites. In: CHI 2007, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 307–406. ACM, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Story, M.F.: Maximizing usability: the principles of universal design. Assistive Technol. 10(1), 4–12 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Humphrey, N.: Teacher and pupil ratings of self-esteem in developmental dyslexia. Br. J. Spec. Educ. 29(1), 29–36 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Riddick, B., Sterling, C., Farmer, M., Morgan, S.: Self-esteem and anxiety in the educational histories of adult dyslexic students. Dyslexia 5(4), 227–248 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Alexander-Passe, N.: How dyslexic teenagers cope: an investigation of self-esteem, coping and depression. Dyslexia 12(4), 256–275 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thiessen, M., Dyson, M.C.: Typography for children with reading difficulties: preferences for type in reading books. Int. J. Book 6(2), 115–122 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Høien, T., Tønnesen, G.: Ordkjedetesten [The Word Chain Test]. Logometrica, Bryne (2008)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Solheim, O.J., Uppstad, P.H.: Eye-tracking as a tool in process-oriented reading test validation. Int. Electron. J. Elementary Educ. 4(1), 153–168 (2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dahle, A.E., Knivsberg, A.-M.: Internalizing, externalizing and attention problems in dyslexia. Scand. J. Disabil. Res. 16(2), 179–193 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Berget, G.: Search and find? An accessibility study of dyslexia and information retrieval. University of Oslo, Oslo (2016)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    ISO: ISO 8596 Ophthalmic Optics: Visual Acuity Testing – Standard Optotype and its Presentation. ISO, Geneva (2009)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhang, P., Bobier, W., Thompson, B., Hess, R.F.: Binocular balance in normal vision and its modulation by mean luminance. Optom. Vis. Sci. 88(9), 1072–1079 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Archivistics, Library and Information Sciences, Faculty of Social SciencesOsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan UniversityOsloNorway
  2. 2.Mobile Technology Lab, Department of TechnologyWesterdals Oslo School of Arts, Communication and TechnologyOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations