Advertisement

Humor Facilitation of Polarized Events

  • Alessandro Valitutti
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10922)

Abstract

We propose an approach for designing humor facilitation, a specific type of reactive humor consisting in the detection of events and generation of witticisms about them. More specifically, we emphasize the advantage to focus on the negative polarity of events, since this property can be detected with state-of-the-art sentiment analysis and, thus, employed to generate playfully sarcastic comments automatically.

Keywords

Computational humor Interactive humor Humor facilitation Humorous agents 

References

  1. 1.
    Alden, D.L., Mukherjee, A., Hoyer, W.D.: The effects of incongruity, surprise and positive moderators on perceived humor in television advertising. J. Advertising 29(2), 1–15 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allan, J., Papka, R., Lavrenko, V.: Online new event detection and tracking. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGIR 1998 (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Augello, A., Saccone, G., Gaglio, S., Pilato, G.: Humorist Bot: bringing computational humour in a Chat-Bot system. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Intelligent Interfaces for Human-Computer Interaction (IIHCI-2008). Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain, 4–7 March 2008Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Binsted, K., Pain, H., Ritchie, G.: Children’s evaluation of computer-generated punning riddles. Pragmatics Cogn. 2(5), 305–354 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Braslavski, P., Blinov, V., Bolotova, V., Pertsova, K.: How to evaluate humorous response generation, seriously? In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR), New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA, 11–15 March 2018Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dale, R.: Industry watch. The return of the chatbots. Nat. Lang. Eng. 22(5), 811–817 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dybala, P., Ptaszynski, M., Rzepka, R., Araki, K.: Humoroids - conversational agents that induce positive emotions with humor. In: Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2009), pp. 1171–1172, Budapest, Hungary, May 2009Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hao, Y., Veale, T.: An ironic fist in a velvet glove: creative mis-representation in the construction of ironic similes. Minds Mach. 20(4), 635–650 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Long, K., Vines, J., Sutton, S., Brooker, P., Feltwell, T., Kirman, B., Barnett, J., Lawson, S.: “Could you define that in Bot terms”?: requesting, creating and using bots on reddit. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3488–3500, Denver, Colorado, 6–11 May 2017Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mihalcea, R., Strapparava, C.: Learning to laugh (automatically): computational models for humour recognition. J. Comput. Intell. 22(2), 126–142 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Munezero, M., Montero, S.C., Sutinen, E., Pajunen, J.: Are they different? Affect, feeling, emotion, sentiment, and opinion detection in text. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 5(2), 101–111 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Niculescu, A., van Dijk, B., Nijholt, A., Li, H., See, S.L.: Making social robots more attractive: the effects of voice pitch, humor and empathy. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 5(2), 171–191 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nijholt, A.: Conversational agents and the construction of humorous acts. In: Nishida, T. (ed.) Conversational Informatics: An Engineering Approach, Chap. 2, pp. 21–47. Wiley, Chicester (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nijholt, A., Valitutti, A., Niculescu, A.I., Banchs, R.E.: Humor in human-computer interaction: a short survey. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Designing Humour in Human-Computer Interaction (HUMIC 2017), Mumbai, India, 26 September 2017Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pilato, G., Augello, A., Vassallo, G., Gaglio, S.: EHeBby: an evocative humorist chat-bot. Mob. Inf. Syst. 4, 165–181 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Raskin, V., Hempelman, C.F., Taylor, J.M.: How to understand and assess a theory: the evolution of the SSTH into the GTVH and now into the OSTH. J. Literary Theory 3(2), 285–312 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ritchie, G.: The structure of forced reinterpretation jokes. In: Proceedings of The April Fools Day Workshop on Computational Humour (TWLT20), pp. 47–56 (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ritchie, G., Manurung, R., Pain, H., Waller, A., Black, R., O’Mara, D.: A practical application of computational humour. In: Cardoso, A., Wiggins, G.A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th International Joint Conference on Computational Creativity, pp. 91–98, London (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Scherer, K.R., Shorr, A., Johnstone, T. (eds.): Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research. Oxford University Press, Canary (2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stock, O., Strapparava, C.: HAHAcronym: humorous agents for humorous acronyms. In: Stock, O., Strapparava, C., Nijholt, A. (eds.) Proceedings of The April Fools Day Workshop on Computational Humour (TWLT20), Trento, Italy (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Valitutti, A.: How many jokes are really funny? Towards a new approach to the evaluation of computational humour generators. In: Proceedings of 8th International Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Cognitive Science, Copenhagen (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Valitutti, A., Toivonen, H., Doucet, A., Toivanen, J.M.: “Let everything turn well in your wife”: Generation of adult humor using lexical constraints. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), Sofia, Bulgaria, August 2013Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Valitutti, A.: Making fun of failures computationally. In: Streitz, N., Markopoulos, P. (eds.) DAPI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10291, pp. 684–695. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58697-7_51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Valitutti, A., Doucet, A., Toivanen, J.M., Toivonen, H.: Computational generation and dissection of lexical replacement humor. Nat. Lang. Eng. 22(5), 1–23 (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Valitutti, A., Toivonen, H., Gross, O., Toivanen, J.M.: Decomposition and distribution of humorous effect in interactive systems. In: Artificial Intelligence of Humor. AAAI Fall Symposium Series, pp. 96–100, Arlington, Virginia, USA, November 2012Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Valitutti, A., Veale, T.: Infusing humor in unexpected events. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Distributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions, HCI International, Toronto, Canada, 17–22 July 2016Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Veale, T., Valitutti, A.: Tweet dreams are made of this: appropriate incongruity in the dreamwork of language. Lingua 197, 141–153 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Phedes LabMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations