Advertisement

Robotic Stand-Up Comedy: State-of-the-Art

  • Anton Nijholt
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10921)

Abstract

Humanoid and social robots have to perform in socially acceptable ways. They interact with humans and support humans in their needs and their activities. Stand-up comedy is an extreme form of human-human and human-audience interaction. It can be mild, but often it goes beyond what is socially accepted in verbal and nonverbal behavior and expressed opinions. But it makes people laugh and we can ask whether this can be done by robots and what we can learn from it for other ways of robot-human or robot audience interaction. In this paper we confine ourselves to a survey of developments in robotic stand-up comedy. We hope that this survey helps to stimulate research in this area and identify topics of more general interest in robot-human interaction.

Keywords

Humor Social robots Stand-up comedy Human-robot interaction Audience responses Verbal interaction Nonverbal interaction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper finds its origin in an “Artificial Intelligence and Comedy” meeting with stand-up comedians, comedy writers and AI and humor researchers. The meeting took place in St. Peter’s College in Oxford on November 25th, 2017. I’m grateful to organizer and comedy writer Charlie Skelton for inviting me and allowing me to present.

References

  1. 1.
    Raskin, V.: Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Springer Science & Business Media, New York (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hulstijn, J., Nijholt, A. (eds.): Computational humor: automatic interpretation and generation of verbal humor. In: Proceedings Twente Workshop on Language Technology 12 (TWLT12). University of Twente, The Netherlands (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stock, O., Strapparava, C., Nijholt, A. (eds.): The April fools’ day workshop on computational humour. In: Proceedings Twente Workshop on Language Technology 20 (TWLT20). University of Twente, The Netherlands (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nijholt, A. (ed.). Computational humor 2012. In: Proceedings 3rd International Workshop on Computational Humor. CTIT Workshop Proceedings WP12-02. Centre for Telematics and Information Technology, Enschede, Netherlands (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Čapek, K.: R.U.R. (Rossum´s Universal Robots). Kolektivní drama o vstupní komedii atřech dějstvích. 1920. eBook #13083, Project Gutenberg (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gruner, C.R.: The Game of Humor: A Comprehensive Theory of Why We Laugh. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ruch, W., Heintz, S., Platt, T., Wagner, L., Proyer, R.T.: Broadening humor: comic styles differentially tap into temperament, character, and ability. Front. Psychol. 9(6), 1–18 (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bechade, L., Duplessis, G.D., Devillers, L.: Empirical study of humor support in social human-robot interaction. In: Streitz, N., Markopoulos, P. (eds.) DAPI 2016. LNCS, vol. 9749, pp. 305–316. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39862-4_28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bechade, L., Devillers, L.: Detection of humor appreciation from emotional and paralinguistic clues in social human-robot interaction. In: Joshi, A., Balkrishan, D.K., Dalvi, G., Winckler, M. (eds.) Adjunct Conference Proceedings Interact 2017, pp. 215–227. Industrial Design Centre, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kahn Jr. P.H., Ruckert, J.H., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Gary, H.E., Shen, S.: No joking aside - using humor to establish sociality in HRI. In: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 188–189. ACM, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mirnig, N., Stadler, S., Stollnberger, G., Giuliani, M., Tscheligi, M.: Robot humor: how self-irony and schadenfreude influence people’s rating of robot likability. In: 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 166–171. IEEE, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sjöbergh, J., Araki, K.: A complete and modestly funny system for generating and performing Japanese stand-up comedy. In: Coling 2008: Companion volume – Posters and Demonstrations, pp. 111–114. ACL, Stroudsburg (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sjöbergh, J., Araki, K.: Robots make things funnier. In: Hattori, H., Kawamura, T., Idé, T., Yokoo, M., Murakami, Y. (eds.) JSAI 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5447, pp. 306–313. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00609-8_27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tay, B.T.C., Low, S.L., Ko, K.H., Park, T.: Types of humor that robots can play. Comput. Hum. Behav. 60(C), 19–28 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Niculescu, A., van Dijk, B., Nijholt, A.: Making social robots more attractive: the effects of voice pitch, humor and empathy. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 5(2), 171–191 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mavridis, N.: A review of verbal and non-verbal human–robot interactive communication. Robot. Auton. Syst. 63(Part 1), 22–35 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Norrick, N.R.: A theory of humor in interaction. J. Literary Theory 3(2), 261–284 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Attardo, S., Pickering, L.: Timing in the performance of jokes. Humor 24(2), 233–250 (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hasegawa, D., Sjöbergh, J., Rzepka, R., Arak, K.: Automatically choosing appropriate gestures for jokes. In: AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment, pp. 40–45. AAAI, Menlo Park (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mirnig, N., Stollnberger, G., Giuliani, M., Tscheligi, M.: Elements of humor: how humans perceive verbal and non-verbal aspects of humorous robot behavior. In: Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2017), pp. 211–212. ACM, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sun, X., Lichtenauer, J., Valstar, M., Nijholt, A., Pantic, M.: A multimodal database for mimicry analysis. In: D’Mello, S., Graesser, A., Schuller, B., Martin, J.-C. (eds.) ACII 2011. LNCS, vol. 6974, pp. 367–376. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24600-5_40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schmidt, R.C., Nie, L., Franco, A., Richardson, M.J.: Bodily synchronization underlying joke telling. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8(63), 1–13 (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Truong, K., Heylen, D., Trouvain, J., Campbell, N. (eds.): Proceedings of the 4th Interdisciplinary Workshop on Laughter and other Non-verbal Vocalisations in Speech. University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (2015)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cosentino, S., Kishi, T., Zecca, M., Sessa, S., Bartolomeo, L., Hashimoto, K., Nozawa, T., Takanishi, A.: Human-humanoid robot social interaction: laughter. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), pp. 1396–1401. IEEE, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Becker-Asano, C., Kanda, T., Ishi, C., Ishiguro, H.: Studying laughter combined with two humanoid robots. AI Soc 26(3), 291–300 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Aaltonen, I., Arvola, A., Heikkilä, P., Lammi, H.: Hello pepper, may i tickle you? Children’s and adults’ responses to an entertainment robot at a shopping mall. In: Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2017), pp. 53–54. ACM, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wendt, C.S., Berg, G.: Nonverbal humor as a new dimension of HRI. In: Proceedings 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 183–188. IEEE, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sone, Y.: Double acts: human-robot performance in Japan’s Bacarobo theatre. In: Emeljanow, V., Arrighi, G. (eds.) A World of Popular Entertainments, pp. 40–51. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pinhanez, C.S., Bobick, A.F.: It/I: an experiment towards interactive theatrical performances. In: CHI 1998 Conference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1998), pp. 333–334. ACM, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Breazeal, C. Interactive robot theatre. In: Proceedings. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003). IEEE, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Perkowski, M., Sasao, T., Kim, J.-H., Lukac, M., Allen, J., Gebauer, S.: Hahoe KAIST robot theatre: learning rules of interactive robot behavior as a multiple-valued logic synthesis problem. In: Proceedings of the 35th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL 2005), pp. 236–248. IEEE, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hoffman, G., Kubat, R., Breazeal, C.: A Hybrid Control System for Puppeteering a Live Robotic Stage Actor. In: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 354–359. IEEE, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bono, M., Maiolino, P., Lefebvre, A., Mastrogiovanni, F., Ishiguro, H.: Challenges for robots acting on a stage. In: Nakatsu, R., Rauterberg, M., Ciancarini, P. (eds.) Handbook of Digital Games and Entertainment Technologies. LNCS, pp. 935–977. Springer, Singapore (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-50-4_62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cavazza, M., Charles, F., Mead, S.J.: Planning characters’ behaviour in interactive storytelling. planning characters’ behaviour in interactive storytelling. Comput. Anim. Virtual Worlds 13(2), 121–131 (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cavazza, M., Charles, F., Mead, S.J.: Intelligent virtual actors that plan … to fail. In: Butz, A., Krüger, A., Olivier, P. (eds.) SG 2003. LNCS, vol. 2733, pp. 151–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-37620-8_15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Carvalho, A., Brisson, A., Paiva, A.: Laugh to me! implementing emotional escalation on autonomous agents for creating a comic sketch. In: Oyarzun, D., Peinado, F., Young, R.M., Elizalde, A., Méndez, G. (eds.) ICIDS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7648, pp. 162–173. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34851-8_16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Thawonmas, R., Tanaka, K., Hassaku, H.: Extended hierarchical task network planning for interactive comedy. In: Lee, J., Barley, M. (eds.) PRIMA 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2891, pp. 205–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39896-7_18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Thawonmas, R., Hassaku, H., Tanaka, K.: Mimicry: another approach for interactive comedy. In: 4th annual European GAME-ON Conference (GAME-ON 2003) on Simulation and AI in Computer Games, London, UK, pp. 47–52 (2003)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tosa, N., Nakatsu, R.: Interactive comedy: laughter as the next intelligence system. In: International Symposium on Micromechatronics and Human Science, pp. 135–138. IEEE Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hayashi, K., Kanda, T., Miyashita, T., Hagita, N.: Robot Manzai - robots conversation as a passive social medium. In: 5th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 456–462. IEEE Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Umetani, T., Nadamoto, A., Kitamura, T.: Manzai robots: entertainment robots as passive media based on autocreated Manzai scripts from web news articles. In: Nakatsu, R., Rauterberg, M., Ciancarini, P. (eds.) Handbook of Digital Games and Entertainment Technologies. LNCS (LNAI), pp. 1041–1068. Springer, Singapore (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-50-4_61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kishi, T., Endo, N., Nozawa, T., Otani, T., Cosentino, S., Zecca, M., Hashimoto, K., Takanish, A.: Bipedal humanoid robot that makes humans laugh with use of the method of comedy and affects their psychological state actively. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, pp. 1965–1970. IEEE, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Knight, H.: A savvy robot standup comic: online learning through audience tracking. In: Workshop paper. ACM TEI (2010)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Knight, H.: Eight lessons learned about nonverbal interactions through robot theater. In: Mutlu, B., Bartneck, C., Ham, J., Evers, V., Kanda, T. (eds.) Third International Conference International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR 2011). LNCS, vol. 7072, pp. 42–51. Springer, Cham (2011)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Katevas, K., Healey, P.G.T., Harris, M.T.: Robot comedy lab: experimenting with the social dynamics of live performance. Front. Psychol. 6, 1253 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Katevas, K., Healey, P., Harris, M.: Robot stand-up: engineering a comic performance. In: Proceedings 2014 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids 2014), Madrid, Spain, pp. 1–3 (2014)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rutter, J.: Stand-up as Interaction: performance and audience in comedy venues. Ph.D. thesis, University of Salford (1997)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Říčný, B.: A Look behind the Curtains of Stand-Up Comedy: Psychology in Stand-Up Comedy. University of Olomouc, Olomouc (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Imagineering InstituteIskandarMalaysia

Personalised recommendations