Advertisement

Measuring Scarcity or Balancing Abundance: Some Reflections on Human-Building Interaction Paradigms from an Architectural Perspective

  • Selena Savic
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10921)

Abstract

Reyner Banham, author of The Architecture of the Well Tempered Environment, described two contrasting approaches to natural resources and architecture: massive structure and power-operated environment. The former, he claimed, is never sufficient on its own: we always needed to also include power-operated infrastructures to make buildings livable.

Few decades later, moved by the oil crises and contemporary pollution concerns, we began to measure building performance and livability by the scarcity of natural reserves of resources. The sense of scarcity became a major drive in development of technologies to measure and reduce energy use.

Parallel to this development, massive structure and power-operated environments conflated in several ways. We can locate smart building development in this lineage of immixture of power-operated environment with massive structure. Rich data collection from sensors and logging of users actions permit to orchestrate, to a certain extent, the co-operation between buildings and their human users.

The discourse on scarcity, however, still haunts the discipline. Scarcity of resources and our attempts to measure them have been a strong drive behind technological developments. This starts to change slowly, with the advances in renewable energy technologies and proliferation of communication networks. By moving away from the scarcity discourse and placing more value on abundance of information, I pertain to address the interplay between user agency and building automation. I discuss three cases of scarcity that can be read in a different key: energy, wireless communication and attention. It is in this way that we can work towards turning mere automation into sophisticated orchestration.

Keywords

Human-building interaction Infrastructure Measurement  Scarcity Abundance 

References

  1. 1.
    Banham, R.: The Architecture of the Well-Tempered Environment. Architectural Press, University of Chicago, New York, Chicago (1969)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Banham, R.: The Architecture of the Well-Tempered Environment. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1984)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bi, D., et al.: Facile synthesized organic hole transporting material for perovskite solar cell with efficiency of 19.8%. Nano Energy 23, 138–144 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.03.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bühlmann, V.: Primary Abundance, Urban Philosophy—Information and The Form of Actuality. In: Metalithikum, I., Hovestadt, L., Bühlmann, V. (eds.) Applied Virtuality Book Series Printed Physics—Metalithikum I, pp. 114–154. Birkhäuser Verlag GmbH, Basel (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1485-8_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grätzel, M. 2003. Dye-sensitized solar cells. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews. 4, 2 (Oct. 2003), 145–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-5567(03)00026-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hillier, B.: Space is the Machine. Space Syntax (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hovestadt, L., et al.: Genius Planet Energy Scarcity to Energy Abundance: A Radical Pathway for Creative Professionals and Environmental Active Amateurs. Birkhauser, Basel (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kolarevic, B., Malkawi, A. (eds.): Performative Architecture: Beyond Instrumentality. Routledge, Abingdon (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Corbusier, L.: The City of Tomorrow and Its Planning. Dover Publications, Mineola (1987)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lockton, D., et al.: Exploring design patterns for sustainable behaviour. Des. J. 16(4), 431–459 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McCullough, M.: Ambient Commons: Attention in the Age of Embodied Information. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McCullough, M.: Digital Ground: Architecture, Pervasive Computing, and Environmental Knowing. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    O’Dwyer, R.: Spectre of the commons: Spectrum regulation in the communism of capital. Ephemera: Theory Polit. Organzation 13(3), 5–34 (2013). Communism of capital?Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sampson, T.D., Parikka, J.: Learning from network dysfunctionality: accidents, enterprise, and small worlds of infection. In: Hartley, J., et al. (eds.) A Companion to New Media Dynamics, pp. 450–460. Wiley-Blackwell (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scoble, R., Israel, S.: Age of Context: Mobile, Sensors, Data and the Future of Privacy. Brewster, Chicago (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Simon, H.A. (ed.) Designing organizations for an information-rich world. In: Computers, Communications, and the Public Interest. Johns Hopkins Press (1971)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Strengers, Y.: Envisioning the smart home: reimagining a smart energy future. digital materialities: design and anthropology. In: Pink, S., et al. (eds). Bloomsbury Academic (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technical University ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations