Advertisement

UMA-P: Smart Bike Interaction that Adapts to Environment, User Habits and Companions

  • Jiachun Du
  • Ran Luo
  • Min Zou
  • Yuebo Shen
  • Ying Yang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10921)

Abstract

In modern transportation system, biking with smart bikes will be a flexible and environmental friendly option for over-crowded mega cities. Aiming at making the biking experience with smart bikes more attractive we create a playful smart bike light UMA-P that forms its own light interaction mode with the metaphor of personality. UMA-P will collect data of the biking condition and perform certain sets of light animations. With the help of UMA-P users are expected to see their smart bikes as a pet that reacts to their biking behavior, biking environment and other smart bikes nearby. A pilot user test is conducted and an increase in acceptance of smart bikes is observed. Our exploration will benefit the human-computer interaction community in designing playful interaction on future transportation which adapts to user behavior and environment.

Keywords

Smart bike Playful experience Adaptive interaction  Tangible user interface Machine personality 

References

  1. 1.
    Baraka, K., Veloso, M.: Adaptive interaction of persistent robots to user temporal preferences. In: Tapus, A., André, E., Martin, J.C., Ferland, F., Ammi, M. (eds.) Social Robotics. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9388, pp. 61–71. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Breazeal, C., Faridi, F.: Robot. Google Patents (2016). https://www.google.com/patents/USD746886
  3. 3.
    Kozima, H., Michalowski, M.P., Nakagawa, C.: Keepon. Int. J. Soc. Rob. 1(1), 3–18 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    LeDoux, J.E.: Brain mechanisms of emotion and emotional learning. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2(2), 191–197 (1992).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4388(92)90011-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mayer, J.D., Salovey, P., Caruso, D.R.: Emotional intelligence: theory, findings, and implications. Psychol. Inq. 15(3), 197–215 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1503_02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mori, M., MacDorman, K.F., Kageki, N.: The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Rob. Autom. Mag. 19(2), 98–100 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shamsuddin, S., Ismail, L.I., Yussof, H., Zahari, N.I., Bahari, S., Hashim, H., Jaffar, A.: Humanoid robot NAO: review of control and motion exploration. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE), pp. 511–516. IEEE (2011). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=6190579
  8. 8.
    Tao, Y., Chen, H., Meng, F., Zhang, X., Ying, F., Yao, C.: Situated apparel: designing to reinforce affective communication. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, pp. 529–532. ACM (2015). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2687893
  9. 9.
    Thomaz, A.L., Breazeal, C.: Robot learning via socially guided exploration (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jiachun Du
    • 1
  • Ran Luo
    • 1
  • Min Zou
    • 1
  • Yuebo Shen
    • 2
  • Ying Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.Zhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.InnoMake Inc.HangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations