Advertisement

Home Automation Internet of Things: Adopted or Diffused?

  • Badar H. Al Lawati
  • Xiaowen Fang
Conference paper
First Online:
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10921)

Abstract

The term Internet of Things has become very popular over the past few years. Major tech organizations and manufacturers are dedicating big portions of their focus on developing the foundations of the Internet of Things, including IBM, Cisco, Google, and many others. Most companies are developing tools and applications that are targeted to different industries like: home automation, smart cities, manufacturing, logistics, etc. This study is focused on the Home Automation and how the Internet of Things is disrupting the regular “non-smart” homes we once knew. This research is planned to study the effects of the Home Automation devices and tools currently available in the market and measure how adopted “accepted” they are within the general community. We will also measure how much disruption is it causing to the non-smart home appliances and devices industry, and how is the industry is being reshaped to cater for this newly developed market.

Keywords

Internet of Things Home automation Smart homes Technology disruption 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Giusto, D., et al.: The Internet of Things: 20th Tyrrhenian Workshop on Digital Communications. Springer Science & Business Media, New York (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1674-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G.: The internet of things: a survey. Comput. Netw. 54(15), 2787–2805 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    SCB Intelligence: Disruptive Civil Technologies–Six Technologies with Potential Impacts on US Interests out to 2025 CR 2008-07.–34 S., 1 Abb., 6 Tab., 6 Anh. National Intelligence Council, Washington (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    INFSO D.4: Internet of Things in 2020: A Roadmap for the Future INFSO D.4 Networked Enterprise & RFID and INFSO G.2 Micro & Nanosystems in co-operation with RFID Working Group of the European Technology Platform on Smart Systems Integration (EPOSS). Technical Report (2008). http://www.iot-visitthefuture.eu/fileadmin/documents/researchforeurope/270808_IoT_in_2020_Workshop_Report_V1-1.pdf
  5. 5.
    Strategy and Policy Unit: ITU internet reports 2005: the internet of things. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union (ITU) (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vermesan, O., et al.: Internet of things strategic research roadmap. Internet Things-Glob. Technol. Soc. Trends 1, 9–52 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hardy, Q.: Looking Beyond the Internet of Things. New York Times, 1 January 2016Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miorandi, D., et al.: Internet of things: vision, applications and research challenges. Ad Hoc Netw. 10(7), 1497–1516 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gershenfeld, N., Krikorian, R., Cohen, D.: The internet of things. Sci. Am. 291(4), 76–81 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guinard, D., Trifa, V.: Towards the web of things: web mashups for embedded devices. In: Workshop on Mashups, Enterprise Mashups and Lightweight Composition on the Web (MEM 2009), Proceedings of WWW (International World Wide Web Conferences), Madrid, Spain (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kortuem, G., et al.: Smart objects as building blocks for the internet of things. IEEE Internet Comput. 14(1), 44–51 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Soliman, M., et al.: Smart home: integrating internet of things with web services and cloud computing. In: 2013 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom). IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ning, H., Hu, S.: Technology classification, industry, and education for Future Internet of Things. Int. J. Commun. Syst. 25(9), 1230–1241 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huansheng, N.: RFID National Major Projects and National Internet of Things. China Machine Press, Beijing (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alaa, M., et al.: A review of smart home applications based on Internet of Things. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 97, 48–65 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Riggins, F.J., Wamba, S.F.: Research directions on the adoption, usage, and impact of the internet of things through the use of big data analytics. In: 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chigona, W., Licker, P.: Using diffusion of innovations framework to explain communal computing facilities adoption among the urban poor. Inf. Technol. Int. Dev. 4(3), 57–73 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weber, R.H.: Internet of things-new security and privacy challenges. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 26(1), 23–30 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mattern, F., Floerkemeier, C.: From the internet of computers to the internet of things. In: Sachs, K., Petrov, I., Guerrero, P. (eds.) From Active Data Management to Event-Based Systems and More. LNCS, vol. 6462, pp. 242–259. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17226-7_15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Apthorpe, N., Reisman, D., Feamster, N.: A smart home is no castle: privacy vulnerabilities of encrypted IoT traffic. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.06805 (2017)
  21. 21.
    Davis, F.D.: A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1985)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci. 46(2), 186–204 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf. Syst. Res. 3(1), 60–95 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: Information systems success revisited. In: 2002 Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS. IEEE (2002)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Seddon, P.B.: A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inf. Syst. Res. 8(3), 240–253 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. Simon and Schuster, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rogers, E.M.: Elements of diffusion. In: Diffusion of Innovations, vol. 5, no. 1.38 (2003)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations, vol. 12. Free Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computing, College of Computing and Digital MediaDePaul UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations