Advertisement

Flight Safety: ESL Flight Crew Member Use of Crew Alerting and Information Systems

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10906)

Abstract

Flight Deck Crew Alerting Systems (FDCAS)—alert systems/Quick Reference Handbook (QRH) checklists are designed with an understanding of how to effectively integrate human capabilities with alert system complexities. There are many English as-a-second language (ESL) flight crewmembers that utilize western designed FDCAS. Purpose of this study was to determine if ESL flight crewmembers’ performance was impacted by use of western built FDCAS during non-normal conditions. Results indicated that ESL flight crewmember English language proficiency and background knowledge were factors that influenced their performance when they utilize crew alerting systems and QRH checklists during non-normal conditions. Design and integration of English language on crew alerting systems and QRH checklists were also contributory factors that impacted flight crewmembers’ performance.

Keywords

Human factors Flight safety System safety Flight deck systems ESL Lexis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author is a Sr. Scientist and Engineer for the Boeing Company. “The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author in a private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of The Boeing Company”.

References

  1. Abdul-Hamid, S., Samuel, M.: Reading scientific texts: some challenges faced by EFL readers. Int. J. Soc. Sci. Hum. 2(6), 509 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. Al-Sohbani, Y., Muthanna, A.: Challenges of Arabic-English translation: the need for re-systematic curriculum and methodology reforms in Yemen. Acad. Res. Int. 4(4), 442 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. Baker, L., Brown, A.L.: Cognitive monitoring in reading. In: Flood, J. (ed.) Understanding Reading Comprehension, pp. 21–44. International Reading Association, Newark (1984)Google Scholar
  4. Barani, M., Karimnia, A.: An investigation into translation students’ english reading comprehension skills and strategies: a cross-sectional study. Elixir Linguit. Trans. 73, 26257–26262 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. Bureau d’Enquetes et d’Analyses (BEA): Final Report on the accident 1st June 2009 to the Airbus A330-203 registered F-GZCP operated by Air France flight 447 Rio de Janeiro-Paris (2012)Google Scholar
  6. Center for Investigation and Accident Prevention (CENIPA): CENIPA Final Report on Accident involving L410 Noar Linhas Aereas Flight 4896 13 July 2011; RF A-019/CENIPA/2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. Coady, J., Huckin, T.: Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A Rationale For Pedagogy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar
  8. Chung, T.M., Nation, P.: Identifying technical vocabulary. System 32(2), 251–263 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Condelli, L., Wrigley, H.S.: Instruction, language and literacy: What works study for adult ESL literacy students. LOT Occas. Ser. 6, 111–133 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. Coxhead, A.J.: An Academic Word List. English Language Institute Occasional Publication Number 18. Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington (1998)Google Scholar
  11. Drury, C.G., Ma, J.: Language Errors in Aviation Maintenance: Final Report. Reports to William J. Hughes Technical Center, the Federal Aviation Administration under research grant #2002-G-025 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. Dycus, D.: Guessing word meaning from context: should we encourage it? Lit. Across Cult. 1(2), 1–6 (1997)Google Scholar
  13. Dyson, M.C.: How physical layout affects reading from screen. Behav. Inf. Technol. 23(6), 377–393 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dwaik, R.A., Shehadeh, A.M.: Guessing patterns of palestinian college students. Read. Matrix 13(1), 14–26 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. FAA Human Factors Team: The interfaces between flight crews and modern flight deck systems. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C. (1996)Google Scholar
  16. FAA: Operational use of flight path management systems. Report of the Performance based operations Aviation Rulemaking Committee/Commercial Aviation Safety Team Flight Deck Automation Working Group (2013)Google Scholar
  17. Hashemi, S.Z., Bagheri, M.S.: External factors influences on EFL learners reading comprehension test performance. Int. J. Lang. Learn. Appl. Linguist. World (IJLLALW) 7(1), 150–166 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. Hancock, O.H.: Reading Skills for College Students, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle Rivers (1998)Google Scholar
  19. Hartley, J.: Designing instructional text for older readers: a literature review. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 25(3), 172–188 (1994). National Council for Educational TechnologyMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ho, L.-C.: A critical analysis of airline safety management with reference to pilots and aviation authority officers. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cranfield University, December 1996Google Scholar
  21. Hutchins, E., Nomura, S., Holder, B.: The ecology of language practices in worldwide airline flight deck operations: the case of Japanese airlines. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aeronautics, Seattle, WA, September 2006, pp. 290–296 (2006)Google Scholar
  22. Interstate Aviation Committee Air Accident Investigation Commission (IAC): Final Report on Boeing 737-505 VP-BKO Aircraft Accident (2009)Google Scholar
  23. Karbalaei, A.: A comparison of the metacognitive reading strategies used by EFL and ESL readers. Read. Matrix 10(2), 165–180 (2010)Google Scholar
  24. Kim, H.: Effects of Korean students’ contextual and lexical knowledge on L2 text comprehension. Engl. Teach. 61(3), 83–103 (2006)Google Scholar
  25. Kobayashi, H., Rinnert, C.: Effects of first language on second language writing: translation versus direct composition. Lang. Learn. 42, 183–215 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Komite Nasional Keselamatan Transportasi (KNKT): Aircraft Accident Investigation Report: PT. Indonesia Air Asia Airbus A320-216; PK-AXC; Karimata Strait. Republic of Indonesia; 28 December 2014 (2015)Google Scholar
  27. Mali Commission of Inquiry (MCI): Ministere De L’Equipment, Des Transports ET DU Desenclavement. Comission D’ Enquete Sur Les Accidents Et Incidents D’Aviation Civile. Final Report. Accident on 24 July 2014 MD-83 registered EC-LTV operated by Swiftair S.A. (2016)Google Scholar
  28. Mehrpour, S., Riazi, A.: The impact of text length on reading comprehension in English as a second language. Asian EFL J. 3(6), 1–14 (2004)Google Scholar
  29. Nation, I.S.P.: Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nylander, E.: The inferencing behaviour of Swedish EFL university students: a quantitative analysis of lexical inferencing in relation to vocabulary depth. Lund University: Centre for Languages and Literature (2014)Google Scholar
  31. Ogilvie, G.: The impact of culture on communications: a study on the possible effects of culture on inter-cockpit communications. University of Hong Kong (1984)Google Scholar
  32. Park, J., Yang, J.S., Hsieh, Y.C.: University level second language readers’ online reading and comprehension strategies. Announcements & Call for Papers, p. 148 (2014)Google Scholar
  33. Parry, K.: Building a vocabulary through academic reading. Tesol Q. 25(4), 629–653 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Salle, G.P., Gibbons, D.M.: AIA/AECMA Project Report on Propulsion System Malfunction Plus Inappropriate Crew Response (PSM + ICR), vol. 1, 1 November 1998 (1998)Google Scholar
  35. Sevillian, D.B.: Flight deck engineering: impact of flight crew alerting and information systems on English as a second language flight crewmembers performance in airline flight operations. Cranfield University 2017 CERES Published Dissertation, UK (2017)Google Scholar
  36. Smith-Jackson, T.L., Wogalter, M.S.: Applying cultural ergonomics/human factors to safety information research. In: Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol. 6, pp. 150–154. Human Factors Society, Santa Monica (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wanpen, S., Sonkoontod, K., Nonkukhetkhong, K.: Technical vocabulary proficiencies and vocabulary learning strategies of engineering students. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 88, 312–320 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang, A.G.: A methodological probe to aeronautical english vocabulary instruction. Open J. Mod. Linguist. 1(2), 45–51 (2011a)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang, Q.: Lexical inferencing strategies for dealing with unknown words in reading - a contrastive study between Filipino Graduate students and chinese graduate students. J. Lang. Teach. Res. 2, 302–313 (2011b)Google Scholar
  40. West, M.: A General Service List of English Words. Longman, Green & Co., London (1953)Google Scholar
  41. Wogalter, M.S., Begley, P.B., Scancorelli, L.F., Brelsford, J.W.: Effectiveness of elevator service signs: measurement of perceived understandability, willingness to comply and behavior. Appl. Ergon. 28, 181–187 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yildiz-Genc, Z.: An investigation on strategies of reading in first and second languages. Selected papers from 18th ISTAL, pp. 407–415 (2009)Google Scholar
  43. Ynfiesta, B., Suarez, L., Fernandez-Peraza, A.: Translation of acronyms and initialisms in medical texts on cardiology. Cuba. Soc. Cardiol: CorSalud 2013 5(1), 93–100 (2013)Google Scholar
  44. You, C.: A comparative study of second language reading comprehension from paper and computer screen (2009)Google Scholar
  45. Zhao: Using translation in ESL classrooms: an Asian perspective. Int. J. Innov. Interdiscip. Res. Chengdu Institute Sichuan International Studies University, China (2015). V2 14 2015Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Human Factors and Transport Systems EngineeringCranfield UniversityBedfordUK

Personalised recommendations