Advertisement

Towards a Multi-disciplinary Framing of Diaspora Networks in International Business

  • Maria Elo
  • Indianna Minto-Coy
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

Abstract

The phenomenon of diaspora networks in international business can be approached with a multitude of lenses, positive, negative and disciplinary. Building on the contributions of the book, we find that there is no “one size fits all” but specific, almost customized lenses are needed for particular research problems- and more dialectic approach in addressing the discussions. Diaspora matters are not only conceptually complicated, due to the international, even global dimensions and nuances, but it is also necessary to contextualize better the settings in which diaspora networks act and shape international business and entrepreneurship. The context of a developing country may differ greatly from a developed country and present other mechanisms and flows, just like political transitions and crises. Importantly, the balancing of disciplinary lenses and the mainstreaming of diaspora and migration are issues that are changing. The shift from the deficit and problem view to the agency and opportunity view is in making. The contributions here illustrate how both exist, representing the different sides of the token. Broadening the lenses may involve framings, contexts, transformations, transnationalism, time and timing, position in society, benefits for business and the asset side of diaspora. A more multi-disciplinary understanding is expected to diminish the theory-practice gaps, the danger of bias and misinterpretations and facilitate advancing the body of knowledge with new evidence.

References

  1. Agunias DR, Newland K (2012) Developing a road map for engaging diasporas in development: a handbook for policymakers and practitioners in home and host countries. IOM/MPI, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Brubaker R (2005) The “diaspora” diaspora. Ethnic Racial Stud 28(1):1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0141987042000289997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buckley PJ, Doh JP, Benischke MH (2017) Towards a renaissance in international business research? Big questions, grand challenges, and the future of IB scholarship. J Int Bus Stud 48(9):1045–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen W, Tan J (2009) Understanding transnational entrepreneurship through a network lens: theoretical and methodological considerations. Enterp Theory Pract 33(5):1079–1091.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00335.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chesbrough H (2007) Business model innovation: it’s not just about technology anymore. Strateg Leadersh 35(6):12–17.  https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570710833714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chung HFL, Rose E, Huang PH (2012) Linking international adaptation strategy, immigrant effect, and performance: the case of home-host and cross-market scenario. Int Bus Rev 21(1):40–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2010.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clemens MA, McKenzie D (2014) Why don’t remittances appear to affect growth ? Policy Research working paper no. WPS 6856. World Bank Group, Washington, DC. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/114141468323950998/Why-dont-remittances-appear-to-affect-growth
  8. Cohen R (2008) Global diasporas: an introduction, 2nd edn. Routledge, London.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203928943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crisp R (1991) Aristotle on dialectic. Philosophy 66(258):522–524.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100065177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dahinden J (2016) A plea for the “de-migranticization” of research on migration and integration. Ethnic Racial Stud 39(13):2207–2225.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2015.1124129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Di Trocchio F (2015) Research publication: ethical aspects. In: International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp 529–533). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.11009-8
  12. Elo M (2016a) Against all odds-a diaspora entrepreneur developing Russian and central asian markets. Progress in international business research, vol 11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1745-886220160000011024
  13. Elo M (2016b) Typology of diaspora entrepreneurship: case studies in Uzbekistan. J Int Entrep 14(1):121–155.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-016-0177-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elo M, Hieta H (2017) From ethnic enclaves to transnational entrepreneurs: the American dream of the Finns in Oregon, USA. Int J Entrep Small Bus 31(2).  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2017.084088
  15. Elo M, Harima A, Freiling J (2015) To try or not to try? A story of diaspora entrepreneurship. In: Van Tulder R, Verbeke A, Drogendijk R (eds) The future of global organizing. Emerald Group, Bingley, pp 283–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Enderwick P, Tung RL, Chung HFL (2011) Immigrant effects and international business activity: an overview. J Asia Bus Stud 5(1):6–22.  https://doi.org/10.1108/15587891111100778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Etemad H (2017) Towards a conceptual multilayered framework of international entrepreneurship. J Int Entrep 15(3):229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Faist T (2013) The mobility turn: a new paradigm for the social sciences? Ethnic Racial Stud.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.812229
  19. Ghauri P, Lutz C, Tesfom G (2003) Using networks to solve export-marketing problems of small-and medium-sized firms from developing countries. Eur J Mark 37(5/6):728–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guarnizo LE, Portes A, Haller W (2003) Assimilation and transnationalism: determinants of transnational political action among contemporary migrants. Am J Sociol 108(6):1211 https://doi.org/ArticleCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hedaa L, Törnroos JÅ (2002) Towards a theory of timing: kairology in business networks. In: Adam B, Sabelis I, Whipp R (eds) Making time: time and management in modern organizations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 31–45Google Scholar
  22. Heikkilä EK, Rauhut D (eds) (2015) Marriage migration and multicultural relationships. Institute of MigrationGoogle Scholar
  23. Heinonen M (2013) Migration and the false promise of growth. On Horiz 21(3):197–208.  https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-03-2013-0018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ilhan-Nas T, Sahin K, Cilingir Z (2011) International ethnic entrepreneurship: antecedents, outcomes and environmental context. Int Bus Rev 20(6):614–626.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.02.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kivisto P (2001) Theorizing transnational immigration: a critical review of current efforts. Ethnic Racial Stud 24(4):549–577.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870120049789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kloosterman R, Rath J (2001) Immigrant entrepreneurs in advanced economies: mixed embeddedness further explored. J Ethn Migr Stud 27(2):189–201.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830020041561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kloosterman R, Rath J (2010) Shifting landscapes of immigrant entrepreneurship. In: Open for business: migrant entrepreneurship in OECD countries. OECD, Paris, pp 101–123.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264095830-5-enCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lucas REB (2007) Migration and rural development. J Agric Dev Econ 4(1):99–122 Retrieved from http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/112594/2/ai193e00.pdfGoogle Scholar
  29. Mahroum S (2000) Highly skilled globetrotters: mapping the international migration of human capital. R D Manag 30(1):23–32.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meyer J-B (2001) Network approach versus brain drain: lessons from the Diaspora. Int Migr 39(5):91–110.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2435.00173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meyer D, Shera A (2017) The impact of remittances on economic growth: an econometric model. Economia 18(2):147–155.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econ.2016.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meyer J-B, Wattiaux J-P (2006) Diaspora knowledge networks: vanishing doubts and increasing evidence. Int J Multicult Soc 8(1): 4–24. ISSN 1817-4574. www.unesco.org/shs/ijms/vol8/issue1/art
  33. Minto ID (2009) Diasporas and development – the case of Ireland and the Caribbean. Caribbean Paper #7, Centre for International Governance Innovation, Waterloo, Canada. Available at: https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/caribbean_paper_07-apr3.pdf
  34. Minto-Coy ID (2011) Beyond remittancing: an investigation of the role of telecoms in facilitating and extending the diaspora’s contribution to the Carribbean. Can Foreign Policy J 17(2):129–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Minto-Coy ID (2016) Diaspora engagement for development in the Caribbean. In: Crush J, Walton-Roberts M, Chikanda A (eds) Diasporas, development and governance in the global south conference. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Minto-Coy ID (2018) Marshalling transnational partners for caribbean development: the role of the diaspora. In: Karagiannis N, Mohammed DA (eds) Caribbean realities and endogenous sustainability. University of the West Indies Press, BarbadosGoogle Scholar
  37. Minto-Coy ID, Elo M (2017) Towards an entrepreneurial ecosystem for diaspora engagement. MSBM Bus Rev 3(4):29–30Google Scholar
  38. Orozco M (2004) The Salvadoran diaspora: remittances, transnationalism and government responses. Paper commissioned by the Tomas Rivera Policy Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  39. Oyo S (2016) Diaspora and transnational entrepreneurship in global contexts. IGI GLobal, Hershey, PAGoogle Scholar
  40. Price M, Chacko E (2009) The mixed embeddedness of ethnic entrepreneurs in a new immigrant gateway. J Immigr Refugee Stud 7(3):328–346.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15562940903150105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pruthi S, Wright M, Meyer KE (2009) Staffing venture capital firms’ international operations. Int J Human Resour Manag 20(1):186–205.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190802528649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rath J, Kloosterman R (2000) Outsiders’ business: a critical review of research on immigrant entrepreneurship. Int Migr Rev 34(3):657–681.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2675940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Riddle L, Brinkerhoff J (2011) Diaspora entrepreneurs as institutional change agents: the case of Thamel.com. Int Bus Rev 20(6):670–680.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.02.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Riddle L, Hrivnak GA, Nielsen TM (2010) Transnational diaspora entrepreneurship in emerging markets: bridging institutional divides. J Int Manag 16(4):398–411.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2010.09.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rindova V (2008) Editor’ S comments: publishing theory when you are. Acad Manag Rev 33(2):300–303.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.31193160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sarason Y, Dean T, Dillard JF (2006) Entrepreneurship as the nexus of individual and opportunity: a structuration view. J Bus Ventur 21(3):286–305.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smith R (1993) Aristotle on the uses of dialectic. Synthese 96(3):335–358.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stahl GK, Tung RL (2015) Towards a more balanced treatment of culture in international business studies: the need for positive cross-cultural scholarship. J Int Bus Stud 46(4):391–414.  https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. The Hague Process on Refugees and Migration (2015) The return on investment on migration: what is in it for business? Global Forum on Migration & Development, Turkey 2014–2015Google Scholar
  50. The World Bank (2016) Migration and remittances fact book, 2016. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  51. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481):453–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vermeulen F (2005) On rigor and relevance: fostering dialectic progress in management research. Acad Manag J.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.19573102
  53. World Bank (2013) Inclusion matters: the foundation for shared prosperity, vol 1950. World Bank. doi: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0010-8

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics, Belt & Road Institute of International Business, Shanghai UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Turku School of Economics, University of TurkuTurkuFinland
  3. 3.Migration Institute of FinlandTurkuFinland
  4. 4.Mona School of Business and ManagementThe University of West IndiesMonaJamaica
  5. 5.International Migration Research CentreWilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations