Advertisement

Robotically-assisted Ventral Hernia Repair

  • Ioannis Konstantinidis
  • Byrne Lee
Chapter

Abstract

Since the introduction of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in the early 1990s [1], the benefits of the procedure—decreased postoperative pain, faster recovery with less wound, and overall complication rates, while maintaining recurrence rates equal or less to those of open ventral hernia repair—have led to its widespread adoption. Laparoscopy, however, has its own limitations. The lack of articulation limits the degrees of motion of laparoscopic instruments, and visualization is also limited to two dimensions. As a result, technically demanding maneuvers such as intracorporeal closure of hernia defect or minimally invasive myofascial release have not been widely adopted. This can compromise the outcome of the repair, leading to increased mesh bulging, hernia recurrences, seroma formation, and patient dissatisfaction [2]. Additionally, the tackers and transabdominal sutures used to secure the mesh have been implicated in the occurrence of increased pain and postoperative adhesions.

Keywords

Herniorrhaphy Adhesiolysis Abdominal wall reconstructions 

References

  1. 1.
    LeBlanc KA, Booth WV. Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993;3(1):39–41.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nguyen DH, Nguyen MT, Askenasy EP, Kao LS, Liang MK. Primary fascial closure with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: systematic review. World J Surg. 2014;38(12):3097–104.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schluender S, Conrad J, Divino CM, Gurland B. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia with intracorporeal suturing. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(9):1391–5.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Warren JA, Cobb WS, Ewing JA, Carbonell AM. Standard laparoscopic versus robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(1):324–32.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gonzalez A, Escobar E, Romero R, Walker G, Mejias J, Gallas M, et al. Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair: a multicenter evaluation of clinical outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(3):1342–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gonzalez AM, Romero RJ, Seetharamaiah R, Gallas M, Lamoureux J, Rabaza JR. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with primary closure versus no primary closure of the defect: potential benefits of the robotic technology. Int J Med Robot. 2015;11(2):120–5.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteUSA

Personalised recommendations