Advertisement

Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

  • Michele L. Young
  • Keith Chae Kim
Chapter

Abstract

Indications for the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) remain the same as they have been since the 1991 publication of the NIH Consensus Guidelines: BMI ≥ 40 or BMI 35–39 with one or more obesity-related comorbidities [1]. There are data, however, that support the benefits and safety of the RYGB in patients with a lower BMI with metabolic burden, particularly diabetes, suggesting that these indications should be reconsidered [2]. In reviews of comparative studies looking at robotic versus laparoscopic approaches to the RYGB, two trends seem to consistently stand out: (1) major complications, particularly leaks, tend to be lower in the robotic groups; and (2) the operative times tend to be longer in the robotic groups [3]. The longer operative times should be a consideration in terms of minimizing added risks to the patient and minimizing impact on productivity; the operative times can be considerably longer. In transitioning to a robotic approach to the RYGB, the intention should be to progress to performing all RYGBs robotically, so the indications for a robotic RYGB should be the same as for RYGB in general.

Keywords

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass RYGB Bariatric surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    NIH Conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Consensus development conference panel. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115:956–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cohen RV, Pinheiro JC, Schiavon CA, Salles JE, Wajchenberg BL, Cummings DE. Effects of gastric bypass surgery in patients with type 2 diabetes and only mild obesity. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:1420–8.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bailey JG, Hayden JA, Davis PJ, Liu RY, Haardt D, Ellsmere J. Robotic versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in obese adults ages 18 to 65 years: a systematic review and economic analysis. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:414–26.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rosser JC Jr, Gentile DA, Hanigan K, Danner OK. The effect of video game “warm-up” on performance of laparoscopic surgery tasks. JSLS. 2012;16:3–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fourman MM, Saber AA. Robotic bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:483–8.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Markar SR, Karthikesalingam AP, Venkat-Ramen V, Kinross J, Ziprin P. Robotic vs. laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients: systematic review and pooled analysis. Int J Med Robot. 2011;7:393–400.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Metabolic and Obesity SurgeryFlorida Hospital Celebration HealthCelebrationUSA

Personalised recommendations