All About Wave Equations

  • Bahman Zohuri


The fundamental definition of the terminology that is knowns to us as a wave consists of a series of examples of various different situations, whichthat we are referring to as waves. However, the oOne feature that is a common denominator characteristic for of wave types of waves is that they they propagate in one or more other directions, and they create some kind of “disturbance” in their propagation path. of their propagations, Ffor example, in the case of water waves, we can observe the elevation of the water’s surface, and in case of sound waves, we experience, pressure variations in its path of traveling, with a velocity characteristic of the medium that the wave goes through. However, for us tTo be able to explain describe a wave, however, we need a more definitive way of to describeing thea wave with usinge of mathematics, and primarily the concept of partial differential equationss type scenarios, which goes beyond the level of most any basic text book.


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    G.H. Darwin, The Tides and Kindred Phenomena in the Solar System (John Murray, London, 1898), pp. 21–31zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tsunamis are normally associated with earthquakes, but landslides, volcanic eruptions, and meteorite impacts all have the potential to generate a tsunamiGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Proudman, J. (1953). Dynamical Oceanography. London: Methuen. §117 (p. 225). OCLC 223124129Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.R. Merian, Ueber die Bewegung tropfbarer Flüssigkeiten in Gefässen [on the motion of drippable liquids in containers] (thesis) (in German). Basel: Schweighauser. OCLC 46229431 (1828)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pierce, T. (2006). Marine and coastal services abbreviations and definitions (PDF). National Weather Service, Office of Climate, Water, and Weather Services. Archived from the original (pdf) on May 17, 2008. Retrieved April 19, 2017 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    This behaves in a fashion similar to a tidal bore where incoming tides are funneled into a shallow, narrowing river via a broad bay. The funnel-like shape increases the height of the tide above normal, and the flood appears as a relatively rapid increase in the water level.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    J.R. Reitz, F.J. Milford, R.W. Christy, Foundations of Electromagnetic Theory, 3rd edn. (Addison – Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, 1979)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd edn. (John Wiley Publisher, New York, 1990), pp. 27–29Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    O.L. Brill, B. Goodman, Am. J. Phys. 35, 832 (1967). for a detailed discussion of casualty in the Coulomb gauge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Konstantin, Meyl, Scalar Waves., INDEL GmbH, Verlagsabteilung ISBN 3-9802542-4-0
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    D. Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics, 3rd edn. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1999)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H.E. Ensle, The Electromagnetic Universe, 2nd edn. (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    B. Zohuri, Plasma Physics and Controlled Thermonuclear Reactions Drive Fusion Energy, 1st edn (Springer Publisher, 2016)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    B. Zohuri, Dimensional Analysis and Self-Similarity Methods for Engineers and Scientists, 1st edn. (Springer Publisher, 2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 2rd edn. (John Wiley Publisher, 1975), pp. 681–790Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Y. Aharonov, D. Bohm, Significance of electromagnetic potentials in the quantum theory. Phys. Rev. 115, 485–491 (1959)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    M.A. Steane, Relativity Made Relativity Easy (Oxford Publishing Company, 2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    N. Tesla, My Inventions, V. The magnifying transmitter. Electrical Experimenter, June 1919, p. 112. Other articles can be found in Reference 26Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    T.E. Bearden, Solutions to Tesla’s Secrets and the Soviet Tesla Weapons (Tesla Book Company, Millbrae, 1981)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    C.N. Yang, R.L. Mills, Conservation of isotopic spin and isotopic gauge invariance. Phys. Rev. 96, 191–195 (1954)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
    J. Y. Dea, Instantaneous Interactions. (Proc. 1986 ITS)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    S.J. Gates Jr., Mathematica Analysis of Physical System (Van Nostrand Reinhold, Edited by Ronald Nickkens, 1985)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    L.D. Landau, E.N. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics Non-Relativistic Theory (Addison-Wesley, 1958)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    D. Forster, Hydrodynamic Fluctuations, Broken Symmetry, and Correlation Functions (W. A. Benjamin, Inc., Reading, 1975)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Panofsky and Philips, Classical Electricity and Magnetism, Second Edition (2005-01-26) (Dover Publications, 1656)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    R.C. Gelinas, Cruel-Free Vector Potential Effects in Simply Connected Space (Casner and Gelinas Co., Inc. !985, International Tesla Society, Inc), pp. 4–43Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    J.Y. Dea, Scalar fields: Their prediction from classical electromagnetism and interpretation from quantum mechanics, in The Proceeding of the Tesla Centennial Symposium, an IEEE Centennial Activity, (Colorado College, Colorado Springs, 1984), pp. 94–98Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    E.T. Whittaker, One the partial differential equations of mathematical physics. Math. Ann. 57, 333–355 (1903)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Whittaker, E. T., 1903 and 1904, ibid. For the original basis of scalar interferometry and its creation of my kind of electromagnetic field, potential, and wave in the interference zone.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    M. , W. Evans, P.K. Anastasovski, T.E. Bearden, et al., On Whittaker’s representation of electromagnetic entity in vacuo, part V: The production of transverse field and energy by scalar interferometry. J. New Energy 4(3). Winter 1999, p. 76 for mathematical proof of scalar interferometry. There are several other AIAS papers in the same issue of JNE, dealing with interferometry and with the implications of the Whittaker papersGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    This is a claim by T. E. Bearden and his book of Fer De Lance, A Briefing on Soviet Scalar Electromagnetic Weapons and not this author, so it is up to reader how they are taking this claim. “As an example, the U.S.S. Skylark surface companion of the Thresher, was beset by mysterious “jamming” of multiple types of EM systems in multiple bands. So bad was it, that it required more than an hour to get an emergency message to Naval Headquarters that the Thresher was in serious difficulty. Later, as the scalar interferometry field went away, all the EM systems aboard the Skylark resumed normal functioning. The Skylark was in fact in a “splatter zone” of the underwater interference zone around the Thresher.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    R.G. Chambers, Physics. Rev. Lett. 5, 3 (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    W. Tai Tsun, C.N. Yang, Concept of nonintegrable phase factors and global formulation of gauge fields. Phys. Rev. D 12(15), 3845–3857 (1975)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    R.P. Feynman, R.B. Leighton, M. Sands, The Feynman lectures on physics. II(Section 15–5), 15-8–15-14Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    J.D. Jackson, Classical electrodynamics, in John Wiley Publisher, 2rd edn., (1975), p. 223Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    P.A. Kossey et al., Artificial Ionospheric mirrors (AIM), in Ionospheric Modification and its Potential to Enhance or Degrade the Performance of Military Systems, (AGARD Conference Proceedings 485, October 1990), pp. 17A–171AGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    A. Robinson and J. Holland, Quantum Wave Theory—A Model of Unity, Nature, 2011Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    C. Vuille, Schrodinger’s equation and general relativity. J. Math. Phys. 41(8), 5256–5261 (August 2000)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    E.T. Whittaker, An expression of the electromagnetic field due to electrons by means of two scalar potential functions. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 1, 367–372 (1904)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    H.A. Lorentz, A. Einstein, H. Minkowski, H. Weyl, The Principle of Relativity: A Collection of Original Memoirs on the Special and General Theory of Relativity (Dover, New York, 1952)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    L. Brillouin, A. Sommerfeld, Wave Propagation and Group Velocity (Academic Press, New York, 1960)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    M. Born, E. Wolf, Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference, and Diffraction of Light, 7th edn. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifschitz, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media, 2nd edn. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1984)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    L.J. Wang, A. Kuzmich, A. Dogariu, Gain-assisted superluminal light propagation. Nature 406, 277–279 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    W.A. Rodrigues, J.Y. Lu, On the existence of undistorted progressive waves (UPWs) of arbitrary speeds in nature. Found. Phys. 27, 435–508 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    J.E. Maiorino, W.A. Rodrigues Jr., What is superluminal wave motion? Sci. & Tech. Mag 2 (1999).
  55. 55.
  56. 56.
    R. Courant, D. Hilbert, Methods of Mathematical Physics, vol 2 (Wiley, New York, 1966), p. 760Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    H. Bateman, Electrical and Optical Wave Motion (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1915)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    A. O. Barut, G. D. Maccarrone, and E. Recami, On the shape of tachyons, Nuovo Cimento A 71, 509–533 (1982), and refs. therein; see also E. Recami and G. D. Maccarrone, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 28, 151–157 (1980) and 37, 345–352 (1983); P. Caldirola, G. D. Maccarrone, and E. Recami, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 29, 241–250 (1980); G. D. Maccarrone, M. Pavsic, and E. Recami, Nuovo Cimento B 73, 91–111 (1983)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    E. Recami, M. Zamboni-Rached, C.A. Dartora, The X-shaped, localized field generated by a superluminal electric charge, LANL archives e-print physics/0210047. Phys. Rev. E 69, 027602 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    A.O. Barut, A. Grant, Quantum particle-like configurations of the electromagnetic field. Found. Phys. Lett. 3, 303–310 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    A.O. Barut, A.J. Bracken, Particle-like configurations of the electromagnetic field: An extension of de Broglie’s ideas. Found. Phys. 22, 1267–1285 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    J.N. Brittingham, Focus wave modes in homogeneous Maxwell’s equations: Transverse electric mode. J. Appl. Phys. 54, 1179–1189 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    A. Sezginer, A general formulation of focus wave modes. J. Appl. Phys. 57, 678–683 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    H. E. Hernández-Figueroa, M. Zamboni-Rached, and E. Recami (eds.),Localized Waves, John Wiley: New York, 2008.), 386 pagesGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    E. Recami, Classical tachyons and possible applications. Rivista Nuovo Cimento 9(6), 1–178 (1986). issue 6, and refs. thereinMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    J.-Y. Lu, J.F. Greenleaf, Nondiffracting X-waves: Exact solutions to free-space scalar wave equation and their finite aperture realizations. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 39, 19–31 (1992). and refs. thereinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    J.-Y. Lu, J.F. Greenleaf, Experimental verification of nondiffracting X-waves. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 39, 441–446 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    J.A. Stratton, “Electromagnetic Theory”, Page 356, McGraw-Hill (New York, 1941)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    R.W. Ziolkowski, I.M. Besieris, A.M. Shaarawi, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 33, 7227–7254 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    G. Shan, Quantum superluminal communication does not result in casual loop. CERN Preprint. (1999a)Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    G. Shan, Quantum superluminal communication must exist. CERN preprint. (1999b)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    J.-Y. Lu, J. F. Greenleaf, and E. Recami, Limited diffraction solutions to Maxwell (and Schrödinger) equations, LANL archives e-print physics/9610012, Report INFN/FM–96/01, Instituto Nazionale de Fisica Nucleare, Frascati, Italy Oct. 1996; E. Recami: On localized X-shaped superluminal solutions to Maxwell equations, Physica A 252, 586–610 (1998), and refs. therein; see also R. W. Ziolkowski, I. M. Besieris, and A. M. Shaarawi, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 75 (1993); J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 33, 7227–7254 (2000)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    R.W. Ziolkowski, I.M. Besieris, A.M. Shaarawi, Aperture realizations of exact solutions to homogeneous wave equations. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 75–87 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    A.M. Shaarawi, I.M. Besieris, On the superluminal propagation of X-shaped localized waves. J. Phys. A 33, 7227–7254 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    A.M. Shaarawi, I.M. Besieris, Relativistic causality and superluminal signaling using X-shaped localized waves. J. Phys. A 33, 7255–7263 (2000). and refs. therein.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    M. Zamboni-Rached, E. Recami, H.E. Hernández-Figueroa, New localized superluminal solutions to the wave equations with finite total energies and arbitrary frequencies. Eur. Phy. J. D 21, 217–228 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    A.P.L. Barbero, H. E. Hernández Figuerao, and E. Recami, On the propagation speed of evanescent modes , Phys. Rev. E 62, 8628 (2000), and refs. therein; see also A. M. Shaarawi and I. M. Besieris, Phys. Rev. E 62, 7415 (2000)Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    H.M. Brodowsky, W. Heitmann, G. Nimtz, Phys. Lett. A 222, 125 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    W.A. Rodrigues, J.Y. Lu, On the existence of undistorted progressive waves (UPWs) of arbitrary speeds in nature. Found. Phys. 27, 435–508 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    P. Saari, K. Reivelt, Evidence of X-shaped propagation-invariant localized light waves. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4135–4138 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    P. Bowlan, H. Valtna-Lukner, et al., Measurement of the spatiotemporal electric field of ultrashort superluminal Bessel-X pulses. Optics and Photonics News. 20(12), 42Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    A. Ciattoni and C. Conti, Quantum electromagnetic X-waves 0704.0442 v1
  83. 83.
    S., C. Frank, Waves (Berkeley Physics Course Volume 3), 1st edn. (McGraw-Hill, 1968)Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Recami, E. and Zamboni-Rached, M. (2011) Non-diffracting waves, and Frozen Waves: An introduction, 121 pages online in Geophysical Imaging with Localized Waves, Sanya, China 2011 [UCSC, S. Cruz, Cal.], and refs, therein; available at Accessed 27 Apr 2013
  85. 85.
    Recami, E., Zamboni-Rached, M., Hernandez-Figueroa H. E., et al. (2011) Method and Apparatus for Producing Stationary (Intense) Wavefields of arbitrary shape. Patent, Application No. US-2011/0100880Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    E. Recami, M. Zamboni-Rached and H. E. Hernández-Figueroa, Localized waves: A historical and scientific introduction., arXiv:0708.1655v2 [physics.gen-ph] 16 Aug 2007Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    A.C. Newell, J.V. Molone, Nonlinear Optics (Addison & Wesley, Redwood City, 1992)Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    M. Zamboni-Rached, H.E. Hernández-Figueroa, E. Recami, Chirped optical X-shaped pulses in material media. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A21, 2455–2463 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    J.-Y. Lu, J. Cheng, J. Wang, High frame rate imaging system for limited diffraction array beam imaging with square-wave aperture weightings. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 53(10), 1796–1812 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    J.-Y. Lu, J.F. Greenleaf, Diffraction-limited beams and their applications for ultrasonic imaging and tissue characterization. Proc. of SPIE 1733, 92–119 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    J.Y. Lu, H. Zou, J.F. Greenleaf, Biomedical ultrasound beam forming. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 20(5), 403–428, 43, 44 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    J.Y. Lu, Limited-diffraction beams for high-frame-rate imaging, chapter 5, in Non-Diffracting Waves, ed. by H. E. Hernández-Figueroa, E. Recami, M. Zamboni-Rached (Eds), (John Wiley), p. 2008Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bahman Zohuri
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of New Mexico, Galaxy Advanced Engineering, Inc.AlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations