Advertisement

Shockwave Oscillation Under Critical Starting Mach Number in Hypersonic Inlet

  • Pengfei Xiong
  • Hanchen Bai
  • Xiaofei Zhai
  • Jun Chen
  • Zhenfeng Wang
Conference paper

Abstract

The motivation of this paper was to study the characteristics of start-up and the feature of shockwave under low Mach number in hypersonic inlet. The characteristics of flow field and shockwave at the critical starting Mach number (Ma3.8) without back pressure were numerically studied in the hypersonic inlet in which the design condition was Ma6. The results showed that the flow field and shockwave were unstable, and they were under some certain periodic oscillation state at the critical starting Mach number (Ma3.8). The total mass flow rate between inflow and outlet, the mass flow of throat, and the mass average Mach number of outlet all also showed periodic oscillation. Unmatched mass flow that passed through the throat that could not all pass through the exit of isolator was the induced reason of periodic oscillation. The block of the max mass flux flow through the area of throat was the main factor that caused the periodic oscillation of flow field and shockwave. The unmatched mass flux in internal channel leads to periodic “split out” and “swallow in” of “separation bubble” from the internal channel, which formed the periodic oscillation of flow field and shockwave.

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by Grant No. 51606212 of the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

References

  1. 1.
    A.R. Weiting, Exploratory study of transient unstart phenomena in a three-dimensional fixed-geometry scramjet engine[R], NASA TND-8156, 1976Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. Shmura, T. Mitani, N. Sakuranaka, et al., Load oscillations caused by unstart of hypersonic wind tunnels and engines[J]. J. Propuls. Power 14(3), 348–353 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.R. McClintion, J.L. Hunt, R.H. Ricketts, et al., Airbreathing hypersonic technology vision vehicles and development dreams[R], AIAA-1999-4978, 1999Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H.J. Tan, S. Sun, Z.L. Yin, Oscillatory flows of rectangular hypersonic inlet unstart caused by downstream mass-flow choking[J]. J. Propuls. Power 25(1), 138–147 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H.J. Tan, R.W. Guo, Experimental study of the unstable unstarted condition of a hypersonic inlet at Mach 8[J]. J. Propuls. Power 23(4), 783–788 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.L. Wagner, K.B. Yuceil, N.T. Clemens, PIV measurements of unstart of an inlet-isolator model in a Mach 5 flow[R], AIAA-2009-4209, 2009Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.L. Wagner, A. Valdivia, K.B. Yuceil, et al., An experimental investigation of supersonic inlet unstart[R], AIAA-2007-4352, 2007Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P.E. Rodi, S. Emami, C.A. Trexler, Unsteady pressure behavior in a ramjet/scramjet inlet[J]. J. Propuls. Power 12(3), 486–493 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W.R. Hawkins, E.J. Marquart, Two-dimensional generic inlet unstart detection at Mach2.5-5.0[R], AIAA-95-6016, 1995Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K.S. McDaniel, J.R. Edwards, Three-dimensional simulation of thermal choking in a model scramjet combustor[R], AIAA-2001-0382, 2001Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.T. Chang, D.R. Yu, W. Bao, Characteristic analysis of unstart/restart of hypersonic inlets caused by variations of attack angle of freestream[J]. J. Aerospace Power 23(5), 816–821 (2008)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A.Y. Yu, D.W. Yang, J. Wu, A numerical research on forecasting shock oscillations of scram-inlets[C], in The Fifteenth National Conference of Shock and Shock Tube, Anhui, China, 2010Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pengfei Xiong
    • 1
  • Hanchen Bai
    • 1
  • Xiaofei Zhai
    • 1
  • Jun Chen
    • 1
  • Zhenfeng Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory of Hypervelocity Aerodynamics InstituteCARDCMianyangChina

Personalised recommendations