The Falcon, the Helios, Two Scenarios, and Framework
Aviation is the safest form of transportation. Expert performers – narrators, Ifaistos Limnios, as the pilot, and Megas Alexandros, as the investigator – explain the two paradigmatic flights and two scenarios to formulate the reference framework of the book, for effective problem-solving and handling rules and exceptions. The “shaking Falcon VIP flight” connects the concept of silence with accountability; a major incident of rapid descent without controls occurred, but the pilot was able to hold the shaking aircraft and to prevent it from crashing. Another paradigmatic flight Helios 522, silent ghost plane, signaled the rethinking of the silence concept inside and outside the plane, as the “no reply” activated the Renegade alert in the Greek FIR Space. It was a challenge for the sterile cockpit rule. In the scenario of silence, several accidents have shown that crew members’ failure to speak up can have devastating consequences with a risk to flight safety. A second major scenario was about the experience of hesitation in interaction that may leave incomplete information and truncated messages, generate uncertainty, and result to insufficient knowledge in the cockpit-controller interaction. The chapter explains flights and scenarios as the instrument for grounded theory to be applied and lessons from protocol analysis to develop. Cockpit acts of conversation are consistent with individual members’ tacit knowledge. Thus, human operators in flights must build mutual trust with all the other participants. The framework concludes with human factors explanation of the interactions among humans and other elements of a system and applies design principles to optimize human well-being and overall system performance.
KeywordsFalcon VIP flight Helios 522 Silence Hesitation ASRS Renegade alert Sterile cockpit Mutual trust
- Argyle, M. (1991). Cooperation: The basis of sociability. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- ASRS (Aviation Safety Reporting System). (2013, January). What would you have done? Callback 396 (situation #4). NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System. Available at http://asrs.arc.nasa.gov/publications/callback/cb_396.html
- Barber, B. (1983). The logic and limits of trust. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Barnard, C. (1938/2005). The functions of the executive (30th anniversary ed.). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Cicourel, A. (1973). Cognitive sociology: Language and meaning in social interaction. Harmodsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Collins, R. (2005). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Dance, F. E. X. (1967). A helical model of communication. In F. E. X. Dance, (ed). Human Communication Theory. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
- Dekker, S. W. A. (2010). Pilots, controllers and mechanics on trial: Cases, concerns and countermeasures. International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies, 10(1), 31–50.Google Scholar
- Dekker, S. W. A. (2012). Just culture: Balancing safety and accountability (2nd ed.). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Deutsch, M. (1962). Cooperation and trust: Some theoretical notes. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 275–319). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
- DeVito, J. A. (2011). Human communication the basic course (12th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Edwards, E. (1988). Introductory overview. In E. Wiener & D. Nagel (Eds.), Human factors in aviation (pp. 3–25). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
- EUROCONTROL. (2008). What is ‘human factors’ all about? Eurocontrol white paper. Online. Available http://www.eurocontrol.int/eec/public/standard_page/human_factors_what_is_it.html. Accessed 3 Nov 2011.
- Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behaviour. New York: Doubleday & Co. Anchor Books. (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972).Google Scholar
- Golembiewski, R. T., & McConkie, M. (1975). The centrality of interpersonal trust in group processes. In G. L. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of group processes (pp. 131–185). London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Griffioen, H. (2009). Air crash investigations: The crash of helios airways flight 522. (Lulu.com Edition).
- Hellenic Air Accident Investigation and Security Board (HAAISB). (2006). Helios airways flight HCY522, boeing 737-31S at Grammatiko Hellas on 14 August 2005. Athens: Ministry of Transportation & Communications.Google Scholar
- (ICAO) International Civil Aviation Organization. (2011a). State of global aviation safety – 2011. Montreal: ICAO Publication. Online. Available http://skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/1723.pdf. Accessed 3 Nov 2011.
- (ICAO) International Civil Aviation Organization. (2011b). Strategic objectives: Safety. Online. Available http://www.icao.int/safety/Pages/default.asp. Accessed 3 Nov 2011.
- Kendon, A. (1977). Studies in the behavior of social interaction studies in the behavior of face-to-face interaction (pp. viii + 260). Lisse: Peter De Ridder Press (Vol. 6, Studies in Semiotics. Research Center for Language and Semiotic Studies, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN).Google Scholar
- Laios, L., & Giannacourou, M. (1995). Human factors issues of advanced ATC systems. In N. McDonald, N. Johnston, & R. Fuller (Eds.), Applications of psychology to the aviation system. Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the European Association for Aviation Psychology (EAAP) (Vol. 1, Chap. 17).Google Scholar
- Leydesdorff, L. (2016).Information, meaning, and intellectual organization in networks of inter-human communication. In C. R. Sugimoto (Ed.), Theories of informetrics: A Festschrift in honor of blaise cronin (forthcoming).Google Scholar
- Michaelides-Mateou, S., & Mateou, A. (2010). Flying in the face of criminalization; the safety implications of prosecuting aviation professionals for accidents. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Moray, N. P., & Huey, B. M. (Eds.). (1988). Human factors research and nuclear safety. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Romanian Civil Aviation Inspectorate (RCAI). (2000). Final Report on the accident of the Falcon 900B SX-ECH- 14 September 1999. Bucharest.Google Scholar
- Salem, J. P. (2009). The complexity of human communication. Cresskill: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
- Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1949). A mathematical model of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
- Tsolakis, A. D. (2013). Dare! A way of life (Tolma! Enas Tropos Zois). Athens: 11Aviation Publications.Google Scholar