Nature of the Iranian Reform Movement: Existence and Causes

  • Majid Mohammadi


The third chapter documents the emergence of a reform movement in Iran in the late 1990s. The first section raises a number of more general questions pertaining to such a movement in the context of an authoritarian political regime. The first question relates to the issue of whether we can indeed speak of a social movement in the context of Iranian society in the post-revolutionary era. The second section assumes the presence of a reform movement in Iran in the second half of the 1990s and then proceeds to “prove” its existence by referring to the noticeable increase in non-governmental organizations, the noticeable increase in the independent press, the diversity of narratives reflecting different ideologies, policies and lifestyles, powerful counter-movements, dramatic changes of individual appearance in public, dramatic decreases in youth appearances in religious places in the hands of people who represent ideologized religion, and electoral successes by reformist candidates.

The second section of this chapter reviews different explanations for the nature of this movement. The main issues, theory of state, distinguished group, theory of citizenship and expected outcome will be examined in each possible explanation. This section is an attempt to set out different social movement theories as explanations for the Iranian scene. Leadership, success and political implications such as destabilization are discussed in the following sections. The conclusion is an attempt to relate my empirical findings to a broader conceptual and interpretive agenda.


  1. Bāghi, Emaduddin. 2000. Tragedy of Democracy in Iran. Tehran: Nashr-e Nai.Google Scholar
  2. Bayat, Asef. 1994. Squatters and the State: Back Street Politics in the Islamic Republic. Middle East Report (November–December) 191: 10–14.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 1997. Street Politics: Poor People’s Movements in Iran. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bickford, Susan. 1999. Reconfiguring Pluralism: Identity and Institutions in the Inegalitarian Polity. American Journal of Political Science 43 (1): 86–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calhoun, Craig. 1993. New Social Movements of the Early Nineteenth Century. Social Science History 17 (3): 385–427.Google Scholar
  6. Couto, Richard A. 1993. Narrative, Free Space, and Political Leadership in Social Movements. Journal of Politics 55 (1): 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delanty, Gerard. 2001. Citizenship in a Global Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dryzek, John S. 1996. Political Inclusion and the Dynamics of Democratization. American Political Science Review 90 (1): 475–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edwards, Bob, and Sam Marullo. 1995. Organizational Mortality in a Declining Social Movement: The Demise of Peace Movement Organizations in the End of the Cold War Era. American Sociological Review 60 (6): 908–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elster, Jon, Claus Offe, and Ulrich K. Preuss with Frank Boenker, Ulrike Goetting, and Friedbert W. Rueb. 1988. Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies: Rebuilding the Ship at Sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ganji, Akbar. 1999. Grey Highness. Tehran: Tarh-e No.Google Scholar
  12. Henkin, Louis. 1996. The Age of Rights. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Jacobson, David. 1996. Rights Across Borders: Immigration and the Decline of Citizenship. London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Meyer, David S., and Suzanne Staggenborg. 1996. Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Political Opportunity. American Journal of Sociology 101 (6): 1628–1660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tarrow, Sidney G. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action, and Mass Politics in the Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Tilly, Charles. 1984. Social Movements and National Politics. In State-Making and Social Movements: Essays in History and Theory, ed. Charles Bright and Susan Harding, 297–317. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 1995. To Explain Political Processes. American Journal of Sociology 100 (6): 1594–1610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Majid Mohammadi
    • 1
  1. 1.Radio Free EuropeStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations