Advertisement

How to Measure Success

  • Rebecca Pearson
Chapter

Abstract

To determine the success of lung transplantation it is necessary to assess both survival rates and the quality of life data. The current median survival rate for patients post lung transplant is 6.0 years however this rate varies according to primary diagnosis and type of transplant. For certain conditions such as emphysema the survival benefit of transplantation remains unclear. Hence the potential improvement in quality of life becomes a driving factor to undergo lung transplantation. Quality of life outcomes must be considered as a measure of success. Several studies have illustrated a significant improvement in patients’ health-related quality of life up to 3–5 years post lung transplant as well as an improvement in functional status 12 months post transplantation. Results are encouraging for return to work and societal participation after lung transplant and highlight areas for transplant units to improve advocacy and support for patients in re-employment after transplantation.

Keywords

Lung transplantation Quality of life Surveys and questionnaires Transplant recipients Treatment outcome 

References

  1. 1.
    Eskander A, Waddell TK, Faughnan ME, Chowdhury N, Singer LG. BODE index and quality of life in advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease before and after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011;30:1334–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yusen R. Survival and quality of life of patients undergoing lung transplant. Clin Chest Med. 2011;32:253–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chambers DC, Yusen RD, Cherikh WS, Goldfarb SB, Kucheryavaya AY, Khusch K, Levvey BJ, Lund LH, Meiser B, Rossano JW, Stehlik J. The registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: thirty-fourth adult lung and heart-lung transplantation report-2017;focus theme: allograft ischaemic time. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36:1047–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hart A, Smith JM, Skeans MA, et al. Annual report of the U.S organ procurement and transplantation network and the scientific registry of transplant recipients: kidney. Am J Transplant. 2016;16(Suppl 2):11–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    ANZOD Registry. 2016 annual report. Chap. 13: Transplant outcome. Australia and New Zealand dialysis and transplant registry. Adelaide. 2016. http://www.anzdata.org.au.
  6. 6.
    Yusen R. Technology and outcomes assessment in lung transplantation. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2009;6:128–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kotloff RM, Thabut G. Lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184:159–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thabut G, Mal H. Outcomes of lung transplantation. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9:2684–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lahzami S, Bridevaux PO, Soccal PM, Wellinger J, Robert JH, Ris HB, Aubert JD. Survival impact of lung transplantation for COPD. Eur Respir J. 2010;36:74–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Orens JB, Estenne M, Arcasoy S, Conte JV, Corris P, Egan JJ, Egan T, Keshavjee S, Knoop C, Kotloff R, Martinez FJ, Nathan S, Palmer S, Patterson A, Singer L, Snell G, Studer S, Vachiery JL, Glanville AR. International guidelines for the selection of lung transplant candidates: 2006 update—a consensus report from the pulmonary scientific council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006;25:745–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    World Health Organization. WHOQOL. Measuring quality of life. http://www.who.int/mental_health/media/68.pdf.
  12. 12.
    Curtis JR, Martin DP, Martin T. Patient-assessed health outcomes in chronic lung disease. What they are, how do they help us and where do we go from here? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;156:1032–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leidy NK. Using functional status to assess treatment outcomes. Chest. 1994;106:1645–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mor V, Laliberte L, Morris JN, Wiemann M. The Karnofsky performance scale – an examination of its reliability and validity in the research setting. Cancer. 1984;53:2002–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Genoa L, Whitson HE, Zaas D, Sanders LL, Schmader KE. Functional status after lung transplantation in older adults in the post-allocation score era. Am J Transplant. 2013;13:157–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singer LG, Chowdhury NA, Faughnan ME, Granton J, Keshavjee S, Marras TK, Tullis E, Waddell TK, Tomlinson G. Effects of recipient age and diagnosis on health-related quality-of-life benefit of lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192:965–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Singer LG, Katz PP, Soong A, Shrestha P, Huang D, Ho J, Mindo M, Greenland JR, Hays SR, Golden J, Kukreja J, Kleinhenz ME, Shah RJ, Blanc PD. Effect of lung transplantation on health-related quality of life in the era of lung allocation score: a U.S prospective cohort study. Am J Transplant. 2017;17:1334–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Seiler A, Klaghofer R, Ture M, Komossa K, Martin-Soelch C, Jenewein J. A systematic review of health-related quality of life and psychological outcomes after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35:195–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kunsebeck HW, Kugler C, Fischer S, Simon AR, Gottlieb J, Welte T, Haverich A, Strueber M. Quality of life and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome in patients after lung transplantation. Prog Transplant. 2007;17:136–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Law M. Participation in the occupations of everyday life, 2002 distinguished scholar lecture. Am J Occup Ther. 2002;56:640–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hathaway DK, Winsett RP, Johnson C, Tolley EA, Hartwig M, Milstead J, Wicks MN, Gaber AO. Post kidney transplant quality of life prediction models. Clin Transpl. 1998;12:168–74.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    De Baere C, Delva D, Kloeck A, Remans K, Vanrenterghem Y, Verleden G, Vanhaecke J, Nevens F, Dobbels F. Return to work and social participation: does type of organ transplantation matter? Transplantation. 2010;89:1009–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Paris W, Diercks M, Bright J, Zamora M, Kesten S, Scavuzzo M, Paradis I. Return to work after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1998;17:430–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Suhling H, Knuth C, Haverich A, Lingner H, Welte T, Gottlieb J. Employment after lung transplantation – a single-center cross-sectional study. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112:213–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Petrucci L, Ricotti S, Michelini I, Vitulo P, Oggionni T, Cascina A, D’Armini AM, Goggi C, Campana C, Vigano M, Dalla-Toffola E, Tinelli C, Klersy C. Return to work after thoracic organ transplantation in a clinically-stable population. Eur J Heart Fail. 2007;9:1112–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cicutto L, Braidy C, Moloney S, Hutcheon M, Holness DL, Downey GP. Factors affecting attainment of paid employment after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2004;23:481–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cumming K, O’Brien L, Harris J. Predictors of employment participation following lung transplant. Aust Occup Ther J. 2016;63:347–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Carter JM, Winsett RP, Rager D, Hathaway DK. A center-based approach to a transplant program. Prog Transplant. 2000;10:204–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rebecca Pearson
    • 1
  1. 1.Lung Transplant UnitSt. Vincent’s HospitalDarlinghurstAustralia

Personalised recommendations