Advertisement

The Political Philosophy of Science in Historical Perspective: The Road Through Popper and Polanyi to the Present

  • Stephen Turner
Chapter

Abstract

One of Ian C. Jarvie’s most interesting contributions is his discussion of the thinking of Karl Popper and Michael Polanyi on the nature and workings of the scientific community and their relation to politics (Philosophy of Science 68(4): 545–564, 2001). The self-image these thinkers contributed to still lingers, but their accounts capture a historical moment that has passed and was idealized even when they were written. In this chapter, I examine this tradition and identify the central themes which dominated this literature and ask the question of how this history is relevant today. The answer will perhaps be surprising: despite the fact that the Left of the past held positions that are the opposites of the positions of the present participatory Left, the considerations that motivated the older Left remain.

References

  1. Alexopoulos, Golfo. 2017. Illness and Inhumanity in Stalin’s Gulag. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernal, John D. 1939. The Social Function of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Buckle, Henry Thomas. 1924. History of Civilization in England. 2nd ed. New York and London: D. Appleton and Company.Google Scholar
  4. Bukharin, Nikolai Ivanovich. 1969 [1921]. Historical Materialism: A System of Sociology. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. Accessed April 10, 2017. https://www.marxists.org/archive/bukharin/works/1921/histmat/intro.htm.
  5. Comte, Auguste. 1864. Cours de philosophie positive [1830–42]. Paris: Bachelier.Google Scholar
  6. Conant, James B. 1947. On Understanding Science: An Historical Approach. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Condorcet, Marie Jean Antoine Nicolas Cariat, marquis de. 1976 [1793]. Fragment on the New Atlantis, or Combined Efforts of the Human Species for the Advancement of Science. In Condorcet: Selected Writings, ed. Keith M. Baker, 283–300. Indianapolis, IN: The Bobbs-Merrill Co.Google Scholar
  8. Hogben, Lancelot. 1957. Statistical Theory: The Relationship of Probability, Credibility and Error. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
  9. Huxley, Julian. 1932. A Scientist among the Soviets. New York: Harper & Bothers Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Jarvie, Ian C. 2001. Science in a Democratic Republic. Philosophy of Science 68 (4): 545–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kitcher, Phillip. 2001. Science, Truth and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mill, John Stuart. 1978 [1859]. On Liberty. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  13. Pearson, Karl. 1888. The Ethic of Free Thought: A Selection of Essays and Lectures. London: T. Fisher Unwin.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 1905. National Life: From the Standpoint of Science. London: Adam and Charles Black.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 1937 [1892]. The Grammar of Science. London: J. M. Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
  16. Polanyi, Michael. 1951. The Logic of Liberty: Reflections and Rejoinders. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Porter, Theodore. 2004. Karl Pearson: The Scientific Life in a Statistical Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Stark, Johannes. 1938. The Pragmatic and the Dogmatic Spirit in Physics. Nature 1 (141): 770–772. First published as ‘Weisse Juden’ in der Wissenschaft. Das Schwarze Korps, 15 July 1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Turner, Stephen. 2003. The Third Science War. Social Studies of Science 33 (4): 581–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations