Advertisement

Popper’s Institutional Turn

  • Rafe Champion
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter is a tribute to two books that were inspired by Karl Popper, The Republic of Science by Ian Jarvie and The Organization of Inquiry by Gordon Tullock. Jarvie’s book attracted little attention, and Tullock’s book has hardly been noticed, and so this is a belated call for their recognition. The chapter contains a summary of the main theme of The Republic of Science and suggests that the social or institutional theme provides a common thread in Popper’s philosophy of science and his approach to politics, a theme which is shared with Hayek’s work on law, legislation, and liberty.

References

  1. Bernal, John D. 1939. The Social Function of Science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Butos, William N., and Thomas J. McQuade. 2006. Government and Science: A Dangerous Liaison? The Independent Review 11 (2): 177–208.Google Scholar
  3. Champion, Rafe A. 1992. Review of the Fatal Conceit. Melbourne Age Monthly Review, November: 17–19.Google Scholar
  4. Collingwood, Robin G. 1957. An Autobiography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Fanelli, Dominic. 2012. Negative Results Are Disappearing from Most Disciplines and Countries. Sociometrics 90 (3): 891–904.Google Scholar
  6. Fang, Ferric, Arturo Casadevall, and Richard P. Morrison 2011. Retracted Science and the Retraction Index. Infectious Immunology 78 (10): 3855–3859. http://iai.asm.org/content/79/10/3855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fuller, Steve. 2000. The Governance of Science. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Greenberg, David S. 2001. Science, Money, and Politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hayek, Friedrich A. 1976. The Constitution of Liberty. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1991. The Fatal Conceit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Heclo, Hugh. 2008. On Thinking Institutionally. London: Paradigm Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Horton, Richard. 2015. Offline: What Is Medicine’s 5 Sigma? The Lancet vol. 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jarvie, Ian C. 2001. The Republic of Science: The Emergence of Popper’s Social View of Science 1935–1945. Amsterdam: Ripodi.Google Scholar
  14. Klein, Daniel B., and Pedro Romero. 2007. Model Building Versus Theorising: The Paucity of Theory. The Journal of Economic Theory 4 (2): 241–271.Google Scholar
  15. Koestler, Arthur. 1967. The Act of Creation. London: Pan.Google Scholar
  16. McCloskey, Diedre N. 2006. The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ———. 2010. Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can’t Explain the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. North, Douglass C. 1993. Economic Performance Through Time. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/1993/north-lecture.html.
  19. Notturno, Mark. 1984. The Popper/Kuhn Debate: Truth and the Two Faces of Relativism. Psychological Medicine 14: 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Polanyi, Michael. 1962. The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory. Minerva 1: 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ———. 1958. Personal Knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Popper, Karl R. 1966. The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 1963a. The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 1963b. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 1972. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  26. Ravetz, Jerold. 1971. Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  27. Shills, Edward. 1972. The Intellectuals and the Powers, and Other Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Tullock, Gordon. 1965. The Organization of Inquiry. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Wettersten, John. 2006. Essay Review of The Republic of Science. Philosophy of Science 73 (1): 108–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rafe Champion
    • 1
  1. 1.Independent ScholarSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations