Advertisement

Hierarchical Ethnic Nationhood in the Formal Membership and Beyond: Joseonjok and Formal and Substantive Citizenship in Their Ethnic Homeland

  • Nora H. Kim
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter broadens the discussion of hierarchical ethnic nationhood in the context of ethnic return migration, from the current narrow focus on the labor market to the often-neglected issue of formal membership in a nation-state. It examines the issue of formal membership from two perspectives: 1) access (or roadblocks) to formal membership, and; 2) the nature of substantive citizenship after securing a formal membership. Analyzing 62 court cases where Joseonjok challenged the denial of their applications, it identifies roadblocks that Joseonjok face in their path to acquiring formal citizenship. Based on a survey data among Joseonjok who have secured formal membership, it evaluates the substantive nature of Joseonjok’s formal membership and demonstrates how hierarchical ethnic nationhood persists even for those who have secured formal membership in Korea.

References

  1. Choi, Hee Jeong, and Nora Hui-Jung Kim. 2017. Of Citizens and Soldiers: Shallow Marketization of Citizenship and Military Service in Neoliberal South Korea. Journal of Cotemporary Asia 47 (4): 515–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Freeman, Caren. 2011. Making and Faking Kinship. Marriage and Labor Migration Between China and South Korea. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Heinemann, Torsten, Ursual Naude, and Anna-Maria Tpanien. 2013. Verifying the Family? A Comparison of DNA Analysis for Family Reunification in Three European Countries (Austria, Finland and Germany). European Journal of Migration and Law 15: 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Joppke, Christian. 2005. Selecting by Origin. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Kim, Jaeun. 2011. Establishing Identity: Documents, Performance, and Biometric Information in Immigration Proceedings. Law and Society 36 (3): 760–786.Google Scholar
  6. Kim, Nora Hui-Jung. 2013. Flexible But Yet Inflexible: Development of Dual Citizenship in South Korea. The Journal of Korean Studies 18 (1): 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kymlicka, Will. 2001. Politics in the Vernacular. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee, Chulwoo. 2012. How Can You Say You’re Korean? Law, Governmentality and National Membership in South Korea. Citizenship Studies 16 (1): 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee, Helene K. 2012. I’m My Mother’s Daughter, I’m My Husband’s Wife, I’m My Child’s Mother, I’m Nothing Else: Resisting Traditional Korean Roles as Korean American Working Women in Seoul, South Korea. Women’s Studies International Forum 36: 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee, Byoungha, Jun Yong Choi, and Jungmin Seo. 2014. Korean-Chinese Workers and the Politics of Korean Nationalism. Pacific Focus 26 (3): 395–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu, Hong. 2014. Beyond Co-ethnicity: The Politics of Differentiating and Integrating New Immigrants in Singapore. Ethnic and Racial Studies 37 (7): 1225–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu, Lisong. 2012. Return Migration and Selective Citizenship: A Study of Returning Chinese Professional Migrants from the United States. Journal of Asian American Studies 15 (1): 35–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ministry of Employment and Labor. 2014. Revised Guideline for Overseas Korean Visit and Employment System. Publication No.: 11-1492000-00268-01 (in Korean).Google Scholar
  14. Ministry of Justice. 2017. Korean Immigration Service. 2016 Annual Immigration Statistics (in Korean).Google Scholar
  15. Ong, Aihwa. 1999. Flexible Citizenship. The Cultural Logistics of Transnationality. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Park, Jung-Sun, and Paul. Y. Chang. 2005. Contention in the Construction of a Global Korean Community: The Case of the Overseas Korean Act. The Journal of Korean Studies 10 (1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Seol, Dong-Hoon, and John D. Skrentny. 2009. Ethnic Return Migration and Hierarchical Nationhood. Korean Chinese Foreign Workers in South Korea. Ethnicities 9 (1): 147–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Seol, Dong-Hoon, and Jungmin Seo. 2014. Dynamics of Ethnic Nationalism and Hierarchical Nationhood: Korean Nation and Its Otherness Since the Late 1980s. Korea Journal 54 (2): 5–33.Google Scholar
  19. Takenaka, Ayumi. 2009. The Rise and Fall of Diasporic Bonds in Japanese-Peruvian ‘Return’ Migration. International Migration 52 (6): 100–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tsuda, Takeyuki. 1999. Transnational Migration and the Nationalization of Ethnic Identity Among Japanese Brazilian Return Migrants. Ethos 27 (2): 145–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ———. 2000. Ethnic Return Migration and the Nation-State: Encouraging the Diaspora to Return ‘Home’. Nations and Nationalism 16 (4): 616–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang, Leslie K. 2016. The Benefits of In-Betweenness: Return Migration of Second-Generation Chinese American Professionals to China. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42 (12): 1941–1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yamashiro, Jane H. 2012. Ethnic Return Migration Policies and Asian American Labor in Japan and Korea. AAPI Nexus 10 (1): 21–39.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nora H. Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Mary WashingtonFredericksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations