Between Utopia and Dystopia: Contemporary Art and Its Conflicting Representations of Scientific Knowledge
This paper investigates how different artistic practices interpret and represent scientific thought in general and genetics in particular. By revising the artworks of three different artists, here we demonstrate that those pertaining to the artistic practices closely associated with the Art, Science and Technology artworld (AST), with its subgenres such as computer or bio art, not only understand science differently than its artistic peers but also represent it in a very particular and positive way. This, we argue, contrasts with the larger artistic field and is the result of this art world particular historical development. We conclude that AST’s popularity, despite struggling to assert itself in the artistic field, reflects a larger popular trend that can be also seen, for example, in the transhumanist movement.
- Anke, S., S. Lindee, E.A. Shanken, et al. 2008. Technogenesis: Aesthetic dimensions of art and biotechnology. In Altering nature, philosophy and medicine, ed. B.A. Lustig, B.A. Brody, and G.P. McKenny, 275–321. Dordrecht: Springer. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4020-6921-5. Accessed 23 July 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Becker, H.S. 2008. Art worlds. 25th Ann. Ed. (1st ed 1982). Berkeley/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 2005. The history of transhumanist thought. Journal of Evolution and Technology 14 (1): 1–25.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. 1993. In The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature, ed. R. Johnson. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Bregenz, Kunsthaus. 2005. Explaining Christians to dinosaurs. Kunsthaus Bregenz. Available from: http://www.kunsthaus-bregenz.at/ehtml/ewelcome00.htm?aus_chapman.htm. Accessed 24 July 2015.
- Chapman, J., and D. Chapman. n.d. Dinos and Jake Chapman. Available from: http://www.jca-online.com/chapman.html. Accessed 23 July 2015.
- Dickey, C. 2001. I love my glow bunny. Wired. Available from: http://archive.wired.com/wired/archive/9.04/bunny.html. Accessed 23 July 2015.
- Goffman, E. 1986. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Northeastern University Press ed. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
- Grunberg, C. 2007. Attraction–repulsion machines: The art of Jake and Dinos Chapman. In Jake and Dinos Chapman: Bad art for bad people, First ed, ed. C. Grunberg, T. Barson, and C. Wallis, et al., 11–29. New York: Tate Publishing. Available from: http://www.serpentinegalleries.org/sites/default/files/press-releases/Press%20Pack%20Final%202013-11-27.pdf.
- ———. 2013. Human nature from a transhumanist perspective. Existenz 8 (2): 64–69.Google Scholar
- ———. 2014a. Better humans?: Understanding the enhancement project. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- ———. 2014b. Utopia in trans- and posthumanism. In Post- and transhumanism: An introduction, Beyond humanism: Trans- and posthumanism, First ed, ed. R. Ranisch and S.L. Sorgner, 101–108. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Available from: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/232771099_Utopia_in_Trans-and_Posthumanism. Accessed 23 July 2015.
- Kac, E. 1998. Transgenic art. Leonardo Electronic Almanac 6(11). Available from: http://ekac.org/transgenic.html. Accessed 24 July 2015.
- ———. 2000. GFP bunny. Available from: http://www.ekac.org/gfpbunny.html. Accessed 27 Aug 2015.
- ———. 2007a. Art that looks you in the eye: Hybrids, clones, mutants, synthetics, and transgenics. In Signs of life: Bio art and beyond., Leonardo, ed. E. Kac, 1–28. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 2007b. Life transformation – art mutation. In Signs of life: Bio art and beyond., Leonardo, ed. E. Kac, 163–184. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- ———., ed. 2007c. Signs of life: Bio art and beyond. Leonardo. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 2007b. Computergrafik: Ästhetische Experimente zwischen zwei Kulturen. Die Anfänge der Computerkunst in den 1960er Jahren, 2007th ed. Wien: Springer.Google Scholar
- Kurzweil, R. 1999. The age of spiritual machines: When computers exceed human intelligence. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
- Miah, A. 2009. A critical history of posthumanism. In Medical enhancement and posthumanity, ed. B. Gordijn and R.F. Chadwick, 71–94. Dordrecht: Springer. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8852-0. Accessed 24 July 2015.
- Nunez, G. A. 2016. Between technophilia, cold war and rationality: A social and cultural history of digital art. PhD, London: University of the Arts London.Google Scholar
- Ranisch, R. 2014. Morality of transhumanism and posthumanism. In Post- and transhumanism: An introduction, beyond humanism: Trans- and posthumanism, First ed, ed. R. Ranisch and S.L. Sorgner, 149–172. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Roszak, T. 1969. The making of a counter culture; reflections on the technocratic society and its youthful opposition. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
- Salah, A.A.A. 2008. Discontents of computer Art: A discourse analysis on the intersection of arts, sciences and technology. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
- Shanken, E.A. 2016. Contemporary art and new media: Digital divide or hybrid discourse? In A companion to digital art, ed. C. Paul, 463–481. Wiley Blackwell: Malden.Google Scholar
- Stallabrass, J. 2006. High art lite: The rise and fall of young British art. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- TATE Liverpool. 2006. Jake and Dinos Chapman: Bad art for bad people. TATE. Available from: http://www.tate.org.uk/node/236985/guide/default.shtm. Accessed 24 July 2015.
- Taylor, G.D. 2014. When the machine made art: The troubled history of computer art. New York: Bloomsbury Academic. Available from: http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=1650669. Accessed 25 Apr 2015.Google Scholar