Advertisement

Public Mexican Corporations’ Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Profit Benefits of Protected Natural Areas Programs for Socially Responsible Investors

  • Irma Cristina Espitia-Moreno
  • Oscar Valdemar De la Torre-Torres
  • Dolores Guadalupe Martínez-Peña
Chapter

Abstract

In the present chapter, we conduct an event-driven test of the implementation of a Natural Protected Area Program (NPAP) and the status of being socially responsible either in the profits or in the stock price of public corporations traded in the Mexican Stock Exchange. By using a panel regression model with yearly data from 2014 to 2016 of 33 companies, we found that even though the socially responsible status and the benefits of implementing a NPAP in a company are not priced by investors, the adoption of a NPAP creates, on average, an extra 13.38% ROI. Following our results, we suggest the level of NPAP implementation in a country as a potential sustainability (environmental) indicator be measured in panel regressions in different countries and to use such indicator as a portfolio asset allocation factor.

Keywords

Socially responsible investment Asset allocation Natural protected areas Environmental factors Portfolio multifactor models Panel data regression 

References

  1. Bauer R, Koedijk K, Otten R (2005) International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style. J Bank Financ 29(7):1751–1767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Capelle-Blancard G, Couderc N (2009) The impact of socially responsible investing: evidence from stock index redefinitions. J Invest 18(2):76–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carhart M (1997) On persistence in mutual fund performance. J Financ LII(1):57–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Consolandi C, Jaiswal-Dale A, Poggiani E, Vercelli A (2008) Global standards and ethical stock indexes: the case of the Dow Jones sustainability Stoxx index. J Bus Ethics 87(S1):185–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De la Torre O, Martínez M (2016) Is socially responsible investment useful in Mexico? A multi-factor and ex-ante review. Contaduría Y Administración 62(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cya.2016.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De la Torre O, Galeana E, Aguilasocho D (2016) The use of the sustainable investment against the broad market one. A first test in the Mexican stock market. Eur Res Manag Bus Econ 22(3):117–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedee.2015.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Derwall J, Koedijk K, Ter Horst J (2011) A tale of values-driven and profit-seeking social investors. J Bank Financ 35(8):2137–2147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fama E, French K (1992) Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J Financ Econ 33(1):3–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huberman G, Kandel S (1987) Mean-variance spanning. J Financ 42(4):873–888. https://doi.org/10.2307/2328296 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Martí-Ballester C (2015) Can socially responsible investment for cleaner production improve the financial performance of Spanish pension plans? J Clean Prod 106(April 2013):466–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Moskowitz M (1972) Choosing socially responsible stocks. Bus Soc Rev (08934398). Retrieved from http://ezproxy.mytyndale.ca:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=6453516&site=ehost-live&scope=site
  12. Renneboog L, Ter Horst J, Zhang C (2008) Socially responsible investments: institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. J Bank Financ 32(9):1723–1742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schröder M (2004) The performance of socially responsible investments: investment funds and indices. Fin Mkts Portfolio Mgmt 18(2):122–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-004-0202-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schröder M (2007) Is there a difference? The performance characteristics of SRI equity indices. J Bus Finance Account 34(1–2):331–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00647.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sharpe W (1963) A simplified model for portfolio analysis. Manag Sci 9(2):277–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sharpe W (1964) Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J Finance, XIX 3:425–442Google Scholar
  17. Statman M (2000) Socially responsible mutual funds. Financ Anal J 56(3):30–39. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2016.42.2.140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Valencia H (2015) Decomposition of the stocks returns in the sustainable index of the Mexican stock exchange decomposition of the stocks returns in the sustainable index of the Mexican stock exchange. Rev Mex Econ Y Finanzas 10(1):85–99 Retrieved from http://www.remef.org.mx/c/documentos/anteriores/#link_125 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irma Cristina Espitia-Moreno
    • 1
  • Oscar Valdemar De la Torre-Torres
    • 1
  • Dolores Guadalupe Martínez-Peña
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Accounting and Administrative SciencesSaint Nicholas for Hidalgo’s Michoacan State UniversityMoreliaMexico

Personalised recommendations