Advertisement

Realities and Pending Issues in the Scientific Research in Natural Protected Areas in Mexico

  • Manuel Jesús Pinkus-RendónEmail author
  • Cielo María Ávila-López
  • Michael V. Córdoba-Matson
  • Alfredo Ortega-Rubio
Chapter

Abstract

In order to offer useful recommendations for sustainable management of natural protected area(s) (NPA) in Mexico, scientific research should address not only ecological but also economic and social aspects as well. For most part, all NPA or to be designated NPA in Mexico have some anthropogenic interaction or a human settlement, and the majority live in poverty. Management of NPA should include poverty relief and livelihood alternatives developed specifically for the local populations. This work emphasizes the aspects of scientific research in Mexican NPA that need to be developed. It stresses the need for multidisciplinary and multi-institutional scientific research related to sustainable use of natural resources and updates information related to NPA integration. To obtain a sustainable bio-cultural heritage, the information provided supports CONANP efforts to integrate its sustainability model of nature with human capital to improve performance of NPA. To this end, scientific research in NPA is indispensable, for it is the only “in vivo laboratory model” available to test public sustainability policies not only for the protected area but also for the survival of the planet. This is the ultimate goal of the National Network of Protected Natural Areas (RENANP-CONACYT).

Keywords

Natural protected areas Scientific research Bio-cultural heritage Public policies 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was part of the activities developed with the economic support of the Red Temática de Investigación of CONACYT Project 293368 and the CONACYT Basic Science Project 251919.

References

  1. Badillo Jimenez ML, Rhodes Cruz S, Aburto Lozano MÁ, Rodriguez Quiroz G (2014) Environmental and socioeconomic problems of Veracruz Reef System National Park. Res Sci Auton Univ Aguascalientes 22(60):58–64Google Scholar
  2. Barrasa García S (2012) Knowledge and traditional uses of wildlife in two farming communities in the biosphere reserve of Encrucijada, Chiapas. Ethnobiology 10(1):16–28 Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/5294488.pdf Google Scholar
  3. Bezaury-Creel J, Gutierrez-Carbonell D (2009) Biodiversity conservation in Mexico. Natural capital of Mexico Vol II: conservation status and trends of changeGoogle Scholar
  4. Brundtland GH (1987) Report of the world commission on environment and development (Brundtland commission): our common future. Brundtland Commission, New York, New York Retrieved from http://www.un.org/es/comun/docs/?symbol=A/42/427 Google Scholar
  5. Chamber of Deputies of the Mexican Congress (2014) Regulation of the general law of ecological balance and environmental protection in natural protected areas. Retrieved from http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/regley/Reg_LGEEPA_ANP.pdf
  6. Chamber of Deputies of the Mexican Congress (2016) General law of ecological balance and environmental protection, Official Gazette 128, Mexico. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  7. De la Rosa Velazquez MI, Espinoza Tenorio A, Diaz-Perera MÁ, Ortega-Argueta A, Ramos-Reyes R, Espejel I (2017) Development stressors are stronger than protected area management: a case of the Pantanos de Centla biosphere reserve, Mexico. Land Use Policy 67:340–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.06.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Desmet E (2014) Conservation and indigenous peoples: a legal partner analysis. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.mx/books?hl=es&lr=&id=kG-JAwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA9&dq=ANP+economía+ecológica+intereses+y+necesidades+de+las+poblaciones&ots=NKXG99Q4jr&sig= C15CHOgPRFmTsmHq9iKQ40L9b1I & redir_esc = y # v = onepage & q & f = false Google Scholar
  9. Dudley N (2008) Guidelines for the implementation of management categories of protected areas. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN), Gland. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2008.PAPS.2.es CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Federal Executive Branch (2007) Agreement establishing nine regional offices of the National Commission of Natural Protected Areas are established. National Commission of Natural Protected Areas (CONANP), Mexico Retrieved from http://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=4994153&fecha=20/07/2007 Google Scholar
  11. González Ocampo HA, Bald Cortes P, Iñiguez Dávalos LI, Ortega Rubio A (2014) Protected natural areas of Mexico. Res Sci 60:7–15Google Scholar
  12. Guevara S, Halffter G (2007) Strategy for conservation of biodiversity in protected areas of international designation: the synthesis. Toward a culture of conservation .... Retrieved from http://www.sea-entomologia.org/PDF/PDFSM3MVOL6/Pdf100901801GuevaraHalffter.pdf
  13. Halffter G (2011) Biosphere reserves: problems and opportunities in Mexico. Acta Zool Mex 27(1):177–189 Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/azm/v27n1/v27n1a14.pdf Google Scholar
  14. Labandeira X, Leo CJ, Vázquez MX (2007) Environmental economics. Pearson, Madrid Retrieved from http://www.banrepcultural.org/blaavirtual/ayudadetareas/economia/econo62.htm Google Scholar
  15. Lopoukhine N, Crawhall N, Dudley N, Figgis P, Karibuhoye C, Laffoley D, Miranda-Londono J, Mackinnon K, Sandwith T (2012) Protected areas: natural solutions to providing 21st century challenges. SAPIENS 5(2):117–131. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Martínez Alier JJ, Jordi Roca J (2013) Green economy and environmental policy, 3rd edn. Fondo de Cultura Economica SL of Spain, Mexico CityGoogle Scholar
  17. Martinez-Alier J, Kallis G, Veuthey S, Walter M, Temper L (2010) Social metabolism, ecological distribution conflicts, and languages valuation. Ecol Econ 70(2):153–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mendez Escobar FE (2003) The Johannesburg summit and the participation of Mexico: 30 years of multilateral efforts to move towards sustainable development. Mex Foreign Policy Mag:73–100 Retrieved from https://revistadigital.sre.gob.mx/images/stories/numeros/n67-68/urquidi.pdf
  19. Millenniunm Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Millennium ecosystem assessment synthesis report. Retrieved from http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.439.aspx.pdf
  20. Montes-Sosa M, Durán-Ferman P, Hernandez-Garcia MÁ (2012) Social and environmental relationships between communities and protected areas. Calakmul biosphere reserve: between conflict and conservation. Mag Chapingo Serie For Environ XVIII(1):111–121. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2010.10.097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Naciona Network of Protected Natural Areas (RENANP) (2018) Goals. Retrieved from http://areas-naturales-protegidas.org/renanp/e_objetivos.php
  22. National Commission of Natural Protected Areas (CONANP) (2016th) Protected natural areas. Retrieved from http://www.conanp.gob.mx/regionales/
  23. National Commission of Natural Protected Areas (CONANP) (2016b) Cartographic series. Retrieved from http://sig.conanp.gob.mx/website/pagsig/anp/nal/mapasprevios/mapa_anps_vegetacion_PREVIO.htm
  24. National Commission of Natural Protected Areas (CONANP) (2017a) Cartographic series. Retrieved from http://sig.conanp.gob.mx/website/pagsig/anp/nal/mapasprevios/mapa_actualizado_anps_PREVIO.htm
  25. National Commission of Natural Protected Areas (CONANP) (2017b) Protected areas Nturales enacted. Retrieved from http://sig.conanp.gob.mx/website/pagsig/anps_decretadas/lista_anps.pdf
  26. National Commission of Natural Protected Areas (CONANP) (2018) Statistics. Retrieved from http://sig.conanp.gob.mx/website/pagsig/datos_anp.htm
  27. Olmos Martinez E, Pool S, Morales Beltran LF, Breceda Solis A, Ortega A, Ortega Rubio A (2008) Ecological wealth and economic poverty in a protected natural area Baja California Sur. Reg Soc XX(42):133–164Google Scholar
  28. Pinkus Rendón MJ (2010) Between the forest and the river. International and public policy plans in Tabasco. Usumacinta Canyon globalization. UADY-P & V, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  29. Pinkus Rendón MJ, Pinkus Rendon MA, Ortega-Rubio A (2014) Recommendations for sustainable management in protected natural areas of Mexico. Res Sci 22(60):102–110 Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=67431160013 Google Scholar
  30. Riemann H, Alvarez S, Rivardo V, Pombo A (2011) The role of protected natural areas in local development. The case of the Baja California peninsula. Manag Public Policy 1(664):141–172 Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-10792011000100004 Google Scholar
  31. Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources (SEMARNAT) (2017) Biodiversity. Retrieved from http://dgeiawf.semarnat.gob.mx:8080/ibi_apps/WFServlet?IBIF_ex=D3_BIODIV04_17&IBIC_user=dgeia_mce&IBIC_pass=dgeia_mce&NOMBREANIO=*
  32. Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources (SEMARNAT) and the National Commission of Natural Protected Areas (CONANP) (2016) Statistical and geographical handbook of Natural Protected Areas of Mexico, 103Google Scholar
  33. Tetreault DV (2008) Schools ecological thinking in the social sciences. Mag Soc Stud 16(32):9–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Toledo VM (2015) Ecocide in Mexico: the final battle is for life. Grijalbo, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  35. United Nations Organization (UN) (1973) Report of the United Nations conference on the human environment. United Nations, Stockholm Retrieved from http://www.dipublico.org/conferencias/mediohumano/A-CONF.48-14-REV.1.pdf Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manuel Jesús Pinkus-Rendón
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cielo María Ávila-López
    • 1
  • Michael V. Córdoba-Matson
    • 2
  • Alfredo Ortega-Rubio
    • 2
  1. 1.Unidad de Ciencias Sociales, Centro de Investigaciones Regionales “Dr. Hideyo Noguchi”Universidad Autónoma de YucatanMéridaMexico
  2. 2.Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del NoroesteLa PazMexico

Personalised recommendations