Army Men: Military Masculinity in Call of Duty

  • Gregory Blackburn
Part of the Palgrave Games in Context book series (PAGCON)


Military-themed video games allow civilians to play war, not just as a soldier, but in a particularly constructed, heavily gendered soldier identity, situated in our cultural understanding of militarized masculinity. Call of Duty, the top-selling video game franchise in North America for the previous seven consecutive years, is an exemplar of the military games genre, a significant potential source for representations of masculinity, and a suitable entry point for exploring military masculinity in video games. In this analysis, I examine how militarized masculinity is constructed within the single-player campaigns of Call of Duty, how this construction reinforces the default conflation between military and masculine ideals, and how traditionally entrenched aspects of masculinity are in turn reinforced and challenged throughout the series.


Masculinity Militarism First-person shooter Militainment 


  1. Arkin, William, and Lynne R. Dobrofsky. 1978. Military Socialization and Masculinity. Journal of Social Issues 34 (1): 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashe, Fidelma. 2013. Gendering War and Peace: Militarized Masculinities in Northern Ireland. Men and Masculinities 15 (3): 230–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett, Frank J. 1996. The Organizational Construction of Hegemonic Masculinity: The Case of the US Navy. Gender, Work, and Organization 3 (3): 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basham, Victoria M. 2016. Gender and Militaries: The Importance of Military Masculinities for the Conduct of State Sanctioned Violence. In Handbook on Gender and War, ed. Simona Sharoni, Julia Welland, Linda Steiner, and Jennifer Pederson, 29–41. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Belkin, Aaron, Morten G. Ender, Nathaniel Frank, Stacie R. Furia, George Lucas, Gary Packard, Steven M. Samuels, Tammy Schultz, and David R. Segal. 2013. Readiness and DADT Repeal Has the New Policy of Open Service Undermined the Military? Armed Forces & Society 39: 587–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braidotti, Rosi. 2011. Nomadic Theory: The Portable Rosi Braidotti. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Breuer, Johannes, Ruth Festl, and Thorsten Quandt. 2011. In the Army Now—Narrative Elements and Realism in Military First-Person Shooters. Proceedings of DiGRA 2011 Conference: Think Design Play.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, Melissa Tracey. 2007. Enlisting Masculinity: Gender and the Recruitment of the All-Volunteer Force. Ph.D. Diss., Rutgers.Google Scholar
  9. Bulmer, Sarah. 2013. Patriarchal Confusion? Making Sense of Gay and Lesbian Military Identity. International Feminist Journal of Politics 15: 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cassar, Robert. 2013. Gramsci and Games. Games and Culture 8 (5): 330–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chalabi, Mona. 2015. What Percentage Of Americans Have Served In The Military? FiveThirtyEight, March 19. Accessed 1 Apr 2016.
  12. Chamberlin, Eagan, and M. Sheena. 2012. Emasculated by Trauma: A Social History of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Stigma, and Masculinity. The Journal of American Culture 35 (4): 358–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cockburn, Cynthia. 1985. Machinery of Dominance: Women, Men and Technical Know-How. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2010. Gender Relations as Causal in Militarization and War. International Feminist Journal of Politics 12: 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Connell, R.W. 2005. Masculinities. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Connell, R.W., and James W. Messerschmidt. 2005. Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept. Gender & Society 19 (6): 829–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Der Derian, J. 2001. Virtuous War: Mapping the Military-Industrial-Entertainment Network. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  18. Duncanson, Claire. 2015. Hegemonic Masculinity and the Possibility of Change in Gender Relations. Men and Masculinities 18 (2): 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eriksson Baaz, Maria, and Maria Stern. 2009. Why Do Soldiers Rape? Masculinity, Violence and Sexuality in the Armed Forces in the Congo. International Studies Quarterly 53: 495–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fahey, Mike. 2014. Nothing Says Funeral Like a Quick Time Event. Kotaku, November 3. Accessed 1 Apr 2016.
  21. Furia, Stacie R., and Denise D. Bielby. 2009. Bombshells on Film: Women, Military Films, and Hegemonic Gender Ideologies. Popular Communication 7: 208–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gagnon, Frédérick. 2010. “Invading Your Hearts and Minds”: Call of Duty and the (Re)Writing of Militarism in U.S. Digital Games and Popular Culture. European Journal of American Studies 2: 2–17.Google Scholar
  23. Galloway, Alexander R. 2006. Gaming: Essays on Algorithmic Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  24. Garcia, Hector A., Erin P. Finley, William Lorber, and Matthew Jakupcak. 2011. A Preliminary Study of the Association Between Traditional Masculine Behavioral Norms and PTSD Symptoms in Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans. Psychology of Men & Masculinity 12 (1): 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hale, Hannah C. 2012. The Role of Practice in the Development of Military Masculinities. Gender, Work and Organization 19 (6): 699–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Halter, Ed. 2006. From Sun Tsu to Xbox: War and Video Games. New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press.Google Scholar
  27. Haraway, Donna. 2006. A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late 20th Century. In The International Handbook of Virtual Learning Environments, ed. Joel Weiss, Jason Nolan, Jeremy Hunsinger, and Peter Trifonas, 117–158. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hayles, N. Katherine. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Higate, Paul R. 2003. ‘Soft Clerks’ and ‘Hard Civvies’: Pluralizing Military Masculinities. In Military Masculinities, ed. Paul R. Higate, 27–42. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  30. Higate, Paul. 2007. Peacekeepers, Masculinities, and Sexual Exploitation. Men and Masculinities 10 (1): 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hitchens, Michael, Bronwin Patrickson, and Sherman Young. 2014. Reality and Terror, the First-Person Shooter in Current Day Settings. Games and Culture 9 (1): 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hockey, John. 2003. No More Heroes: Masculinity in the Infantry. In Military Masculinities, ed. Paul R. Higate, 15–25. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  33. Höglund, Johan. 2008. Electronic Empire: Orientalism Revisited in the First Person Shooter. Game Studies 8 (1). Accessed 10 Nov 2011.
  34. ———. 2014. Magic Nodes and Proleptic Warfare in the Multiplayer Component of Battlefield 3. Game Studies 14 (1). Accessed 1 Nov 2016.
  35. Hopton, John. 2003. The State and Military Masculinity. In Military Masculinities, ed. Paul R. Higate, 111–123. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  36. Huntemann, Nina B., and Matthew Thomas Payne. 2010. In Introduction to Joystick Soldiers. The Politics of Play in Military Video Games, ed. Nina B. Huntemann and Matthew Thomas Payne, 1–18. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Hutchings, Kimberly. 2008. Making Sense of Masculinity and War. Men and Masculinities 10 (4): 389–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Johnson, David, and Bronson Stamp. 2015. See Women’s Progress in the U.S. Military. Time Labs. Accessed 1 Nov 2016.
  39. Khalili, Laleh. 2011. Gendered Practices of Counterinsurgency. Review of International Studies 37: 1471–1491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. King, C. Richard, and David J. Leonard. 2010. Wargames as a New Frontier: Securing American Empire in Virtual Space. In Joystick Soldiers. The Politics of Play in Military Video Games, ed. Nina B. Huntemann and Matthew Thomas Payne, 91–105. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Knight, Shawn. 2016. ‘Call of Duty: Black Ops III’ was the Best-Selling Game of 2015. Techspot, January 15. Accessed 1 Apr 2016.
  42. Kovitz, Marcia. 2003. The Roots of Military Masculinity. In Military Masculinities, ed. Paul R. Higate, 1–14. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  43. Krobova, Tereza, Ondrej Moravec, and Jaroslav Svelch. 2015. Dressing Commander Shepard in Pink: Queer Playing in a Heteronormative Game Culture. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 9 (3). Accessed 1 Nov 2016.
  44. Kronsell, Annica. 2016. Sexed Bodies and Military Masculinities: Gender Path Dependence in EU’s Common Security and Defense Policy. Men and Masculinities 19 (3): 311–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Leonard, David. 2004. Unsettling the Military Entertainment Complex: Video Games and a Pedagogy of Peace. Studies in Media & Information Literacy Education 4 (4): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Makuch, Eddie. 2015. Call of Duty Gets First Playable Female Lead With Black Ops 3. Gamespot, April 27. Accessed 1 Nov 2016.
  47. Mirrless, Tanner. 2009. Digital Militainment by Design: Producing and Playing SOCOM: U.S. Navy SEALs. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics 5 (3): 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Morgan, David H.J. 1994. Theater of War: Combat, the Military, and Masculinities. In Theorizing Masculinities, ed. Harry Brod and Michael Kaufman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Morse, Margaret. 1997. Virtually Female: Body and Code. In Processed Lives: Gender and Technology in Everyday Life, ed. Jennifer Terry and Melodie Calvert, 23–36. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Nichols, Randy. 2010. Target Acquired: America’s Army and the Video Game Industry. In Joystick Soldiers. The Politics of Play in Military Video Games, ed. Nina B. Huntemann and Matthew Thomas Payne, 39–52. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Nieborg, David B. 2010. Training Recruits and Conditioning Youth: The Soft Power of Military Games. In Joystick Soldiers: The Political Play in Military Video Games, ed. Nina B. Huntemann and Matthew Thomas Payne, 53–66. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Niva, Steve. 1998. Tough and Tender: New World Order, Masculinity and the Gulf War. In The ‘Man Question’ in International Relations, ed. Marysia Zalewski and Jane Parpart, 109–128. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  53. Payne, Matthew Thomas. 2010. F*ck You, Noob Tube!: Learning the Art of Ludic LAN War. In Joystick Soldiers. The Politics of Play in Military Video Games, ed. Nina B. Huntemann and Matthew Thomas Payne, 206–222. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Pleck, Joseph H. 1981. The Myth of Masculinity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  55. Power, Marcus. 2007. Digitized Virtuosity: Video War Games and Post-9/11 Cyber-Deterrence. Security Dialogue 38 (2): 271–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Riendeau, Danielle. 2014. Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare Does Right by Women Warriors. Polygon, November 26. Accessed 1 Nov 2016.
  57. Rosenberg, Mathew, and Dave Phillips. 2015. Pentagon Opens All Combat Roles to Women: ‘No Exceptions.’ New York Times, December 4, sec A.Google Scholar
  58. Shaw, Adrienne. 2009. Putting the Gay in Games: Cultural Production and GLBT Content in Video Games. Games and Culture 4 (3): 228–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smicker, Josh. 2010. Future Combat, Combating Futures. Temporalities of War Video Games and the Performance of Proleptic Histories. In Joystick Soldiers. The Politics of Play in Military Video Games, ed. Nina B. Huntemann and Matthew Thomas Payne, 106–121. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Stahl, Roger. 2010. Militainment, Inc: War, Media, and Popular Culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Tasker, Yvonne. 2002. Soldiers’ Stories: Women and Military Masculinities in Courage Under Fire. Quarterly Review of Film & Video 19: 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Whitworth, Sandra. 2004. Men, Militarism and UN Peacekeeping: A Gendered Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  63. Woodward, Rachel. 1998. ‘It’s a Man’s Life’: Soldiers, Masculinity, and the Countryside. Gender, Place, and Culture 5 (3): 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory Blackburn
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MassachusettsAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations