Advertisement

Does Innovation Trigger the Internationalisation of Clusters?: The Case of Polish Boiler-Making Cluster

  • Barbara Jankowska
  • Marta Götz
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

The goal of the paper is first to synthesise the knowledge on clusters’ role in internationalisation processes and second to refer to innovation as a mediating variable in the internationalisation of clusters’ firms. We outline diverse channels of how clusters can foster foreign expansion, distinguishing the following types of internationalisation: passive inward-looking and active outward-looking, with direct top-down and indirect bottom-up support for the cluster as such and its members. The proposed classification may enrich the current research in this area and facilitate future studies, serving as some navigation tool and typology instrument. The case of Polish successful boiler-making cluster illustrates the consideration presented in this article. Particularly, it highlights the role of top-down, more formal activities stimulating innovation which is one of the cluster channels for promoting internationalisation.

Keywords

Cluster Innovation Internationalisation Small and medium enterprise (SME) Poland 

References

  1. Aharoni, Y. (1993). In search for the unique: Can firm-specific advantages be evaluated? Journal of Management Studies, 30(1), 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akman, G., & Yilmaz, C. (2008). Innovative capability, innovation strategy and market orientation: An empirical analysis in turkish software industry. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12(1), 69–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alegre, J., Pla-Barber, J., Chiva, R., & Villar, C. (2012). Organizational learning capability, product innovation performance and export intensity. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(5), 511–526.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.674672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, S. O., & Egger, P. H. (2007). Endogenous product versus process innovation and a firm’s propensity to export. Empirical Economics, 44(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
  5. Belderbos, R., Lykogianni, E. & Veugelers, R. (2004). Strategic R&D location by multinational firms: Spillovers, technology sourcing and competition, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 2 December 2004.Google Scholar
  6. Blomqvist, K., & Levy, J. (2006). Collaboration capability – A focal concept in knowledge creation and collaborative innovation in networks. https://impgroup.org/uploads/papers/4503.pdf
  7. Blomstermo, A., Eriksson, K., Lindstrand, A., & Sharma, D. D. (2004). The perceived usefulness of network experiential knowledge in the internationalizing firm. Journal of International Management, 10(3), 355–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brüderl, J., & Schüssler, R. (1990). Organizational mortality: The liabilities of newness and adolescence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 530–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Camisón, C., & Villar-López, A. (2012). Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2891–2902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cassiman, B., & Golovko, E. (2011). Innovation and internationalization through exports. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(1), 56–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cassiman, B., & Martinez-Ros, E. (2007). Product innovation and exports: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing. IESE Working Paper. http://www.eco.uc3m.es/temp/agenda/Cassiman.pdf
  12. Cerrato, D. (1999). Does innovation lead to global orientation? Empirical evidence from a sample of Italian firms. European Management Journal, 27(5), 305–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chetty, S., & Campbell-Hunt, C. (2003). Paths to internationalisation among small- to medium-sized firms: A global versus regional approach. European Journal of Marketing, 37(5/6), 796–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chetty, S. K., & Stangl, L. M. (2009). Internationalization and innovation in a network relationship context. European Journal of Marketing, 44(11/12), 1725–1743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. CSO. (2016). Statistical yearbook of the republic of Poland. Warsaw.Google Scholar
  17. D’Angelo, A. (2010). Innovation and export performance: A study of Italian high-tech SMEs. Journal of Management and Governance, 16(3), 39–58.Google Scholar
  18. Damijan, J. P., & Kostevc, Č. (2010). Learning from trade through innovation: Causal Link between imports, exports and innovation in Spanish microdata. LICOS Discussion Paper, No. 264/2010 (August), available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1658389 or http://dx.doi.org/1658310.1652139/ssrn.1658389
  19. Damijan, J. P., Kostevc, Ä., & Polanec, S. (2010). From innovation to exporting or vice versa? The World Economy, 33(3), 374–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dyer, W. G., & Wilkins, A. L. (1991). Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: A rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 613–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Enkel, E., Grossman, O., & Chesbrough, H. (2009). Open R&D and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management, 39(4), 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ford, D. & Johnsen, T. (2001). Managing networks of supplier and customer relationships for technological innovation: Initial case study findings. Proceedings from the 17th IMP Conference, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
  23. Freeman, J., Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1983). The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. American Sociological Review, 48(5), 692–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Galbraith, C. S., Rodriguez, C. L., & Stiles, C. H. (2007). Social capital as a club good: The case of ethnic communities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 1(1), 38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Geroski, P. (1991). Market dynamics and entry. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Giovannetti, G., Ricchiuti, G., & Velucchi, M. (2009). Size, innovation and internationalization: A survival analysis of Italian firms. Applied Economics, 43(12), 1511–1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. GUS. (2014). Rocznik Statystyczny Województw 2013 (Statistical Yearbook of Regions 2013). Warszawa: GUS.Google Scholar
  29. GUS. (2015). Rocznik Statystyczny Województw 2014 (Statistical Yearbook of Regions 2015). Warszawa: GUS.Google Scholar
  30. GUS. (2016). Rocznik Statystyczny Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej. Warszawa.Google Scholar
  31. Halilem, N., Bertrand, C., Cloutier, J. S., Réjean, L., & Nabil, A. (2012). The knowledge value chain as an SME innovation policy framework: An analytical exploration of SME innovation policies in OECD countries. International Journal of Technology Management, 58(3/4), 236–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Haller, S. A. (2012). Intra-firm trade, exporting, importing, and firm performance. Canadian Journal of Economics, 45(4), 1397–1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hashmi, A. R. (2013). Competition and innovation: The inverted-U relationship revisited. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(5), 1653–1668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hessels, S. J. A. (2007). Innovation and international involvement of Dutch SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 4(3), 234–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Holmlund, M., Kock, S., & Vanyushyn, V. (2007). Small and medium-sized enterprises’ internationalization and the influence of importing on exporting. International Small Business Journal, 25(5), 459–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Islankina, E. (2015). Internationalization of regional clusters: theoretical and empirical issues. Basic research program, Working Papers Series: Science, technology and innovation, WP BRP 41/STI/2015.Google Scholar
  37. Jankowska, B. (2013). Czym jest umiędzynarodowienie klastra? (Cluster internationalisation – what is it?). In R. Kamiński (Ed.), 2013. Siła współdziałania - formy, mechanizmy i skutki umiędzynarodowienia klastrów (pp. 9–27). Poznań: Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne Oddział w Poznaniu.Google Scholar
  38. Jankowska, B., & Götz, M. (2016). Internationalisation intensity of business clusters and their impact on firm internationalisation – the case of clusters from Poland. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Conference of the European International Business Academy (EIBA) - Liabilities of Foreignness vs the Value of Diversity, 02 May 2016, Vienna.Google Scholar
  39. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 1411–1431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jones, G., & Khanna, T. (2006). Bringing history (back) into international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(4), 453–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kaufmann, A., & Tödtling, F. (2001). Science-industry interaction in the process of innovation: The importance of boundary-crossing between systems. Research Policy, 30(5), 791–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Knight, G. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities and the global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 124–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Korhonen, H., Luostarinen, R., & Welch, L. (1996). Internationalization of SMEs: Inward-outward patterns and government policy. MIR: Management International Review, 36(4), 15–329.Google Scholar
  44. Lam, W. L., & White, P. L. (1999). An adaptive choice model of the internationalisation process. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 7(2), 105–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. The Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lundvall, B.-Å., Johnson, B., Anderson, E. S., & Dalum, B. (2002). National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research Policy, 31(2), 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Martínez-Fernández, M. T., Capó-Vicedo, J., & Vallet-Bellmunt, T. (2012). The present state of research into industrial clusters and districts - Content analysis of material published in 1997–2006. European Planning Studies, 20(2), 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miles, I. (2006). Innovation in services. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 433–458). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Monreal-Pérez, J., Aragón-Sánchez, A., & Sánchez-Marín, G. (2012). A longitudinal study of the relationship between export activity and innovation in the Spanish firm: The moderating role of productivity. International Business Review, 21(5), 862–877.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.09.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nassimbeni, G. (2001). Technology, innovation capacity, and the export attitude of small manufacturing firms: A logit/tobit model. Research Policy, 30(2), 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nauwelaerts, Y., & Vijfeyken, E. (2013). The effect of export promotion programs on export satisfaction: A study in the Flemish design sector. In F. De Beule & Y. Nauwelaerts (Eds.), Innovation and creativity: Pillars of the future global economy (pp. 126–154). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Oke, A., Burke, G., & Myers, A. (2007). Innovation types and performance in growing UK SMEs. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(7), 735–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Onetti, A., Zucchella, A., Jones, M. V., & McDougall-Covin, P. P. (2010). Internationalization, innovation and entrepreneurship: Business models for new technology-based firms. Journal of Management and Governance, 16(3), 337–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. PARP. (2012). Benchmarking klastrów w Polsce – edycja 2012, ed. PARP, Warszawa: Hołub-Iwan J.Google Scholar
  55. PARP. (2014). Benchmarking klastrów w Polsce – edycja 2014, ed. PARP, Warszawa: Plawgo B.Google Scholar
  56. Pla-Barber, J., & Alegre, J. (2007). Analyzing the link between export intensity, innovation and firm size in a science-based industry. International Business Review, 16(3), 275–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Roper, S., Du, J., & Love, J. H. (2008). Modelling the innovation value chain. Research Policy, 37(6), 961–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ruzzier, M., Hisrich, R. D., & Antoncic, B. (2006). SME internationalization research: Past, present, and future. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 13(4), 476–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sobrero, M., & Roberts, E. (2002). Strategic management of supplier-manufacturer relations in new product development. Research Policy, 31(1), 159–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stoian, M.-C., Rialp, A., & Rialp, J. (2011). Export performance under the microscope: A glance through Spanish lenses. International Business Review, 20(2), 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Van Beveren, I., & Vandenbussche, H. (2010). Product and process innovation and firms’ decision to export. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 13(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Veugelers, R., & Cassiman, B. (2005). R&D cooperation between firms and universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23(5-6), 355–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G. (2003). Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for the organization science. Organization Science, 14(2), 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wakelin, K. (1998). Innovation and export behavior at the firm level. Research Policy, 26(7-8), 829–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Welch, L. S., & Luostarinen, R. (1988). Internationalization. Evolution of a concept. Journal of General Management, 14(2), 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wright, M., Westhead, P., & Ucbasaran, D. (2007). Internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and international entrepreneurship: A critique and policy implications. Regional Studies, 41(7), 1013–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  68. Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341–363.Google Scholar
  69. Zaheer, S. (2002). The liability of foreignness, redux: A commentary. Journal of International Management, 8(3), 351–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of International CompetitivenessPoznan University of Economics and BusinessPoznańPoland
  2. 2.Vistula UniversityWarszawaPoland

Personalised recommendations