Advertisement

Endogenous Rerouting and Longevity in Systemic Organisations of Production

  • Marco Bellandi
  • Lisa De Propris
  • Erica Santini
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

Recent debate in regional studies has focused on place-based approaches to local development that are associated more and more to the investigation of systemic features able to trigger sustainable innovation paths and resilience against shocks and challenges. This chapter draws on the interpretative arguments related to the endogenous processes of innovation and systemic mechanisms of longevity and long-term competitiveness in industrial districts and local production systems. A critical review of the recent contributions on this topic allows a novel understanding of how—under certain conditions—local production systems can benefit from endogenous rerouting, especially in the face of the recent technological changes strongly impacting on traditional industrial organisations. The activation of latent mechanisms of transition may recombine embedded competences and useful knowledge to deliver path-breaking economic solutions that create new competitive advantages and allow longevity to local production systems.

Keywords

Industrial districts and local productions systems New wave of technological change Rerouting and longevity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the EU under H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions project ‘MAKERS: Smart Manufacturing for EU Growth and Prosperity’, grant agreement no. 691192.

References

  1. Antonelli, C. (1999). The microdynamics of technological change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2003). SMEs and the regional dimension of innovation. In B. T. Asheim et al. (Eds.), Regional innovation policy for small- medium enterprises (pp. 21–46). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey, D., Bellandi, M., Caloffi, A., & De Propris, L. (2010). Place-renewing leadership: Trajectories of change for mature manufacturing regions in Europe. Policy Studies, 31(4), 457–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey, D., & De Propris, L. (2014). Manufacturing reshoring and its limits: The UK automotive case. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7, 379–395.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becattini, G. (1990). The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion. In F. Pyke, G. Becattini, & W. Sengenberger (Eds.), Industrial districts and inter-firm co-operation in Italy (pp. 37–51). Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.Google Scholar
  6. Becattini, G. (2015). Beyond geo-sectoriality: The productive chorality of places. Investigaciones Regionales, 32, 31–41.Google Scholar
  7. Becattini, G., Bellandi, M., & De Propris, L. (Eds.). (2009). A handbook of industrial districts. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  8. Bellandi, M. (1996). On entrepreneurship, region and the constitution of scale and scope economies. European Planning Studies, 4, 421–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bellandi, M., & Caloffi, A. (2008). District internationalisation and trans-local development. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 20(6), 517–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bellandi, M., & De Propris, L. (2015). Three generations of industrial districts. Investigaciones Regionales, 32, 75–87.Google Scholar
  11. Bellandi, M., & Santini, E. (2017). Resilience and the role of arts and culture-based activities in mature industrial districts. European Planning Studies, 25(1), 88–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Belussi, F., & De Propris, L. (2013). They are industrial districts, but not as we know them! In F. Giarratani, G. J. D. Hewings, & P. McCann (Eds.), Handbook of industry studies and economic geography. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  13. Belussi, F., & Sedita, S. R. (2012). Industrial districts as open learning systems: Combining emergent and deliberate knowledge structures. Regional Studies, 46(2), 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(1), 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cooke, P. (2009). Technology clusters, industrial districts and regional innovation systems. In Becattini, G.; Bellandi, M. & De Propis, L. (Eds.). A handbook of industrial districts. Edward Elgar:Cheltenham, pp. 295-342.Google Scholar
  18. Corradini, C., & De Propris, L. (2016). Beyond local search: Bridging platforms and inter-sectoral technological integration. Research Policy, 46(1), 196–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crevoisier, O., & Jeannerat, H. (2009). Territorial knowledge dynamics: From the proximity paradigm to multi-location milieus. European Planning Studies, 17(8), 1223–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dei Ottati, G. (1994). Trust, interlinking transactions and credit in the industrial district. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18(6), 529–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dei Ottati, G. (2009). Semi-automatic and deliberate actions in the evolution of industrial districts. In G. Becattini, M. Bellandi, & L. De Propris (Eds.), A handbook of industrial districts (pp. 204–215). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  22. Frenken, K., Cefis, E., & Stam, E. (2015). Industrial dynamics and clusters: A survey. Regional Studies, 49(1), 10–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grabher, G. (1993). The weakness of strong ties: The lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area. In G. Grabher (Ed.), The embedded firm: On the socioeconomics of industrial networks (pp. 255–277). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hassink, R. (2017). Cluster decline and political lock-ins. In F. Belussi & J. L. Hervas Oliver (Eds.), Unfolding cluster evolution. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Hausmann, R., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2011). The network structure of economic output. Journal of Economic Growth, 16(4), 309–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hervas-Oliver, J. L., & Boix-Domenech, R. (2013). The economic geography of the meso-global spaces: Integrating multinationals and clusters at the local–global level. European Planning Studies, 21(7), 1064–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., & Boronat-Moll, C. (2014). Process innovation strategy in SMEs, organizational innovation and performance: A misleading debate? Small Business Economics, 43(4), 873–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hodson, M. (2008). Old industrial regions, technology, and innovation: Tensions of obduracy and transformation. Environment and Planning A, 40(5), 1057–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Iammarino, S., & McCann, P. (2006). The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers. Research Policy, 35(7), 1018–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36, 680–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kebir, L. L., & Crevoisier, O. (2008). Cultural resources and regional development: The case of the cultural legacy of watchmaking. European Planning Studies, 16, 1189–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kondratieff, N. D. (1979). The long waves in economic life. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 2, 519–562.Google Scholar
  35. Kuznets, S. (1965). Economic growth and structure. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  36. Lombardi, M. (2003). The evolution of local production systems: The emergence of the “invisible mind” and the evolutionary pressures towards more visible “minds”. Research Policy, 32(8), 1443–1462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Macneill, S., & Jeannerat, H. (2016). Beyond production and standards: Toward a status market approach to territorial Innovation and knowledge policy. Regional Studies, 50(2), 245–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Malerba, F. (1992). Learning by firms and incremental technical change. The Economic Journal, 102(413), 845–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marshall, A. (1919). Industry and trade (p. 2011). New York: Cosimo.Google Scholar
  41. Martin, R. (2011). The local geographies of the financial crisis: From the housing bubble to economic recession and beyond. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(4), 587–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2015). On the notion of regional economic resilience: Conceptualization and explanation. Journal of Economic Geography, 15, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Menzel, M. P., & Fornahl, D. (2010). Cluster life cycles—Dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(1), 205–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mokyr, J. (2002). The gifts of Athena: Historical origins of the knowledge economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Nooteboom, B. (2000). Learning and innovation in organizations and economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Perez, C. (2010). Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. In M. E. Porter (Ed.), On competition (pp. 309–348). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  48. Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014). How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 64–88.Google Scholar
  49. Porter, M. E., & Ketels, C. (2009). Clusters and industrial districts: Common roots, different perspectives. In G. Becattini, M. Bellandi, & L. De Propris (Eds.), A handbook of industrial districts (pp. 172–183). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  50. Santini, E. (2016, February). Apprendimento e cambiamento in sistemi produttivi locali in condizione di lock-in [Learning and change in local production systems in condition of lock-in]. PhD Thesis. Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa, Università degli Studi di Firenze.Google Scholar
  51. Staber, U. (2001). Spatial proximity and firm survival in a declining Industrial District: The case of knitwear firms in Baden-Wurttemberg. Regional Studies, 35(4), 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Storper, M., Kemeny, T., Makarem, N., & Osman, T. (2015). The rise and fall of urban economies: Lessons from San Francisco and Los Angeles. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ter Wal, A. L., & Boschma, R. (2011). Co-evolution of firms, industries and networks in space. Regional Studies, 45(7), 919–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Visser, E. J., & Boschma, R. (2004). Learning in districts: Novelty and lock-in in a regional context. European Planning Studies, 12, 793–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Bellandi
    • 1
  • Lisa De Propris
    • 2
  • Erica Santini
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Economics and ManagementUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.Department of Business and Labour Economics. Birmingham Business SchoolUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
  3. 3.Fondazione per la Ricerca e l’InnovazioneSesto FiorentinoItaly

Personalised recommendations