Beauty is put to sleep and woken up either once or twice, depending on the flip of a coin; after each waking, she will fall asleep and forget having woken. Upon waking, what should be her credence that the coin came up heads? Some say 1/2; others say 1/3. I propose that evidence supports a theory for you when your having that qualitative evidence would be more likely if the theory were true than if it were false. This view supports the “1/3” answer to the Sleeping Beauty problem. It also has applications to other arguments concerning self-locating beliefs: the Doomsday Argument fails, and the Fine Tuning Argument supports the Multiverse theory, if and only if it would be metaphysically possible for you to exist in a different universe.
- Bostrom, Nick. 2012. “A Primer on the Doomsday Argument”, http://www.anthropic-principle.com/?q=anthropic_principle/doomsday_argument, accessed June 3, 2017.
- Davies, Paul. 1983. God and the New Physics. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Davies, Paul. 1984. Superforce: The Search for a Grand Unified Theory of Nature. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Haub, Carl. 2011. “How Many People Have Ever Lived on Earth?”, Population Reference Bureau, http://www.prb.org/Publications/Articles/2002/HowManyPeopleHaveEverLivedonEarth.aspx, accessed June 3, 2017.
- Leslie, John. 1989. Universes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Susskind, Leonard. 2006. The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design. New York: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
- Tegmark, Max. 2003. “Parallel Universes”, Scientific American, May: 41–51.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau. 2017. “U.S. and World Population Clock”, https://www.census.gov/popclock/, accessed June 3, 2017.
- von Mises, Richard. 1957. Probability, Statistics and Truth, 2nd revised ed. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar