Paradoxes are robust, widespread intellectual illusions in which seemingly compelling reasoning generates an absurd or contradictory conclusion. Paradoxes are charming, fun, and may reveal deep confusions about important philosophical matters. A solution should dispel the illusion, so that the paradoxical reasoning no longer seems compelling. The following chapters offer solutions to ten difficult philosophical paradoxes.
- Huemer, Michael. n.d. “Correct Resolution of the Twin Paradox”, http://www.owl232.net/papers/twinparadox.pdf, accessed May 11, 2018.
- Rescher, Nicholas. 2001. Paradoxes: Their Roots, Range, and Resolution. Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
- Sainsbury, Richard M. 2009. Paradoxes, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Tierney, John. 1991. “Behind Monty Hall’s Doors: Puzzle, Debate and Answer?”, The New York Times, July 21, p. 1. Available at http://www.nytimes.com/1991/07/21/us/behind-monty-hall-s-doors-puzzle-debate-and-answer.html, accessed April 30, 2017.
- vos Savant, Marilyn. 1990–91. “Game Show Problem”, http://marilynvossavant.com/game-show-problem/, accessed April 30, 2017.