Advertisement

The Unnatural Personifications of the Physician’s Tale

  • Shawn Normandin
Chapter
Part of the The New Middle Ages book series (TNMA)

Abstract

Although it posits supreme female beauty (Virginia) and personifies Nature as a supreme artist, Chaucer’s Physician’s Tale is an aesthetic failure. This divisive and ugly narrative’s anti-aesthetic method culminates in Virginia’s decapitation. Like many other Chaucerian texts, the Physician’s Tale shifts its attention from nature to human social problems, but the shift does not glorify humanity or justify its separation from nonhumans. The tale’s anti-aesthetic language victimizes its human characters, suspending them between history and allegory, a crisis resolvable only through unnatural violence. The chapter discusses virginity’s paradoxical status in medieval culture as something both natural and unnatural. This chapter draws support from Paul de Man’s theories of allegory and from Jacques Derrida’s identification of poetry with an urge to memorize.

References

  1. Alan of Lille. 2013. Literary works. Translated and edited by Winthrop Wetherbee. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, Elizabeth. 2005. False fables and exemplary truth in later Middle English literature. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barney, Stephen A. 1979. Allegories of history, allegories of love. Hamden, CT: Archon Books.Google Scholar
  4. Bleeth, Kenneth. 2005. The Physician’s Tale. In Sources and analogues of the Canterbury Tales, ed. Robert M. Correale and Mary Hamel, vol. 2, 535–563. Cambridge, UK: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
  5. Bloch, R. Howard. 1989. Chaucer’s maiden’s head: “The Physician’s Tale” and the poetics of virginity. Representations 28: 113–134. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bott, Robin L. 2001. “O, keep me from their worse than killing lust”: Ideologies of rape and mutilation in Chaucer’s Physician’s Tale and Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus. In Representing rape in medieval and early modern literature, ed. Elizabeth Robertson and Christine M. Rose, 189–211. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, Emerson, Jr. 1981. What is Chaucer doing with the Physician and his tale? Philological Quarterly 60 (2): 129–149.Google Scholar
  8. Burger, Glenn. 1998. Doing what comes naturally: The Physician’s Tale and the Pardoner. In Masculinities in Chaucer: Approaches to maleness in the “Canterbury Tales” and “Troilus and Criseyde”, ed. Peter G. Beidler, 117–130. Cambridge, UK: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
  9. Chaucer, Geoffrey. 1987. The Riverside Chaucer. Edited by Larry D. Benson, 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  10. Chenu, M.-D. 1957. La théologie au douzième siècle. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  11. Coghill, Nevill. 1966. Chaucer’s narrative art in The Canterbury Tales. In Chaucer and Chaucerians: Critical studies in Middle English literature, ed. D.S. Brewer, 114–139. London: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome. 1996. Monster culture (seven theses). In Monster theory: Reading culture, ed. Jeffrey Jerome Cohen, 3–25. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crafton, John Micheal. 2005. “The cause of everiche maladye”: A new source of the Physician’s Tale. Philological Quarterly 84 (3): 259–285.Google Scholar
  14. Crocker, Holly A. 2007. Chaucer’s visions of manhood. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Delany, Sheila. 1981. Politics and the paralysis of poetic imagination in The Physician’s Tale. Studies in the Age of Chaucer 3: 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de Lorris, Guillaume, and Jean de Meun. 1992. Le Roman de la rose. Edited by Armand Strubel. Paris: Librairie Générale Française.Google Scholar
  17. de Man, Paul. 1979. Allegories of reading: Figural language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 1983. Blindness and insight: Essays in the rhetoric of contemporary criticism. 2nd ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 1989. Foreword to Carol Jacobs, The Dissimulating Harmony. In Critical writings, 1953–1978, ed. Lindsay Waters, 218–223. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 1996. Aesthetic ideology. Edited by Andrzej Warminski. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  21. Derrida, Jacques. 1995. Che cos’è la poesia? In Points: Interviews, 1974–1994, ed. Elisabeth Weber and trans. Peggy Kamuf et al., 288–299. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Douglass, Rebecca M. 2000. Ecocriticism and Middle English literature. In Medievalism and the academy II: Cultural studies, ed. David Metzger, 136–163. Cambridge, UK: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
  23. Edgar, Swift, and Angela M. Kinney, eds. 2010–13. The Vulgate Bible, 6 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fletcher, Angus. 2000. The sentencing of Virginia in the Physician’s Tale. Chaucer Review 34 (3): 300–308. https://doi.org/10.1353/cr.2000.0011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frier, Bruce W., and Thomas A.J. McGinn. 2004. A casebook on Roman family law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gower, John. 1901. The complete works of John Gower. Edited by G.C. Macaulay, vol. 3. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hanson, Thomas B. 1972. Chaucer’s Physician as storyteller and moralizer. Chaucer Review 7 (2): 132–139.Google Scholar
  28. Harley, Marta Powell. 1992. Last things first in Chaucer’s Physician’s Tale: Final judgment and the worm of conscience. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 91 (1): 1–16.Google Scholar
  29. Hegel, G.W.F. 1971. Vorlesungen über die Ästhetik. Edited by Rüdiger Bubner, vol. 1/2. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
  30. ———. 1998. Aesthetics: Lectures on fine art. Translated by T.M. Knox, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  31. Higden, Ranulf. 1869. Polychronicon Ranulphi Higden monachi Cestrensis; Together with the English translations of John Trevisa and of an uknown writer of the fifteenth century. Edited by Churchill Babington, vol. 2. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
  32. Jerome. 1845. Libri duo adversus Jovinianum. In Patrologia latina, ed. J.P. Migne, vol. 23, 211–338. Paris.Google Scholar
  33. Kant, Immanuel. 1974. Kritik der Urteilskraft. Edited by Wilhelm Weischedel. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  34. ———. 1987. Critique of judgment. Translated by Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
  35. Kelly, Kathleen Coyne. 1999. Menaced masculinity and imperiled virginity in the Morte Darthur. In Menacing virgins: Representing virginity in the Middle Ages and Renaissance, ed. Kathleen Coyne Kelly and Marina Leslie, 97–114. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kelly, Kathleen Coyne, and Marina Leslie. 1999a. Introduction: The epistemology of virginity. In Menacing virgins: Representing virginity in the Middle Ages and Renaissance, ed. Kathleen Coyne Kelly and Marina Leslie, 15–25. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
  37. Kerr-Koch, Kathleen. 2013. Romancing fascism: Modernity and allegory in Benjamin, de Man, Shelley. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  38. Knapp, Peggy A. 2008. Chaucerian aesthetics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Laes, Christian. 2013. Male virgins in Latin inscriptions from Rome. In Religious participation in ancient and medieval societies: Rituals, interaction and identity, ed. Sari Katajala-Peltomaa and Ville Vuolanto, 105–119. Rome: Institutum Romanum Finlandiae.Google Scholar
  40. Langland, William. 1995. The vision of Piers Plowman: A critical edition of the B-text based on Trinity College Cambridge MS B.15.17. Edited by A.V.C. Schmidt, 2nd ed. London: J.M. Dent.Google Scholar
  41. Lee, Brian S. 1987. The position and purpose of the Physician’s Tale. Chaucer Review 22 (2): 141–160.Google Scholar
  42. Lydgate, John. 1923. Lydgate’s Fall of Princes. Edited by Henry Bergen, vol. 1. Washington: The Carnegie Institution of Washington. https://archive.org/details/fallofprincesedi00lydguoft.
  43. Malory, Thomas. 2004. Le Morte Darthur. Edited by Stephen H.A. Shepherd. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  44. Mandel, Jerome. 1976. Governance in the Physician’s Tale. Chaucer Review 10 (4): 316–325.Google Scholar
  45. McInerney, Maud Burnett. 1998. Like a virgin: The problem of male virginity in the Symphonia. In Hildegard of Bingen: A book of essays, ed. Maud Burnett McInerney, 133–154. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  46. ———. 1999. Rhetoric, power, and integrity in the passion of the virgin martyr. In Menacing virgins: Representing virginity in the Middle Ages and Renaissance, ed. Kathleen Coyne Kelly and Marina Leslie, 50–70. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
  47. McTaggart, Anne. 2012. Shame and guilt in Chaucer. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Middleton, Anne. 1973. The Physician’s Tale and love’s martyrs: “Ensamples mo than ten” as a method in the Canterbury Tales. Chaucer Review 8 (1): 9–32.Google Scholar
  49. Miller, D.A. 1981. Narrative and its discontents: Problems of closure in the traditional novel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Minnis, A.J. 1982. Chaucer and pagan antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Morton, Timothy. 2007. Ecology without nature: Rethinking environmental aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  52. ———. 2010. The ecological thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  53. ———. 2016. Dark ecology: For a logic of future coexistence. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Newman, Barbara. 2003. God and the goddesses: Vision, poetry, and belief in the Middle Ages. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Noguchi, Shunichi. 1992. Chaucer’s concept of nature. In Chaucer to Shakespeare: Essays in honour of Shinsuke Ando, ed. Toshiyuki Takamiya and Richard Beadle, 25–31. Cambridge, UK: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
  56. Ogilvie, R.M. 1965. A commentary on Livy, books 1–5. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  57. Patterson, Lee. 1991. Chaucer and the subject of history. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  58. Paxson, James J. 1994. The poetics of personification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Petrus Pictaviensis. 1855. Sententiarum. In Patrologia latina, ed. J.-P. Migne, vol. 211, 783–1280. Paris.Google Scholar
  60. Pitcher, John A. 2003. Chaucer’s wolf: Exemplary violence in The Physician’s Tale. Genre 36: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Prior, Sandra Pierson. 1999. Virginity and sacrifice in Chaucer’s “Physician’s Tale”. In Constructions of widowhood and virginity in the Middle Ages, ed. Cindy L. Carlson and Angela Jane Weisl, 165–180. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  62. Pugh, Tison. 2014. Chaucer’s (anti-)eroticisms and the queer Middle Ages. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Ramsey, Lee C. 1972. “The sentence of it sooth is”: Chaucer’s Physician’s Tale. Chaucer Review 6 (3): 185–197.Google Scholar
  64. Redfield, Marc. 2003. The politics of aesthetics: Nationalism, gender, Romanticism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1964. Œuvres complètes. Edited by Bernard Gagnebin et al., vol. 3. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  66. Sanok, Catherine. 2002. The geography of genre in the Physician’s Tale and Pearl. New Medieval Literatures 5: 177–201.Google Scholar
  67. Schiff, Randy P. 2016. The Physician and the forester: Virginia, venison, and the biopolitics of vital property. In The politics of ecology: Land, life, and law in medieval Britain, ed. Randy P. Schiff and Joseph Taylor, 82–103. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Siewers, Alfred K. 2009. Strange beauty: Ecocritical approaches to early medieval landscape. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Spearing, A.C. 1999. Classical antiquity in Chaucer’s chivalric romances. In Chivalry, knighthood and war in the Middle Ages, ed. Susan J. Ridyard, 53–73. Sewanee, TN: University of the South Press.Google Scholar
  70. Speed, Diane. 1989. Language and perspective in the Physician’s Tale. In Words and wordsmiths: A volume for H. L. Rogers, ed. G. Barnes et al., 119–136. Sidney: University of Sydney Department of English.Google Scholar
  71. Spenser, Edmund. 1978. The faerie queene. Edited by Thomas P. Roche, Jr. and C. Patrick O’Donnell, Jr. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  72. Stanbury, Sarah. 2004. EcoChaucer: Green ethics and medieval literature. Chaucer Review 39 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Treharne, Elaine. 2012. The Physician’s Tale as hagioclasm. In Dark Chaucer: An assortment, ed. Myra Seaman, Eileen A. Joy, and Nicola Masciandaro, 159–169. Brooklyn, NY: Punctum Books.Google Scholar
  74. Welsh, Andrew. 2000. Story and wisdom in Chaucer: The Physician’s Tale and The Manciple’s Tale. In Manuscript, narrative, lexicon: Essays on literary and cultural transmission in honor of Whitney F. Bolton, ed. Robert Boenig and Kathleen Davis, 76–95. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
  75. White, Hugh. 2000. Nature, sex, and goodness in a medieval literary tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wogan-Browne, Jocelyn. 1994. The virgin’s tale. In Feminist readings in Middle English literature: The Wife of Bath and all her sect, ed. Ruth Evans and Lesley Johnson, 167–195. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shawn Normandin
    • 1
  1. 1.Sungkyunkwan UniversitySeoulKorea (Republic of)

Personalised recommendations