Advertisement

Expanding the Turn: Using Poetry to Prepare Students for a Post-Truth World

  • Conor Bracken
Chapter

Abstract

Studies continue to demonstrate that many people are dismayingly (and increasingly) unable to distinguish dubious from credible sources. This, coupled with the fact that a majority of Americans get their news from social media, reinforces the need for educators to help their students acquire a versatile set of literacy practices. This chapter proposes, first, that poetry is a beneficial site for developing and refining these practices, and, second, that analyzing poems through the lens of the poetic turn is a robust method for doing so. With reference to the critical work of John Crowe Ransom, Ellen Bryant Voigt, Michael Theune, and Randall Jarrell, this chapter calls for more instructional attention to be paid to structural elements of poems, as this attention will help students build confidence in analyzing poetry while attuning them to the linguistic and rhetorical subtleties necessary for sorting reliable information from streams of dubious data.

References

  1. Bonta, Dave. 2009. Between Dream and Metaphor: Haiku of Yosa Buson. Via Negativa (blog), December 6. http://www.vianegativa.us/2009/12/between-dream-and-metaphor-haiku-of-yosa-buson/.
  2. Brooks, Cleanth. 1947. The Well Wrought Urn: Studies in the Structure of Poetry. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
  3. Gottfried, Jeffery, and Elisa Shearer. 2016. News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2016. Pew Research Center. http://journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/.
  4. Greene, Roland, Stephen Cushman, Clare Cavanagh, Jahan Ramazani, Paul Rouzer, Harris Feinsod, David Marno, and Alexandra Slessarev. 2012. The Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics. 4th ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jarrell, Randall. 2002. Levels and Opposites: Structure in Poetry. Georgia Review 56 (1): 389–404.Google Scholar
  6. Lerner, Ben. 2016. The Hatred of Poetry. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  7. Matejka, Adrian. 2017. Map to the Stars. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  8. Ransom, John Crowe. 1984a. Criticism as Pure Speculation. In Selected Essays of John Crowe Ransom, ed. Thomas Daniel Young and John Hindle, 128–146. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 1984b. Wanted: An Ontological Critic. In Selected Essays of John Crowe Ransom, ed. Thomas Daniel Young and John Hindle, 147–179. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Shakespeare, William. 2017. Sonnet 29: When, in Disgrace with Fortune and Men’s Eyes. Poetry Foundation. http://poetryfoundation.org/poems/45090/sonnet-29-when-in-disgrace-with-fortune-and-mens-eyes/. Accessed 9 Aug 2017.
  11. Sharif, Solmaz. 2016. Look. Minneapolis, MN: Graywolf.Google Scholar
  12. Stanford History Education Group. 2016. Evaluating Information: The Cornerstone of Civic Online Reasoning. Stanford University. http://stacks.stanford.edu/file/druid:fv751yt5934/SHEG%20Evaluating%20Information%20Online.pdf/. Accessed 25 July 2017.
  13. Theune, Michael, ed. 2007. Structure and Surprise: Engaging Poetic Turns. New York: Teachers and Writers Collaborative.Google Scholar
  14. Voigt, Ellen Bryant. 1999. The Flexible Lyric. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  15. Wineburg, Sam, and Sarah McGrew. 2016. Why Students Can’t Google Their Way to the Truth. Education Week. http://edweek.org/we/articles/2016/11/02/why-students-cant-google-their-way-to.html/. Accessed 25 July 2017.
  16. Wright, James. 2007. Collected Poems. Middletown: Wesleyan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Conor Bracken
    • 1
  1. 1.University of FindlayFindlayUSA

Personalised recommendations