Advertisement

A Taxonomic Study of Innovation in the MENA Region Economies: Reflections on Entrepreneurism in Egypt and Qatar

  • Amir Forouharfar
  • Mahshid Sazegar
  • Victoria Hill
  • Nezameddin Faghih
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

Abstract

The research goal of this paper is to study the impact of innovation in an economy. This has an effect not only on the economy in general, but particularly on entrepreneurism. To narrow the focus of the study, the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region was chosen and two countries were selected: Egypt, which is mainly in North Africa but partially in West Asia; and Qatar, which is in the most eastern portion of the Arabian Peninsula. Egypt is the most populated country in MENA, while Qatar has one of the smallest populations. Numerical taxonomy was applied to secondary data from Global Innovation Index (GII) for 2008–2017 for Egypt, Qatar and Switzerland, which was chosen as the benchmark country. Egypt has an efficiency-driven economy while Qatar and Switzerland have innovation-driven economies. Data from these three countries formed the compound distance matrices (i.e. primary data) of the research; the GII’s annual country reports were used to specify the innovation distances within all three countries (i.e. secondary data). The results of the paper demonstrated that while emulating Switzerland’s innovation success remains a long-term goal for many countries, Qatar is far more innovative than Egypt.

Keywords

Innovation Entrepreneur Entrepreneurial Innovation-driven vs. efficiency-driven MENA Egypt Qatar Numerical taxonomy 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authorization granted to use the data and material originally provided by WIPO (the World Intellectual Property Organization) is gratefully acknowledged. The secretariat of WIPO assumes no responsibility or liability with regard to the transformation of this data.

References

  1. Arnold RD, Wade JP (2015) A definition of systems thinking: a systems approach. Procedia Comput Sci 44:669–678.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BBC (2018) China offers 10-year visas to ‘high end talent’. 5 Jan 2018, London. Available via the World Wide Web. http://www.bbc.com/news/business-42575436. Accessed 30 Jan 2018
  3. Faghih N, Bavandpour M, Forouharfar A (2016) Biological metaphor and analogy upon organizational management research within the development of clinical organizational pathology. QSci Connect 2016(2):4.  https://doi.org/10.5339/connect.2016.4. Accessed 2 Dec 2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Global Innovation Index (2017) Innovation feeding the world, Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO: Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva. https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/about-gii#reports. Accessed 16 Dec 2017
  5. Global Innovation Indices (2008–2017) http://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4064. Accessed 1 Dec 2017
  6. Nabli MK, Keller J, Nassif C, Silva-Jáuregui C (2006) The political economy of industrial policy in the Middle East and North Africa. World Bank, Washington, DC. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/28426 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nambisan S, Sawhney M (2007) The innovation Bazaar. Harv Bus Rev. https://hbr.org/2007/06/a-buyers-guide-to-the-innovation-bazaar. Accessed 20 Jan 2018
  8. OECD (2009) Innovation and growth: rational for an innovation strategy. OECD, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/39374789.pdf. Accessed 23 Feb 2018
  9. OECD and Eurostat (2005) Oslo manual: guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, 3rd edn. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/oslo-manual_9789264013100-en. Accessed 20 Jan 2018
  10. Salehi Esfahani H (2006) Are examination of the political economy of growth in the MENA countries. In: Nugent JB, Hashem Pesaran M (eds) Explaining growth in the Middle East, Contributions to economic analysis, vol 278. Emerald Group, Bingley, pp 61–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. World Bank (2017) Unemployment, youth total (% of total labor force ages 15–24). World Bank Group, Washington, DC. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.UEM.1524.ZS. Accessed 18 Dec 2017
  12. World Economic Forum (2018) Global competitiveness report 2017–2018. World Economic Forum, Geneva. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR2017–2018/05FullReport/TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2017–2018.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amir Forouharfar
    • 1
  • Mahshid Sazegar
    • 2
  • Victoria Hill
    • 3
  • Nezameddin Faghih
    • 4
  1. 1.University of Sistan and BaluchestanZahedanIran
  2. 2.Fars Engineering AssociationShirazIran
  3. 3.Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Languages and Continuous TrainingMoulay Ismail UniversityMeknesMorocco
  4. 4.UNESCO Chair in EntrepreneurshipParisFrance

Personalised recommendations