Advertisement

The Impact of Internal Corporate Governance Mechanisms on Corporate Social Performance in the Banking Industry

  • José L. Fernández Sánchez
  • María D. Odriozola
  • Manuel Luna
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions book series (SBFI)

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to explore the relationship between corporate governance (CG) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) by analysing the effect of internal governance and monitoring mechanisms on the corporate social performance (CSP) of banks. To carry out our analysis, we propose to regress both a fixed-effects and a random-effects model using an unbalanced panel composed of 118 banks from 19 countries. The overall period of analysis runs from 2002 to 2014, although it has been divided into two different sub-periods before and after the banking system crisis: period 1 (2002–2007) and period 2 (2008–2014), in order to analyse the existence of a structural change with different impacts on the CG-CSR relationship. This research shows that some internal governance and monitoring mechanisms, namely, those related to controlling ownership and the structure of the board of directors, have an important influence on the social performance of banks, although these mechanisms were only relevant during the crisis period (2008–2014).

Keywords

Corporate governance Corporate social responsibility Corporate social performance Governance mechanisms Banking industry 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the UCEIF Foundation and Santander Bank for allowing us access to the Datastream and ASSET4 databases.

References

  1. Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 447–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguilera, R. V., Desender, K., Bednar, M. K., & Lee, J. H. (2015). Connecting the dots: Bringing external corporate governance into the corporate governance puzzle. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 483–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berle, A., & Means, G. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Chintrakarn, P., Jiraporn, P., Kim, J., & Kim, Y. S. (2016). The effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 45(1), 102–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deckop, J. R., Merriman, K. K., & Gupta, S. (2006). The effects of CEO pay structure on corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 32(3), 329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elkington, J. (2006). Governance for sustainability. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(6), 522–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fabrizi, M., Mallin, C., & Michelon, G. (2014). The role of CEO’s personal incentives in driving corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(2), 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fassin, Y., & Gosselin, D. (2011). The collapse of a European bank in the financial crisis: An analysis from stakeholder and ethical perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grove, H., Patelli, L., Victoravich, L. M., & Xu, P. (2011). Corporate governance and performance in the wake of the financial crisis: Evidence from US commercial banks. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(5), 418–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guest, P. M. (2009). The impact of board size on firm performance: Evidence from the UK. European Journal of Finance, 15(4), 385–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harjoto, M. A., & Jo, H. (2011). Corporate Governance and CSR Nexus. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hong, B., Li, Z., & Minor, D. (2016). Corporate governance and executive compensation for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(1), 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9), 834–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jain, T., & Jamali, D. (2016). Looking inside the black box: The effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 253–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jamali, D., Safieddine, A. M., & Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 443–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jensen, M. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jizi, M. I., Salama, A., Dixon, R., & Stratling, R. (2014). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from the US banking sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 601–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 351–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2012). The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785–1824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Surroca, J., & Tribo, J. A. (2008). Managerial entrenchment and corporate social performance. Journal of Business, Finance, and Accounting, 35(5–6), 748–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Walls, J. L., Berrone, P., & Phan, P. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link? Strategic Management Journal, 33(8), 885–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • José L. Fernández Sánchez
    • 1
  • María D. Odriozola
    • 1
  • Manuel Luna
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Business AdministrationUniversity of CantabriaSantanderSpain

Personalised recommendations