School Environments: Friend or Foe for Creativity Education and Research?
Creativity is considered a 21st century competency. Creativity is integrated in national curricula and in international texts. However, despite its recognition by educational authorities, such as Ministries of Education, creativity is not well implemented in classrooms. Indeed, even when educational practitioners admit that creativity is important for education, it does not mean they seek systematically to implement it in schools. This difficulty is one of the significant issues that creativity research encounters. In response, this chapter aims to provide a reflection, based on the current literature, about the place of creativity in school environments. Considering the past 50 years of research and reflection on creativity, several factors hindering or fostering creativity implementation in education and research are evoked regularly. Hence, we propose an overview of these factors, with the goal that practitioners and researchers take into account observed situations, relieve the current duress under which creativity finds itself, and in the future contribute to field research on creativity and ultimately the development of creativity in schools.
KeywordsCreativity Curricula Education Environment Creativity research School Teacher’s practices
- Barbot, B., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. (2015). Creative potential in educational settings: Its nature, measure, and nurture. Education, 43(4), 371–381.Google Scholar
- Barbot, B., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. (2016). The generality-specificity of creativity: Exploring the structure of creative potential with EPoC. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 178–187. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org.faraway.u-paris10.fr/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. (2015). La créativité de l’enfant [Child’s creativity]. Paris: Mardaga.Google Scholar
- Besançon, M., Lubart, T., & Barbot, B. (2013). Creative giftedness and educational opportunities. Educational & Child Psychology, 30(2), 79–88.Google Scholar
- Cachia, R., Ferrari, A., Ala-Mutka, K., & Punie, Y. (2010). Creative learning and innovative teaching: Final report on the study on creativity and innovation in education in the EU member states. Seville, Spain: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.Google Scholar
- Cropley, A. J. (2009). Creativity in education & learning: A guide for teachers and educators. Abingdon, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
- Dunn, L. L. S. (2004). Cognitive playfulness, innovativeness, and belief of essentialness: Characteristics of educators who have the ability to make enduring changes in the integration of technology into the classroom environment. University of North Texas, Texas, unpublished doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/118769/.
- Edmunds, F. (2004). An introduction to Steiner education: The Waldorf School. Hillside Forest Row, UK: Sophia Books, Rudolf Steiner Press.Google Scholar
- Freinet, C. (1994). Oeuvres pédagogiques [Educational works] (Tome 1). Lonrai, France: Seuil.Google Scholar
- Lubart, T., & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). An investment approach to creativity: Theory and data. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 269–302). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Lucas, B., Claxton, G., & Spencer, E. (2013). Progression in student creativity in school?: First steps towards new form of formative assessments. Brussels, Belgium: OECD Education Working Paper, OECD.Google Scholar
- Montessori, M. (1958/2004). Pédagogie scientifique: tome 2, éducation élémentaire [Scientific pedagogy: Volume 2, elementary school]. Genève, Suisse: Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar
- Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2015, May). Framework for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/about-us/p21-framework
- Pianta, R. C., LaParo, K. M., & Hamre, B. (2008). Classroom Assessment Scoring System™ (CLASS™) manual. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar