Advertisement

Pro-Science Rhetoric or a Research Program? – Naturalism(s) in the Cognitive-Evolutionary Study of Religion

Chapter
Part of the New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion book series (NASR, volume 4)

Abstract

Aku Visala takes a closer look at the role of naturalism in CSR. The cognitive-evolutionary study of religion takes itself as “naturalizing” not only the study of religion, but the humanities as a whole. Apart from the obvious denial of non-supernatural causal factors, it is sometimes difficult to see whether this naturalization involves anything more than a general rhetorical strategy meant to play up the “science” part (and downplay other, “non-scientific” approaches). In his paper, Visala seeks to identify the basic philosophical assumptions of the naturalization project, present some critical points about them, and suggest what he considers to be more plausible assumptions instead. The basic assumptions of the naturalization project include a commitment to a specific kind of unity of science, a commitment to a certain kind of inter-level reduction and explanatory fundamentalism and a deep suspicion towards causal factors above the cognitive/psychological level. He suggests that these commitments suffer from a number of problems and the goals of the cognitive-evolutionary study can be achieved just as well, or even better, by adopting weaker and more plausible commitments. Here he briefly discusses some new accounts of mechanistic explanation, Robert McCauley’s model of inter- and intra-level relationships and the idea of explanatory pluralism. He conjectures that loosening the “naturalistic” constraints of the cognitive-evolutionary study of religion might result in a more pluralistic (but nevertheless strict) approach to religion.

Keywords

Cognitive science of religion Naturalism Explanation Explanation of religion Explanatory pluralism 

References

  1. Atran, Scott. 2002. In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Boyer, Pascal. 1993. Cognitive aspects of religious symbolism. In Cognitive aspects of religious symbolism, ed. Pascal Boyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clarke, Steve. 2009. Naturalism, science and the supernatural. Sophia 48: 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clayton, Philip. 2004. Mind and emergence: From quantum to consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Craver, Carl F. 2007. Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Craver, Carl F., and Lindley Darden. 2013. In search of mechanisms: Discoveries across the life sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Draper, Paul. 2005. God, science, and naturalism. In The Oxford handbook of philosophy of religion, ed. William J. Wainwright. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Flanagan, Owen. 2006. Varieties of naturalism. In The Oxford handbook of religion and science, ed. P. Clayton and Z. Simpson, 2006. New York: Oxford University Press on Demand.Google Scholar
  9. Garfinkel, Alan. 1981. Forms of explanation: Rethinking questions in social theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Goetz, Stewart, and Charles Taliaferro. 2008. Naturalism. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Kim, Jaegwon. 2007. Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kitcher, Philip. 1992. The naturalists return. The Philosophical Review 101: 53–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leiter, Brian. 1998. Naturalism and naturalized jurisprudence. In Analysing law: New essays in legal theory, ed. B. Bix. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. McCauley, Robert N. 2007. Reduction: Models of cross-scientific relations and their implications for the psychology-neuroscience interface. In Philosophy of psychology and cognitive science, ed. Paul Thagard. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  15. McCauley, Robert, and William Bechtel. 2001. Explanatory pluralism and heuristic identity theory. Theory & Psychology 11: 736–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pyysiäinen, Ilkka. 2011. Reduction and explanatory pluralism in the cognitive science of religion. In Changing minds: Religion and cognition through the ages, ed. Istvan Czachesz and Tamas Biro. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
  17. Raatikainen, Panu. 2010. Causation, exclusion, and the special sciences. Erkenntnis: An International Journal of Analytic Philosophy 73: 349–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rea, Michael Cannon. 2002. World without design: The ontological consequences of naturalism. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosenberg, Alex. 1996. A field guide to recent species of naturalism. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Slingerland, Edward. 2008a. What science offers the humanities: Integrating body and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ———. 2008b. Who is afraid of reductionism? The study of religion in the age of cognitive science. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 76: 375–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sperber, Dan, and Hiram Caton. 1996. Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Stoljar, Daniel. 2010. Physicalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Visala, Aku. 2011. Naturalism, theism and the cognitive study of religion: Religion explained? Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  25. Wiebe, Donald. 2005. Beyond thick descriptions and interpretive sciences: Explaining religious meaning. In How to do comparative religion: Three ways, many goals, ed. Rene Gothoni. De Gruyter: Berlin.Google Scholar
  26. Woodward, James. 2005. Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. New York: Oxford university press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Theology HelsinkiUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations