Advertisement

The Cognitive Science of Religion, Philosophy and Theology: A Survey of the Issues

  • Hans van Eyghen
  • Rik Peels
  • Gijsbert van den Brink
Chapter
Part of the New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion book series (NASR, volume 4)

Abstract

Cognitive Science of Religion (CSR) is still a rather young discipline. Depending on what one deems to be the first paper or book in the field, the discipline is now almost forty or almost thirty years old. Philosophical and theological discussion on CSR started in the late 2000s. From its onset, the main focus has been the (potential) epistemic consequences of CSR, and this focus is dominant even today. Some of those involved in the debate discussed the relevance of CSR for further issues in philosophy of religion, and other have examined how CSR weighs in on various theological questions. Finally, a small number of philosophers offered criticisms or support for various CSR-theories. In this chapter, we give an overview of the debates so far and provide an outline of the book.

References

  1. Baker-Hytch, Max. 2014. Religious diversity and epistemic luck. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76: 171–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett, Justin L. 2007. Is the spell really broken? Biopsychological explanations of religion and theistic belief. Theology and Science 5: 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ———. 2012. Towards a cognitive science of Christianity. In The Blackwell companion to science and Christianity, ed. J.B. Stump and Alan G. Padgett. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Barrett, Justin L., and Ian M. Church. 2013. Should CSR give Atheists epistemic assurance? On Beer-goggles, BFFs, and skepticism regarding religious belief. The Monist 96: 311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braddock, Matthew. 2016. Debunking arguments and the cognitive science of religion. Theology and Science 14: 268–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, Kelly James, and Justin L. Barrett. 2010. Reformed epistemology and the cognitive science of religion. Faith and Philosophy 27: 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 2011. Reidian religious epistemology and the cognitive science of religion. Journal of the American academy of religion.: 1–37.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, Kelly James, and Dani Rabinowitz. 2011. Knowledge and the objection to religious belief from cognitive science. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3: 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, Kelly James, and Justin T. Winslett. 2011. The evolutionary psychology of Chinese religion: Pre-Qin high gods as punishers and rewarders. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 79: 928–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dawkins, Richard. 2007. The God delusion. London: Black Swan.Google Scholar
  11. De Cruz, Helen. 2014. Cognitive science of religion and the study of theological concepts. Topoi 33: 487–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Cruz, Helen, and Johan De Smedt. 2012. Reformed and evolutionary epistemology and the noetic effects of sin. International Journal Philosophy Religion 74: 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ———. 2015. A natural history of natural theology. In The cognitive science of theology and philosophy of religion. Cambridge/London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dennett, Daniel Clement. 2006. Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  15. Draper, Paul, and Ryan Nichols. 2013. Diagnosing bias in philosophy of religion. The Monist 96: 420–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Green, Adam. 2013. Cognitive science and the natural knowledge of God. The Monist 96: 399–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodnick, Liz. 2016. A De Jure criticism of theism. Open Theology 2(1).Google Scholar
  18. Guthrie, Stewart. 1980. A cognitive theory of religion. Current Anthropology 21: 181–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Horst, Steven. 2013. Notions of intuition in cognitive science of religion. The Monist 96(3): 377–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, James W. 2016. Can science explain religion? The cognitive science debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jong, Jonathan, Christopher Kavanagh, and Aku Visala. 2015. Born idolaters: The limits of the philosophical implications of the cognitive science of religion. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 57: 244–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lawson, E. Thomas, and Robert N. McCauley. 1990. Rethinking religion: Connecting cognition and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Leech, David, and Aku Visala. 2011a. The cognitive science of religion: A modified theist response. Religious Studies 47: 301–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ———. 2011b. The cognitive science of religion: Implications for theism? Zygon 46: 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. ———. 2014. The cognitive science of religion and theism again: A reply to Leo Näreaho. Religious Studies 50: 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lim, Daniel. 2016. Cognitive science of religion and folk theistic belief. Zygon 51: 949–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCauley, Robert N. 2011. Why religion is natural and science is not. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Miller, Ed LeRoy, and Stanley James Grenz. 1998. Fortress introduction to contemporary theologies. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  29. Murray, Michael J. 2008. Four arguments that the cognitive psychology of religion undermines the justification of religious belief. In The evolution of religion: Studies, theories, and critiques, ed. J. Bulbulia et al. Santa Margarita: Collins Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  30. ———. 2009. Scientific explanations of religion and the justification of religious belief. In The believing primate, ed. J. Schloss and M.J. Murray. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Murray, Michael J., and Lyn Moore. 2009. Costly signaling and the origin of religion. Journal of Cognition and Culture 9: 225–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Näreaho, Leo. 2008. The cognitive science of religion: Philosophical observations. Religious Studies 44: 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. ———. 2014. Cognitive science of religion and theism: How can they be compatible? Religious Studies 50: 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nikkel, David H. 2015. The Daulistic, discarnate picture that haunts the cognitive science of religion. Zygon 50: 621–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nola, Robert. 2013. Do naturalistic explanations of religious beliefs debunk religion? In A new science of religion, ed. Gregory W. Dawes and James Maclaurin. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Oviedo, Lluis. 2008. Is a complete biocognitive account of religion feasible? Zygon 43: 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peterson, Michael, William Hasker, Bruce Reichenbach, and David Basinger. 2013. Reason & religious belief. An introduction to the philosophy of religion. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Pres.Google Scholar
  38. Plantinga, Alvin. 2011. Where the conflict really lies: Science, religion, and naturalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Plantinga, Alvin, and Nicholas P. Wolterstorff, eds. 1983. Faith and rationality: Reason and belief in God. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  40. Pritchard, Duncan. 2005. Epistemic luck. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sagar, Richard Jonathan. 2011. The cognitive science of religion/atheism and its impact on Plantinga’s reformed epistemology. (Mphil thesis University of Birmingham).Google Scholar
  42. Schloss, Jeffrey P., and Michael J. Murray. 2011. Evolutionary accounts of belief in supernatural punishment: A critical review. Religion, Brain & Behavior 1: 46–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shults, F. Leron. 2014. Theology after the birth of god: Atheist conceptions in cognition and culture. London: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smedes, Taede. 2014. Emil Brunner revisited: On the cognitive science of religion, the Imago Dei, and revelation. Zygon 49: 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Teehan, John. 2010. In the name of God: The evolutionary origins of religious ethics and violence. Wiley Online Library.Google Scholar
  46. Thurow, J.C. 2013. Does cognitive science show belief in god to be irrational? The epistemic consequences of the cognitive science of religion. International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion 74: 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vainio, Olli-Pekka. 2016. What does theology have to do with religion? Dual-process accounts, cognitive science of religion and a curious blind spot in contemporary theorizing. Open Theology 2: 106–112.Google Scholar
  48. Van den Brink, Gijsbert. Forthcoming. Reformed theology and evolutionary theory. Grand Rapids Michigan: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  49. Van Eyghen, Hans. Forthcoming. Is supernatural belief unreliably formed? International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. Google Scholar
  50. Van Leeuwen, Neil. 2017. Two paradigms for religious representation: The physicist and the playground (A reply to Levy). Cognition 164: 206–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Van Slyke, James A. 2011. The cognitive science of religion. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  52. Visala, Aku. 2011. Naturalism, theism and the cognitive study of religion: Religion explained? Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  53. Walker, Ruth. 2006. Rescuing religious non-realism from Cupitt. The Heythrop Journal 47: 426–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wilkins, John S., and Paul E. Griffiths. 2013. Evolutionary debunking arguments in three domains. In A new science of religion, ed. Gregory W. Dawes and James Maclaurin. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans van Eyghen
    • 1
  • Rik Peels
    • 1
  • Gijsbert van den Brink
    • 1
  1. 1.Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations