Advertisement

Integrating Healthy Personality Development and Educational Practices: The Case of Student Engagement with School

  • Paulo A. S. MoreiraEmail author
  • Diana Cunha
  • Richard Inman
  • Joana Oliveira
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary Clinical Neuroscience book series (CCNE)

Abstract

Background: Positive, or healthy, personality development is a strong predictor of major lifelong adaptive processes and outcomes across different functioning domains. Consequently, the systematic promotion of healthy personality in children and adolescents via education contexts and practices is an imperative for contemporary societies. There is a growing consensus about the need for societies to shift from a paradigm of conventional schooling to person-centered schools. Structural features of person-centered schools include (a) a conception of individuals as whole persons, (b) an emphasis on subjective experience and on processes, (c) centrality of positive relationships, and (d) an emphasis on positive features of psychobiological functioning. This shift may be perceived as intangible, or as implying abrupt and disruptive changes. However, the promotion of healthy personality development in schools is not a question of all or nothing, but rather a continuum. Further, there are a substantial number of schools already promoting healthy or positive development, even if unintentionally or via means of processes and constructs more typical of school and educational traditions. Aims: We argue that student engagement with school is a paradigmatic example of a narrower expression of personality in the education and school context. We aim to describe how the promotion of healthy personality development is possible within the context of current educational practices, including school improvement efforts to reach educational excellence and equity. Conclusions: As an expression of personality, student engagement with school is a process that is malleable to intervention and particularly sensitive to interpersonal influences (including teacher-students relationships). Student engagement with school is, therefore, an example of how personality and educational constructs can be integrated into effective educational and school practices, including in school improvement and re-restructuring efforts.

Keywords

Student engagement Person-centered schools Character Health 

References

  1. Ainscow, M., Dyson, A., Goldrick, S., & West, M. (2013). Developing equitable education systems. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ainscow, M., & Sandill, A. (2010). Developing inclusive education systems: The role of organisational cultures and leadership. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(4), 401–416.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110802504903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427–445.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archambault, I., Pagani, L. S., & Fitzpatrick, C. (2013). Transactional associations between classroom engagement and relations with teachers from first through fourth grade. Learning and Instruction, 23(23), 1–239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.09.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker, J. A. (2006). Contributions of teacher-child relationships to positive school adjustment during elementary school. Journal of School Psychology, 44(3), 211–229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker, J. A., Grant, S., & Morlock, L. (2008). The teacher-student relationship as a developmental context for children with internalizing or externalizing behavior problems. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Becker, B. E., & Luthar, S. S. (2002). Social-emotional factors affecting achievement outcomes among disadvantaged students: Closing the achievement gap. Educational Psychologist, 37(4), 197–214.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3704_1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Berry, B., & Eckert, J. (2012). Creating teacher incentives for school excellence and equity. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved [04/04/2019] from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/creating-teacher-incentivesGoogle Scholar
  9. Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., & Brown, P. (2011). Examining the effect of class size on classroom engagement and teacher-pupil interaction: Differences in relation to pupil prior attainment and primary vs. secondary schools. Learning and Instruction, 21(6), 715–730.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cavendish, W. (2013). Student perceptions of school efforts to facilitate student involvement, school commitment, self-determination, and high school graduation. Social Psychology of Education, 16(2), 257–275.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9212-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, X., Chang, L., Liu, H., & He, Y. (2008). Effects of the peer group on the development of social functioning and academic achievement: A longitudinal study in Chinese children. Child Development, 79(2), 235–251.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01123.xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cloninger, C. R. (2004). Feeling good: The science of well-being. New York, NY: Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Cloninger, C. R. (2009). Evolution of human brain functions: The functional structure of human consciousness. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 43(11), 994–1006.  https://doi.org/10.3109/00048670903270506CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cloninger, C. R. (2013). The importance of ternary awareness for overcoming the inadequacies of contemporary psychiatry. Revista de Psiquiatria Clínica, 40(3), 110–113.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-60832013000300006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cloninger, C. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Przybeck, T. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50(12), 975–990.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820240059008CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Dias, A., Oliveira, J., & Moreira, P. A. S. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the school improvement teacher survey. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychology, 4(2), 163–184.Google Scholar
  17. Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 225–241.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00725.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fullarton, S. (2002). Student engagement with school: Individual and school-level influences. SAY Research Reports. Longitudinal Surveys of Australian Youth Research Report, 27, 1–43.Google Scholar
  20. Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148–162.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garcia, D., Lundström, S., Brändström, S., Råstam, M., Cloninger, C. R., Kerekes, N., … Anckarsäter, H. (2013). Temperament and character in the Child and Adolescent Twin Study in Sweden (CATSS): Comparison to the general population, and genetic structure analysis. PLoS One, 8(8), e70475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gut, J., Reimann, G., & Grob, A. (2013). A contextualized view on long-term predictors of academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 436.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hofman, R. H., Dijkstra, N. J., & Hofman, W. H. A. (2009). School self-evaluation and student achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(1), 47–68.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450802664115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hughes, J. N., Luo, W., Kwok, O.-M., & Loyd, L. K. (2008). Teacher-student support, effortful engagement, and achievement: A 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262–273.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Korthagen, F. A. J. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1), 77–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Law, P. C., Cuskelly, M., & Carroll, A. (2013). Young people’s perceptions of family, peer, and school connectedness and their impact on adjustment. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 23(1), 115–140.  https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2012.19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee, V. E., & Burkam, D. T. (2003). Dropping out of high school: The role of school organization and structure. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 353–393.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040002353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee, V. E., Dedrick, R. F., & Smith, J. B. (1991). The effect of the social organization of schools on teachers’ efficacy and satisfaction. Sociology of Education, 64, 190–208.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2112851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1995). Effects of high school restructuring and size on early gains in achievement and engagement. Sociology of Education, 68(4), 241–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee, V. E. (2000). Using hierarchical linear modeling to study social contexts: The case of school effects. Educational Psychologist, 35(2), 125–141.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3502_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liew, J., Chen, Q., & Hughes, J. N. (2010). Child effortful control, teacher–student relationships, and achievement in academically at-risk children: Additive and interactive effects. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25(1), 51–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.07.005CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Moreira, P. A., Oliveira, J. T., Cloninger, K. M., Azevedo, C., Sousa, A., Castro, J., & Cloninger, C. R. (2012). The psychometrics and validity of the junior temperament and character inventory in Portuguese adolescents. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 53(8), 1227–1236.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.04.014CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Moreira, P. A. S., Cloninger, K., & Garcia, D. (2019). Person-centered schools. In D. Garcia, T. Archer & R.M. Kostrzewa (Eds.), Personality and Brain Disorders: Associations and Interventions. Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Moreira, P. A. S., & Dias, M. A. (2018). Tests of factorial structure and measurement invariance for the Student Engagement Instrument: Evidence from middle and high school students. International Journal of School and Educational Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2017.1414004
  36. Moreira, P. A. S., Dias, A., Matias, C., Castro, J., Gaspar, T., & Oliveira, J. (2018). School effects on students’ engagement with school: Academic performance moderates the effect of school support for learning on students’ engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.07.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moreira, P. A. S., Dias, P., Vaz, F. M., & Vaz, J. M. (2013). Predictors of academic performance and school engagement: Integrating persistence, motivation and study skills perspectives using person-centered and variable-centered approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 24(2), 117–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moreira, P. A. S., Dias, P. C., Vaz, F. M., Rocha, C., Monteiro, J., & Vaz, J. M. (2013). Escolas secundárias Portuguesas com melhores e piores resultados académicos: dimensões do aluno, da família e da escola [Portuguese secondary schools with best and worst academic performance indicators: Student, family and school dimensions]. Revista de Psicologia da Criança e do Adolescente/Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychology, 3(1), 81–121.Google Scholar
  39. Moreira, P. A. S., Oliveira, J. T., Dias, P., Vaz, F. M., & Torres-Oliveira, I. (2014). The students’ perceptions of school Success Promoting Strategies Inventory (SPSI): Development and validity evidence based studies. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17, E61.  https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2014.62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Moreira, P. A. S., Vaz, F., Dias, P., & Petracchi, P. (2009). Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the School Engagement Instrument. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 24(4), 303–317.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573509346680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Murray, C. (2009). Parent and teacher relationships as predictors of school engagement and functioning among low-income urban youth. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 29(3), 376–404.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431608322940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Results: What Makes Schools Successful? Resources, Policies and Practices (Volume IV). PISA, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  43. Osher, D., Sprague, J., Weissberg, R. P., Axelrod, J., Keenan, S., Kendziora, K., & Zins, J. E. (2008). A comprehensive approach to promoting social, emotional, and academic growth in contemporary schools. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (Vol. 4, pp. 1263–1278). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  44. Pereira, M., & Reis, H. (2012). Diferenças regionais no desempenho dos alunos portugueses: evidência do Programa PISA da OCDE. Boletim Económico–Inverno–Banco de Portugal, (2), 59–83.Google Scholar
  45. Pereira, M. C., & Reis, H. (2014). Retenção escolar no ensino básico em Portugal: determinantes e impacto no desempenho dos estudantes. Boletim Económico–Inverno–Banco de Portugal, 63, 63–87.Google Scholar
  46. Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on Students’ School engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493–529.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rubie-Davies, C. M., Flint, A., & McDonald, L. G. (2012). Teacher beliefs, teacher characteristics, and school contextual factors: What are the relationships? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 270–288.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02025.xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Rudasill, K. M. (2011). Child temperament, teacher–child interactions, and teacher–child relationships: A longitudinal investigation from first to third grade. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 147–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rudasill, K. M., Reio, T. J., Stipanovic, N., & Taylor, J. E. (2010). A longitudinal study of student-teacher relationship quality, difficult temperament, and risky behavior from childhood to early adolescence. Journal of School Psychology, 48(5), 389–412.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2010.05.001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Schargel, F., & Smink, J. (2004). Helping students graduate: A strategic approach to dropout prevention. New York, NY: Routledge.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315854816Google Scholar
  51. Sanson, A., Hemphill, S. A., & Smart, D. (2004). Connections between temperament and social development: A review. Social Development, 13, 142–170.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9507.2004.00261.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schildkamp, K., Visscher, A. J., & Luyten, H. (2009). The effects of the use of a school self-evaluation instrument. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(1), 69–88.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450802605506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thoits, P. A. (2011). Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52, 145.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510395592CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Tulving, E. (1987). Multiple memory systems and consciousness. Human Neurobiology, 6(2), 67–80.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Valiente, C., Lemery-Chalfant, K., Swanson, J., & Reiser, M. (2008). Prediction of Children’s academic competence from their effortful control, relationships, and classroom participation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 67–77.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Van Ryzin, M. J., Gravely, A. A., & Roseth, C. J. (2009). Autonomy, belongingness, and engagement in school as contributors to adolescent psychological well-being. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Van Maele, D., & Van Houtte, M. (2011). The quality of school life: Teacher-student trust relationships and the organizational school context. Social Indicators Research, 100(1), 85–100.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9605-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Virtaten, T., Moreira, P. A. S., Andersson, H., Ulvseth, H., Tetler, S., & Kuorelahti, M. (2017). Analyzing measurement invariance of the students’ engagement inventory brief version: The cases of Denmark, Finland and Portugal. Canadian Journal of Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573517699333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang, M.-T., Brinkworth, M. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). The moderation effect of teacherestudent relationship on the association between adolescents’ selfregulation ability, family conflict, and developmental problems. Developmental Psychology, 49, 690–705.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang, M.-T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wang, M.-T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Development, 83(3), 877–895.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01745.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Waters, S., Cross, D., & Shaw, T. (2010a). Does the nature of schools matter? An exploration of selected school ecology factors on adolescent perceptions of school connectedness. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 381–402.  https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X484479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Waters, S. K., Cross, D., & Shaw, T. (2010b). How important are school and interpersonal student characteristics in determining later adolescent school connectedness, by school sector? Australian Journal of Education, 54(2), 223–243.  https://doi.org/10.1177/000494411005400207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Woolley, M. E., Kol, K. L., & Bowen, G. L. (2009). The social context of school success for latino middle school students. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 29(1), 43–70.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431608324478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Chipuer, H. M., Hanisch, M., Creed, P. A., & McGregor, L. (2006). Relationships at school and stage-environment fit as resources for adolescent engagement and achievement. Journal of Adolescence, 29(6), 911–933.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.04.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paulo A. S. Moreira
    • 1
    Email author
  • Diana Cunha
    • 1
  • Richard Inman
    • 1
  • Joana Oliveira
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação, Universidade Lusíada Norte (Porto), Centro de Investigação em Psicologia para o Desenvolvimento (CIPD)PortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations