Intelligence, Problem Solving, and Creativity
In this chapter, notions of psychometric intelligence and cognitive psychology were used to analyze individual differences in the ability to execute cognitive processes. Specifically, the performance of good and poor problem solvers through the analysis of the types of errors in the SPM test were studied. Additionally, the relationship between creativity and intelligence was analyzed in middle-low and high cognitive performers.
KeywordsIntelligence Problem solving Creativity Type of errors
- Anderson, J.R. (1990). Cognitive psychology and its implications (3rd ed.). New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
- Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Sommer, M., Arendasy, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: The common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity. Intelligence, 46, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.007 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Butcher, H. J. (1968). Human intelligence—Its nature and assessment. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
- Chuderski, A. (2015). Why people fail on the fluid intelligence tests. Journal of Individual Differences, 36(3), 138–149. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1027/1614-0001/a000164 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Greeno, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1988). Problem solving and reasoning. In R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey, & R. D. Luce (Eds.), Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology, Learning and cognition (Vol. 2, 2nd ed., pp. 589–672). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Jauk, E., Benedek, M., Dunst, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by menos of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence, 41, 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.03.003 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Kunda, M., Soulières, I., Rozga, A. & Goel, A.K. (2013). Methods for classifying errors on the Raven’s standard progressive matrices test. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (COGSCI’13), pp. 2796–2801 Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a78a/8ab8b0b887a59d03bae2ff83b9079794ee93.pdf.
- Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (2000). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Section 3: The standard progressive matrices. Oxford, England: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Richards, R. (2007). Everyday creativity: Our hidden potential. In R. Richards (Ed.), Everyday creativity and new views of human nature (pp. 25–45). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Vosniadou, S. (1988). Analogical reasoning as a mechanism in knowledge acquisition: A developmental perspective. Center for the Study of Reading. Technical Report, n. 438. University of Illinois. Retrieved from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/18000/ctrstreadtechrepv01988i00438_opt.pdf?sequence=1.