Advertisement

The Validity and Reliability of the Individualised Care Scale

  • Minna Stolt
  • Janika Koskenvuori
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter analyses the psychometric properties of the Individualised Care Scale (ICS). As the scale has been translated into several languages, a wide international perspective to the validity and reliability of the ICS will be provided. The main contents are content, construct, criterion and cross-cultural validity, internal consistency (stability) and item functioning.

Keywords

Individualised Care Scale Validity Reliability Psychometric testing 

References

  1. 1.
    Waltz CF, Strickland OR, Lenz ER. Measurement in nursing and health research. 5th ed. New York: Springer; 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    DeVon HA, Block ME, Moyle-Wright P, et al. A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(2):155–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research. Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Suhonen R, Leino-Kilpi H, Välimäki M. Development and psychometric properties of the individualized care scale. J Eval Clin Pract. 2005;11(1):7–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Amaral A, Ferreira P, Suhonen R. Translation and validation of the individualized care scale. Int J Caring Sci. 2014;7(1):90–101.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berg A, Suhonen R, Idvall E. A survey of orthopaedic patients’ assessment of care using the individualised care scale. J Orthop Nurs. 2007;11(3):185–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Petroz U, Kennedy D, Webster F, et al. Patients’ perceptions of individualized care: evaluating psychometric properties and results of the individualized care scale. Can J Nurs Res. 2011;43(1):80–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Suhonen R, Välimäki M, Leino-Kilpi H, et al. Testing the individualized care model. Scand J Caring Sci. 2004;18(1):27–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Suhonen R, Välimäki M, Katajisto J, et al. Provision of individualised care improves hospital patient outcomes: an explanatory model using LISREL. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44(2):197–207.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Suhonen R, Schmidt LA, Radwin L. Measuring individualized nursing care: assessment of reliability and validity of three scales. J Adv Nurs. 2007;59(1):77–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Suhonen R, Gustafsson ML, Katajisto J, et al. Individualized care scale - nurse version: a Finnish validation study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16(1):145–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Suhonen R, Berg A, Idvall E, et al. Adapting the individualized care scale for cross-cultural comparison. Scand J Caring Sci. 2010;24(2):392–403.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Suhonen R, Efstathiou G, Tsangari H, et al. Patients’ and nurses’ perceptions of individualised care: an international comparative study. J Clin Nurs. 2011;21(7–8):1155–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Suhonen R, Alikleemola P, Katajisto J, et al. Nurses’ assessments of individualised care in long-term care institutions. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21(7–8):1178–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Charalambous A, Chappell NL, Katajisto J, et al. The conceptualization and measurement of individualized care. Geriatr Nurs. 2012;33(1):17–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Köberich S, Suhonen R, Feuchtinger J, et al. The German version of the individualized care scale - assessing validity and reliability. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;23:483–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rasooli A, Zamanzadeh V, Rahmani A, et al. Patients’ point of view about nurses’ support of individualized nursing care in training hospitals affiliated with Tabriz university of medical sciences. J Caring Sci. 2013;2(3):203–9.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rovetta F, Giordano A, Manara DF. The measurement of individualized care: translation and validation semantics of individualized care scale. Prof Inferm. 2012;65:39–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Amaral A, Fereira PL, Cardoso ML, et al. Implementation of the nursing role effectiveness model. Int J Caring Sci. 2014;7(7):757–70.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Berg A, Idvall E, Katajisto J, et al. A comparison between orthopaedic nurses’ and patients’ perception of individualised care. Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2012;16(3):136–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Acaroglu R, Suhonen R, Sendir M, et al. Reliability and validity of Turkish version of the individualised care scale. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(1):136–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Suhonen R, Välimäki M, Katajisto J. Developing and testing an instrument for the measurement of individual care. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32(5):1253–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bannigan K, Watson R. Reliability and validity in a nutshell. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(11–12):3237–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Soeken KL. Validity of measures. In: Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER, editors. Measurement in nursing and health research. 5th ed. New York: Springer; 2017. p. 209–60.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Davis AE. Instrument development: getting started. J Neurosci Nurs. 1996;28(3):204–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Köberich S, Feuchtinger J, Farin E. Factors influencing hospitalized patients perception of individualized nursing care - a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2016;15:14.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-016-0137-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Charalambous A, Radwin L, Berg A, et al. An international study of hospitalized cancer patients’ health status, nursing care quality, perceived individuality in care and trust in nurses: a path analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;61(1):176–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Suhonen R, Välimäki M, Berg A, et al. The impact of patient characteristics on orthopaedic and trauma patients’ perceptions of individualised nursing care. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2010;8(4):259–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Suhonen R, Välimäki M, Katajisto J, et al. Patient characteristics in relation to perceptions of how individualized care is delivered-research into the sensitivity of the individualized care scale. J Prof Nurs. 2006;22(4):253–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Suhonen R, Charalambous A, Berg A, et al. Hospitalised cancer patients’ perceptions of individualised nursing care in four European countries. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018;27(1):1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Suhonen R, Schmidt LA, Katajisto J, et al. Cross-cultural validity of the individualised care scale - a Rasch model analysis. J Clin Nurs. 2013;22(5–6):648–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model. Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. New York: Routledge; 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Campbell DT, Fiske DW. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Pscyhol Bull. 1959;56(1):81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hays RD, Hayashi T. Beyond internal consistency reliability: rationale and user’s guide for multitrait scaling analysis program on the microcomputer. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1990;22(2):167–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Suhonen R, Välimäki M, Katajisto J, et al. Hospitals’ organizational variables and patients’ perceptions of individualized nursing care in Finland. J Nurs Manag. 2007;15(2):197–206.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Papastavrou E, Acaroglu R, Sendir M, et al. The relationship between individualized care and the practice environment: an international study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(1):121–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gurdogan E, Findik U, Arslan B. Patients’ perception of individualized care and satisfaction with nursing care levels in Turkey. Int J Caring Sci. 2015;8(2):369–75.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Suhonen R, Papastavrou E, Efstathiou G, et al. Nurses’ perceptions of individualized care: an international comparison. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67(9):1895–907.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yang I. Individualized care, satisfaction with nursing care and health-related quality of life-focusing on heart disease. J Women’s Health. 2008;9(1):37–56.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rose PM. Individualized care in the radiation oncology setting from the patients’ and nurses’ perspectives. Cancer Nurs. 2016;39(5):411–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Charalambous A, Katajisto J, Valimaki M, et al. Individualised care and the professional practice environment: nurses’ perceptions. Int Nurs Rev. 2010;57(4):500–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Makkonen A, Hupli M, Suhonen R. Potilaiden näkemys hoidon yksilöllisyydestä ajanvaraspoliklinikalla. Hoitotiede. 2010;22(2):129–40.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rodríguez-Martín B, Stolt M, Katajisto J, et al. Nurses’ characteristics and organisational factors associated with their assessments of individualised care in care institutions for older people. Scand J Caring Sci. 2016;30(2):250–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Suhonen R, Välimäki M, Leino-Kilpi H. Individualized care, quality of life and satisfaction with nursing care. J Adv Nurs. 2005;50(3):283–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Suhonen R, Gustafsson ML, Katajisto J, et al. Nurses’ perceptions of individualized care. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66(5):1035–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Suhonen R, Stolt M, Puro M, et al. Individuality in older people’s care - challenges for the development of nursing and nursing management. J Nurs Manag. 2011;19(7):883–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Suhonen R, Charalambous A, Stolt M, et al. Caregivers’ work satisfaction and individualised care in care settings for older people. J Clin Nurs. 2013;22(3–4):479–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Suhonen R, Tsangari H, Leino-Kilpi H, et al. Individualised care - comparison of patients’ and nurses’ assessments. Hoitotiede. 2013;25(2):80–91.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Suhonen R, Stolt M, Gustafsson ML, et al. The associations among the ethical climate, the professional practice environment and individualized care in care settings for older people. J Adv Nurs. 2014;70(6):1356–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Suhonen R, Leino-Kilpi H. Older orthopaedic patients’ perceptions of individualised care: a comparative survey. Int J Older People Nursing. 2012;7(2):105–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Berg A, Rask M. Patienternas syn på individualiserad vård på en ortopedisk klinik. Collaborative and integrated approaches to health. Kristianstad: Forskningsplattformen för utveckling av närsjukvård; 2008. p. 25.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Nygårdh A, Malm D, Wikby K, et al. Empowerment intervention in outpatient care of persons with chronic kidney disease pre-dialysis. Nephrol Nurs J. 2012;39(4):285–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Tekin F, Findik UY. Level of perception of individualized care and satisfaction with nursing in orthopaedic surgery patients. Orthop Nurs. 2015;34(6):371–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ceylan B, Eser I. Assessment of individualized nursing care in hospitalized patients in a university hospital in Turkey. J Nurs Manag. 2016;24(7):954–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Land L, Suhonen R. Orthopaedic and trauma patients’ perceptions of individualized care. Int Nurs Rev. 2009;56(1):131–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Suhonen R, Välimäki M, Katajisto J. Individualized care in a Finnish healthcare organization. J Clin Nurs. 2000;9(2):218–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ferketich S. Focus on psychometrics. Aspects of item analysis. Res Nurs Health. 1991;14(2):165–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Nursing ScienceUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations