Advertisement

The Views of Trainee Substitute Teachers on Organizational Socialization (İstanbul Sample)

  • Elife Doğan KılıçEmail author
  • Nayil Kılıç
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the views of prospective teachers in Istanbul who work as a substitute teacher on socialization in terms of gender. The study group of this research consists of trainees who work as a substitute teacher in schools bound to Istanbul Provincial Directorate of National Education and who receive initial teacher training in Hasan Ali Yücel Educational Faculty in February, 2017. Fifty trainees attended the research. The percentages of participants in terms of gender are 52% and 48% for female and male prospective teachers, respectively. Socialization scale, which took place in the study of Yussuf Aliyev called “The Relationship Between the Organizational Socialization and Organizational Identification: A Research,” was used as a data collection tool. The data collected were analyzed with SPSS 21. T-test was used in analysis, and the data were interpreted according to these results.

Keywords

Substitute teachers Initial teacher education Organizational socialization 

References

  1. Aliyev, Y. (2014). Örgütsel Sosyalleşme Ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Arasındaki İlişki: Bir Araştırma. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 37(2), 131–149.Google Scholar
  2. Balcı, A. (2003). Örgütsel sosyalleşme. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.Google Scholar
  3. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı (12.Basım). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.Google Scholar
  4. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th Edition, SAGE Publications, Inc., London.Google Scholar
  5. Güçlü, N. (2004). Öğretmenlik Mesleğine Başlarken Yeni Öğretmenlerin Örgütsel Sosyalleşmeleri. In Şule Erçetin (Ed.), İlk Günden Başöğretmenliğe. Ankara: Asil Dağıtım.Google Scholar
  6. Kuşdemir, Y. (2005). İlköğretim Okulu Müdürlerinin Öğretmenlerin Örgütsel Sosyalleşme Sürecinde Sosyalleştirme Stratejilerini Kullanma Becerileri (Kırıkkale İli Örneği), Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kırıkkale: Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.Google Scholar
  7. Memduhoğlu, H. B. (2008). Örgütsel Sosyalleşme Ve Türk Eğitim Sisteminde Örgütsel Sosyalleşme Süreci. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 137–153. http://efdergi.yyu.edu.tr erişim tarihi 15.12.2017.Google Scholar
  8. Taormina, R. J. (1994). The organizational socialization inventory. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2, 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Taormina, R. J. (2004). Convergent validation of two measures of organizational socialization. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(1), 76–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Tokgöz, E. & Seymen Aytemiz, O. (2013). Örgütsel Güven, Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Arasındaki İlişki: Bir Devlet Hastanesinde Araştırma (pp. 61–76). http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/165796 erişim tarihi 15.12.2017.
  11. Zonana, M. (2011). İş Stresinin İşgörenlerin Örgütsel Sosyalleşme Düzeylerine Etkileri ve Bir Araştırma. In Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Istanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.İstanbul UniversityİstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations