Advertisement

Complexity in Management: Problems and Strategies

  • İlknur Maya
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)

Abstract

In this research, it aims to determine the issues which mid-level managers meet in the context of complexity theory and how they manage them with the strategies in the management of educational institutions. In addition, Çanakkale Provincial Directorate of National Education is analysed as a selected education organisation in the light of complexity theory. In the study, the interview method was used. The working group constitutes a total of ten education administrators working in Çanakkale Provincial Directorate of National Education. The data, given in the research, were written by the researcher in the direction of the sub-problems of the research. These data are grouped according to the theme determined in the direction of the subordinate problems. In the analysis of the data, inductive analysis technique, one type of content analysis, was applied. According to the education administrators, the institution demonstrates the open system feature. In this context, environment (parent, press, public opinion) dimension, student input dimension and output/result dimension are leading issues. The issues that education administrators see most important in the planning, implementation and supervision dimensions of the institution are behaviours showing resistance to change, lack of communication, confusion of decision-makers and repressive behaviour of the local press. In addition, the lack of sufficient and qualified personnel is also a problem. Educational administrators state that the system is chain-bound and that it is not always possible for the institution to be in balance.

Keywords

Management Educational organisations Problems Strategies 

References

  1. Boal, K., & Hooijberg, R. (2001). Strategic leadership research: Moving on. Leadership Quarterly Yearly Review of Leadership, 11(4), 515–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonabeau, E., & Meyer, C. (2001). Swarm intelligence: A whole new way to think about business. Harvard Business Review, 79(5), 106–114.Google Scholar
  3. Fenwick, T. (2008). Responsibility, complexity science and education: Dilemmas and uncertain responses. Studies in Philosophical Education, 28, 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Galbraith, P. (2004). Chaos mini-theme. Organisational leadership and chaos theory. Let’s be careful. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(1), 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gilstrap, D. L. (2005). Strange attractors and human interaction: Leading complex organizations through the use of metaphors. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 2(1), 55–69.Google Scholar
  6. Knowles, R. N. (2001). Self-organizing leadership: A way of seeing what is happening in organizations and pathway to coherence. Emergence, 3(4), 112–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Maguire, S., & McKelvey, B. (1999). Complexity and management: Moving from fad to firm foundation. Emergence, 1(2), 19–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Marion, R. (1999). The edge of organization: Chaos and complexity theories of formal social organizations. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Marion, R., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2001). Leadership in complex organizations. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(4), 389–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McClellan, J. L. (2010). Leadership and complexity: Implications for practice within the advisement leadership bodies at colleges and universities. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 7(2), 32–51.Google Scholar
  11. Osborn, R. N., & Hunt, J. G. (2007). Leadership and the choice of order: Complexity and hierarchical perspectives near the edge of chaos. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Plowman, D. A., Solanosky, S., Beck, T. E., Baker, L., Kulkarni, M., & Travis, D. V. (2007). The role of leadership in emergent, self-organization. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Prigogine, I. (1997). The end of certainty. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  14. Regine, B., & Lewin, R. (2000). Leading at the edge: How leaders influence complex systems. Emergence: A Journal of Complexity Issues in Organizations and Management, 2(2), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  16. Schneider, M., & Somers, M. (2006). Organizations as complex adaptive systems: Implications of complexity theory for leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Svyantek, D. J., & Brown, L. L. (2000). A complex systems approach to organizations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(2), 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organization (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • İlknur Maya
    • 1
  1. 1.Çanakkale 18 Mart UniversityÇanakkaleTurkey

Personalised recommendations