Advertisement

Chimerism pp 51-63 | Cite as

Relationship Testing and Forensics

  • Kayla Sheets
  • Robert Wenk
Chapter

Abstract

Despite having two unique genomes, most congenital chimera manifest no outward signs or symptoms of the condition and remain undiagnosed throughout their lives. Undiagnosed chimerism confounds gold standard molecular forensic and relationship tests. In forensics, observing only one of two genomes from congenital or acquired chimerism may cause mismatches between evidence and reference samples, leading to wrongful convictions or exonerations. In relationship testing, false exclusions of paternity and maternity have been documented. Cases of false parentage exclusions have resulted in loss of child custody. Possible financial losses include loss of child support and loss of inheritances. Immigration opportunities for families may be lost when the DNA tests do not confirm declared relationships. Greater analytical sensitivity of newer molecular tests should improve detection of chimerism, but errors due to tissue sampling limitations will continue to be problematic. Studies of chimerism are needed to determine the condition’s prevalence and the tissues that most frequently manifest both genomes.

Keywords

Parental DNA testing Molecular forensic testing Chimerism Microchimerism DNA testing recommendations 

References

  1. 1.
    Boklage CE. Embryogenesis of chimeras, twins and anterior midline asymmetries. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(3):579–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nylander PP. The factors that influence twinning rates. Acta Genet Med Gemellol. 1981;30(3):189–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boklage CE. Chapter 4: The frequency and survivability of natural twin conceptions. In: Multiple Pregnancy: Epidemiology, Gestation and Perinatal Outcome [Internet]. 1st ed. New York: Taylor and Francis Group. p. 41–2, 49. Available from: https://www.lehmanns.de/shop/medizin-pharmazie/583671-9781850706663-multiple-pregnancy.
  4. 4.
    Jacewicz R, Lewandowski K, Rupa-matysek J, Jedrzejczyk M, Komarnicki M, Berent J. Genetic investigation of biological materials from patients after stem cell transplantation based on autosomal as well as Y-chromosomal markers. Int J Leg Med. 2013;127(2):359–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Butler J. Fundamentals of forensic DNA typing - 1st Edition [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2017 Jul 11]. 520 p. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/books/fundamentals-of-forensic-dna-typing/butler/978-0-12-374999-4.
  6. 6.
    Verdiani S, Bonsignore A, Casarino L, Ferrari GM, Zia SC, De Stefano F. An unusual observation of tetragametic chimerism: forensic aspects. Int J Legal Med. 2009;123(5):431–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aldhous P. Bone marrow donors risk DNA identity mix-up [Internet]. New Scientist. 2005 [cited 2017 Jul 11]. Available from: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18825234-600-bone-marrow-donors-risk-dna-identity-mix-up/.
  8. 8.
    Krimski S, Simoncelli T. Genetic justice: DNA data banks, criminal investigations, and civil liberties. [Internet]. Columbia; 2011 [cited 2017 Jul 12]. Available from: https://www.amazon.com/Genetic-Justice-Criminal-Investigations-Liberties/dp/0231145217.
  9. 9.
    Kayle DH. Chimeric criminals. Minn J Sci Tech. 2012;14(1):11.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Murphy E. Inside the cell: the dark side of forensic DNA. [Internet]. Nation Books; 2015 [cited 2017 Jul 12]. Available from: https://www.amazon.com/Inside-Cell-Dark-Side-Forensic/dp/1568584695/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1499869994&sr=1-1&keywords=inside+the+cell.
  11. 11.
    Yu N, Krushall M, Yunis J. Disputed maternity leading to identification of tetragametic chimerism. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1545–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Singh G, Johns MM, Paul G. Paternity testing: analysis of six blood groups and HLA markers, with particular reference to comparison of races. Am J Clin Pathol. 1982;78(5):748–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sheets KM, Baird ML, Heinig J, Davis D, Sabatini M, Barry Starr D. A case of chimerism-induced paternity confusion: what ART practitioners can do to prevent future calamity for families. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(2):345–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wenk RE, Davis D. Paternity probabilities when a child is a congenital chimera. Transfusion. 2017;57(11):2814–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vibrant Gene Consulting, LLCCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Genetic Counseling Board of Registration, Commonwealth of MassachusettsBostonUSA
  3. 3.Relationship Testing Accreditation Program Unit, AABBBethesdaUSA
  4. 4.PathologyPennsylvania State UniversityState CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations