Advertisement

Assessment of Psychosocial Contributions to Disability

  • Daniel Bruns
  • Pamela A. Warren
Chapter

Abstract

Disability has traditionally been defined in terms of a largely biomedical model, where an individual’s limitations were seen as being the product of objectively verifiable physical problems. More recently though, disability has been redefined in terms of functionality within a social context. Thus, disability is best understood as a biopsychosocial phenomenon that combines biological, psychological, and social elements. Biopsychosocial assessment has inherent difficulties. Patients may lack insight into their psychological status and thus be unable to answer certain questions. Further, even if patients do have adequate insight, they may be motivated somehow to bias their reports of information. One method to overcome these challenges is the use of standardized psychometric measures that include validity assessment. Disability has traditionally been defined in biomedical terms and closely associated with objective physical impairment (Pledger, Am Psychol 58:279–284, 2003). More recent conceptualizations though hold that a comprehensive evaluation of disability requires not only the assessment of objective physical impairment but also an assessment of the psychosocial context in which the disability occurs. This conceptualization changed due to findings such as Ormel’s global study of 26,000 patients in 14 countries, which examined the origins of disability. The study determined that psychological factors were more predictive of physical disability than was disease severity (Ormel et al., JAMA 272:1741–1748, 1994).

Even when medical disorders are not present, psychological disorders can be disabling. According to the World Health Organization, mental health disorders are the most disabling of all conditions, accounting for 31% of the world’s disability (Mnookin, World Bank Group, & World Health Organization, Out of the shadows: Making mental health a global development priority. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2016; World Health Organization, Global Health Estimates 2015: Disease burden by Cause, Age, Sex, by Country and by Region, 2000–2015. Retrieved from Geneva: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/estimates/en/index2.html, 2016). Among mental health disorders, depression is the most disabling single condition in the world, accounting for 7.5% of the world’s disability, while anxiety accounts for an additional 3.4% (World Health Organization, Global Health Estimates 2015: Disease burden by Cause, Age, Sex, by Country and by Region, 2000–2015. Retrieved from Geneva: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/estimates/en/index2.html, 2016).

Among SSDI recipients in the United States, more than half have a disability involving psychological or subjective symptoms (especially pain, as pain disorders are a psychological condition), with 33% of SSDI recipients in 2010 having psychological disorders (up from 22% in 1986) and 28% suffering from painful musculoskeletal disorders (Congressional Budget Office, Policy Options for the Social Security Disability Insurance Program. Retrieved from http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/43421-DisabilityInsurance_screen.pdf, 2012). These patients tend to gain disability status earlier in life, and stay on SSDI longer, because psychological and musculoskeletal conditions are less likely to be fatal.

Some psychosocial risk factors for disability such as socioeconomic status are objective in nature. In contrast, other psychosocial risk factors, such as depression, are determined to a large extent by the report of subjective states. To assess these subjective states, standardized psychological tests can play a valuable role. The defining characteristics of standardized psychological tests are discussed, as are their uses. Commonly used psychological tests are reviewed. Practical questions are also addressed, such as when to administer psychological tests, what psychosocial risk factors need to be assessed, what tests to use, methods of quantifying the level of psychosocial risk, and the detection of faking.

References

  1. American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. (2008a). Occupational medicine practice guidelines (2nd Revised ed.). Beverly Farms, MA: OEM Press.Google Scholar
  2. American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. (2008b). Chronic pain treatment guidelines. In K. Hegmann (Ed.), Occupational medicine practice guidelines (2nd ed.). Beverly Farms, MA: OEM Press.Google Scholar
  3. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (U.S.). (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  4. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders : DSM-5 (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. American Psychiatric Association. Task Force on DSM-IV. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders : DSM-IV-TR (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  6. Arbisi, P. A., & Butcher, J. N. (2004). Psychometric perspectives on detection of malingering of pain: Use of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 20(6), 383–391.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aronoff, G. M., & Livengood, J. M. (2003). Pain: Psychiatric aspects of impairment and disability. Current Pain and Headache Reports, 7(2), 105–115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Aronoff, G. M., Mandel, S., Genovese, E., et al. (2007). Evaluating malingering in contested injury or illness. Pain Practice, 7(2), 178–204.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Artiola i Fortuny, L., & Mullaney, H. A. (1997). Neuropsychology with Spanish speakers: Language use and proficiency issues for test development. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 19(4), 615–622.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barsky, A. J., & Borus, J. F. (1995). Somatization and medicalization in the era of managed care. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 274(24), 1931–1934.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2008). MMPI-2-RF™ manual. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  12. Bernard Jr., T. N. (1993). Repeat lumbar spine surgery. Factors influencing outcome. Spine, 18(15), 2196–2200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bianchini, K. J., Curtis, K. L., & Greve, K. W. (2006). Compensation and malingering in traumatic brain injury: A dose-response relationship? The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20(4), 831–847.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Binder, L. M., & Rohling, M. L. (1996). Money matters: A meta-analytic review of the effects of financial incentives on recovery after closed-head injury. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 153(1), 7–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Block, A. R., Gatchel, R. J., Deardorff, W. W., & Guyer, R. D. (2003). The psychology of spine surgery. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Block, A. R., Ohnmeiss, D. D., Guyer, R. D., Rashbaum, R. F., & Hochschuler, S. H. (2001). The use of presurgical psychological screening to predict the outcome of spine surgery. The Spine Journal, 1(4), 274–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Boersma, K., & Linton, S. J. (2005). Screening to identify patients at risk: Profiles of psychological risk factors for early intervention. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 21(1), 38–43. Discussion 69–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bornstein, B. H., Whisenhunt, B. L., Nemeth, R. J., & Dunaway, D. L. (2002). Pretrial publicity and civil cases: A two-way street? Law and Human Behavior, 26(1), 3–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bruns, D., & Disorbio, J. M. (1996). Battery for Health Improvement Manual. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.Google Scholar
  20. Bruns, D., & Disorbio, J. M. (2003). Battery for health improvement 2 manual. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.Google Scholar
  21. Bruns, D., & Disorbio, J. M. (2005). Chronic pain and biopsychosocial disorders: The BHI 2 approach to classification and assessment. Practical Pain Management, 5(7), 52–61.Google Scholar
  22. Bruns, D., & Disorbio, J. M. (2009). Assessment of biopsychosocial risk factors for medical treatment: A collaborative approach. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 16(2), 127–147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bruns, D., & Disorbio, J. M. (2014). The psychological evaluation of patients with chronic pain: A review of BHI 2 clinical and forensic interpretive considerations. Psychological Injury and Law, 7(4), 335–361.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-014-9206-y CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Bruns, D., & Disorbio, J. M. (2015). The psychological assessment of patients with chronic pain. In T. R. Deer, M. S. Leong, & A. L. Ray (Eds.), Treatment of chronic pain by integrative approaches: The American Academy of Pain Medicine textbook on patient management (pp. xix, 325 pages). New York/Heidelberg/Dordrecht/London: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Bruns, D., Mueller, K., & Warren, P. A. (2012). Biopsychosocial law, health care reform, and the control of medical inflation in Colorado. Rehabilitation Psychology, 57(2), 81–97.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028623 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Burchiel, K. J., Anderson, V. C., Brown, F. D., et al. (1996). Prospective, multicenter study of spinal cord stimulation for relief of chronic back and extremity pain. Spine, 21(23), 2786–2794.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Burton, A. K., Tillotson, K. M., Main, C. J., & Hollis, S. (1995). Psychosocial predictors of outcome in acute and subchronic low back trouble. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 20(6), 722–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Butcher, J. N., Arbisi, P. A., Atlis, M. M., & McNulty, J. L. (2003). The construct validity of the Lees-Haley Fake Bad Scale. Does this scale measure somatic malingering and feigned emotional distress? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18(5), 473–485.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Butcher, J. N., Hamilton, C. K., Rouse, S. V., & Cumella, E. J. (2006). The deconstruction of the Hy Scale of MMPI-2: Failure of RC3 in measuring somatic symptom expression. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87(2), 186–192.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Butler, R. J., & Johnson, W. G. (2008). Satisfaction with low back pain care. The Spine Journal, 8(3), 510–521.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Butler, R. J., Johnson, W. G., & Gray, B. P. (2007). Timing makes a difference: Early nurse case management intervention and low back pain. Professional Case Management, 12(6), 316–327. Quiz 328–319.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Campbell, L. C., Clauw, D. J., & Keefe, F. J. (2003). Persistent pain and depression: A biopsychosocial perspective. Biological Psychiatry, 54(3), 399–409.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Carragee, E. J., Alamin, T. F., Miller, J. L., & Carragee, J. M. (2005). Discographic, MRI and psychosocial determinants of low back pain disability and remission: A prospective study in subjects with benign persistent back pain. The Spine Journal, 5(1), 24–35.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Carragee, E. J., Barcohana, B., Alamin, T., & van den Haak, E. (2004). Prospective controlled study of the development of lower back pain in previously asymptomatic subjects undergoing experimental discography. Spine, 29(10), 1112–1117.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Chiu, T. T., Lam, T. H., & Hedley, A. J. (2005). Correlation among physical impairments, pain, disability, and patient satisfaction in patients with chronic neck pain. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86(3), 534–540.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Chou, R., Baisden, J., Carragee, E. J., Resnick, D. K., Shaffer, W. O., & Loeser, J. D. (2009). Surgery for low back pain: A review of the evidence for an American pain society clinical practice guideline. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 34(10), 1094–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Colorado Division of Workers’ Compensation. Chronic Pain Task Force. (2017). Rule 17, Exhibit 9: Chronic pain disorder medical treatment guidelines: Colorado Department of Labor and Employment: Division of Worker Compensation.Google Scholar
  38. Congressional Budget Office. (2012). Policy options for the Social Security Disability Insurance program. Retrieved from http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/43421-DisabilityInsurance_screen.pdf
  39. DeBerard, M. S., Masters, K. S., Colledge, A. L., & Holmes, E. B. (2003). Presurgical biopsychosocial variables predict medical and compensation costs of lumbar fusion in Utah workers’ compensation patients. The Spine Journal, 3(6), 420–429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. den Boer, J. J., Oostendorp, R. A., Beems, T., Munneke, M., & Evers, A. W. (2006). Continued disability and pain after lumbar disc surgery: The role of cognitive-behavioral factors. Pain, 123(1–2), 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. den Boer, J. J., Oostendorp, R. A., Beems, T., Munneke, M., Oerlemans, M., & Evers, A. W. (2006). A systematic review of bio-psychosocial risk factors for an unfavourable outcome after lumbar disc surgery. European Spine Journal, 15(5), 527–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Deyo, R. A., Mirza, S. K., Heagerty, P. J., Turner, J. A., & Martin, B. I. (2005). A prospective cohort study of surgical treatment for back pain with degenerated discs; study protocol. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 6(1), 24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Disorbio, J. M., & Bruns, D. (2002). Brief battery for health improvement 2 manual. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.Google Scholar
  44. Disorbio, J. M., Bruns, D., & Barolat, G. (2006). Assessment and treatment of chronic pain: A physician’s guide to a biopsychosocial approach. Practical Pain Management, 6(2), 11–27.Google Scholar
  45. Dworkin, R. H., Turk, D. C., Farrar, J. T., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Jensen, M. P., Katz, N. P., et al. (2005). Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain, 113(1–2), 9–19.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Epker, J., & Block, A. R. (2001). Presurgical psychological screening in back pain patients: A review. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 17(3), 200–205.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Fairbank, J. C., & Pynsent, P. B. (2000). The oswestry disability index. Spine, 25(22), 2940–2952. Discussion 2952.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Fejer, R., & Hartvigsen, J. (2008). Neck pain and disability due to neck pain: What is the relation? European Spine Journal, 17(1), 80–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Fishbain, D. A., Cutler, R., Rosomoff, H. L., & Rosomoff, R. S. (1997). Chronic pain-associated depression: Antecedent or consequence of chronic pain? A review. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 13(2), 116–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Fishbain, D. A., Cutler, R., Rosomoff, H. L., & Rosomoff, R. S. (1999). Chronic pain disability exaggeration/malingering and submaximal effort research. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 15(4), 244–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ford, C. V. (1986). The somatizing disorders. Psychosomatics, 27(5), 327–331. 335–327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Frederick, R. I., & Bowden, S. C. (2009). Evaluating constructs represented by symptom validity tests in forensic neuropsychological assessment of traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 24(2), 105–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Frederick, R. I., & Crosby, R. D. (2000). Development and validation of the validity indicator profile. Law and Human Behavior, 24(1), 59–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Frederick, R. I., Crosby, R. D., & Wynkoop, T. F. (2000). Performance curve classification of invalid responding on the validity indicator profile. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15(4), 281–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Frymoyer, J. W., & Cats-Baril, W. L. (1991). An overview of the incidences and costs of low back pain. The Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 22(2), 263–271.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Furr, R. M., & Bacharach, V. R. (2008). Psychometrics: An introduction. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  57. Gallagher, R. M. (2004). Biopsychosocial pain medicine and mind-brain-body science. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 15(4), 855–882. vii.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Gatchel, R. J. (2001). A biopsychosocial overview of pretreatment screening of patients with pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 17(3), 192–199.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Gatchel, R. J. (2004). Comorbidity of chronic pain and mental health disorders: The biopsychosocial perspective. The American Psychologist, 59(8), 795–805.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Gatchel, R. J., & Mayer, T. G. (2008). Psychological evaluation of the spine patient. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 16(2), 107–112.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Gatchel, R. J., Mayer, T. G., & Eddington, A. (2006). MMPI disability profile: The least known, most useful screen for psychopathology in chronic occupational spinal disorders. Spine, 31(25), 2973–2978.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Gatchel, R. J., Polatin, P. B., & Mayer, T. G. (1995). The dominant role of psychosocial risk factors in the development of chronic low back pain disability. Spine, 20(24), 2702–2709.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Gervais, R. O., Rohling, M. L., Green, P., & Ford, W. (2004). A comparison of WMT, CARB, and TOMM failure rates in non-head injury disability claimants. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19(4), 475–487.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Giordano, N., & Lofland, K. (2005a). A literature review of psychological predictors of spinal cord stimulator outcomes. The Journal of Pain, 6(3 Supplement), S67.Google Scholar
  65. Giordano, N., & Lofland, K. (2005b). A literature review of psychological predictors of spinal cord stimulator outcomes. American Pain Society 24th Annual Scientific Meeting, Boston.Google Scholar
  66. Glassman, S. D., Minkow, R. E., Dimar, J. R., Puno, R. M., Raque, G. H., & Johnson, J. R. (1998). Effect of prior lumbar discectomy on outcome of lumbar fusion: A prospective analysis using the SF-36 measure. Journal of Spinal Disorders, 11(5), 383–388.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Grace, V. M. (2000). Pitfalls of the medical paradigm in chronic pelvic pain. Baillière’s Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 14(3), 525–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Greene Jackson, D., Hamilton, P., Hutchinson, S., & Huber, J. (2009). The effect of patients’ race on provider treatment choices in coronary care: A literature review for model development. Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice, 10(1), 40–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Greenough, C. G., Taylor, L. J., & Fraser, R. D. (1994). Anterior lumbar fusion. A comparison of noncompensation patients with compensation patients. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 300, 30–37.Google Scholar
  70. Greiffenstein, M. F., Baker, W. J., & Johnson-Greene, D. (2002). Actual versus self-reported scholastic achievement of litigating postconcussion and severe closed head injury claimants. Psychological Assessment, 14(2), 202–208.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Groth-Marnat, G., & Fletcher, A. (2000). Influence of neuroticism, catastrophizing, pain duration, and receipt of compensation on short-term response to nerve block treatment for chronic back pain. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 23(4), 339–350.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Gureje, O. (2007). Psychiatric aspects of pain. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 20(1), 42–46.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Gureje, O. (2008). Comorbidity of pain and anxiety disorders. Current Psychiatry Reports, 10(4), 318–322.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Hagg, O., Fritzell, P., Ekselius, L., & Nordwall, A. (2003). Predictors of outcome in fusion surgery for chronic low back pain. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study. European Spine Journal, 12(1), 22–33.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Hall, R. C. (2007). Detection of malingered PTSD: An overview of clinical, psychometric, and physiological assessment: Where do we stand? Journal of Forensic Sciences, 52(3), 717–725.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Heckler, D. R., Gatchel, R. J., Lou, L., Whitworth, T., Bernstein, D., & Stowell, A. W. (2007). Presurgical Behavioral Medicine Evaluation (PBME) for implantable devices for pain management: A 1-year prospective study. Pain Practice, 7(2), 110–122.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Hegmann, K. (2017). Chronic pain guidelines. MDGuidelines®. Occupational medicine practice guidelines: Evaluation and Management of Common Health Problems and Functional Recovery in Workers. 3rd. Retrieved from www.mdguidelines.com
  78. Hyams, J. S. (2004). Irritable bowel syndrome, functional dyspepsia, and functional abdominal pain syndrome. Adolescent Medicine Clinics, 15(1), 1–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Iverson, G. L. (2007). Identifying exaggeration and malingering. Pain Practice, 7(2), 94–102.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Jensen, M. C., Brant-Zawadzki, M. N., Obuchowski, N., Modic, M. T., Malkasian, D., & Ross, J. S. (1994). Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. The New England Journal of Medicine, 331(2), 69–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Jette, A. M., & Badley, E. (2000). Conceptual issues in the measurement of work disability. In N. Mathiowetz & G. S. Wunderlich (Eds.), Survey measurement of work disability: Summary of a workshop (pp. 4–27). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  82. Kessler, R. C., Chiu, W. T., Demler, O., Merikangas, K. R., & Walters, E. E. (2005). Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National comorbidity survey replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 617–627.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Klekamp, J., McCarty, E., & Spengler, D. M. (1998). Results of elective lumbar discectomy for patients involved in the workers’ compensation system. Journal of Spinal Disorders, 11(4), 277–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Koch, H. (1986). The management of chronic pain in office-based ambulatory care: National ambulatory medical care survey. In NDPN (Ed.), Advance data from vital and health statistics (pp. 86–1250). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  85. Koho, P., Aho, S., Watson, P., & Hurri, H. (2001). Assessment of chronic pain behaviour: Reliability of the method and its relationship with perceived disability, physical impairment and function. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 33(3), 128–132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. LaCaille, R. A., DeBerard, M. S., Masters, K. S., Colledge, A. L., & Bacon, W. (2005). Presurgical biopsychosocial factors predict multidimensional patient: Outcomes of interbody cage lumbar fusion. The Spine Journal, 5(1), 71–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Lynch, W. J. (2004). Determination of effort level, exaggeration, and malingering in neurocognitive assessment. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 19(3), 277–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Lysgaard, A. P., Fonager, K., & Nielsen, C. V. (2005). Effect of financial compensation on vocational rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37(6), 388–391.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Mailis-Gagnon, A., Nicholson, K., Blumberger, D., & Zurowski, M. (2008). Characteristics and period prevalence of self-induced disorder in patients referred to a pain clinic with the diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 24(2), 176–185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Mannion, A. F., & Elfering, A. (2006). Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment. European Spine Journal, 15(Suppl 1), S93–108.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Mendelson, G., & Mendelson, D. (2004). Malingering pain in the medicolegal context. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 20(6), 423–432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., et al. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment. A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist, 56(2), 128–165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Mitrushina, M. N., Boone, K. B., & D’Elia, L. (1999). Handbook of normative data for neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Mittenberg, W., DiGiulio, D. V., Perrin, S., & Bass, A. E. (1992). Symptoms following mild head injury: Expectation as aetiology. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 55(3), 200–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Mittenberg, W., Patton, C., Canyock, E. M., & Condit, D. C. (2002). Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(8), 1094–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Mnookin, S., & World Bank Group, World Health Organization. (2016). Out of the shadows: Making mental health a global development priority. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  97. Murray, C. J., & Lopez, A. D. (1997). Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet, 349(9064), 1498–1504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Nelson, N. W., Sweet, J. J., Berry, D. T., Bryant, F. B., & Granacher, R. P. (2007). Response validity in forensic neuropsychology: Exploratory factor analytic evidence of distinct cognitive and psychological constructs. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13(3), 440–449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Nelson, N. W., Sweet, J. J., & Demakis, G. J. (2006). Meta-analysis of the MMPI-2 fake bad scale: Utility in forensic practice. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20(1), 39–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Ong, K. S., & Keng, S. B. (2003). The biological, social, and psychological relationship between depression and chronic pain. Cranio, 21(4), 286–294.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Ormel, J., VonKorff, M., Ustun, T. B., Pini, S., Korten, A., & Oldehinkel, T. (1994). Common mental disorders and disability across cultures. Results from the WHO Collaborative Study on Psychological Problems in General Health Care. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(22), 1741–1748.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Pickering, T. G. (2001). Mental stress as a causal factor in the development of hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Current Hypertension Reports, 3(3), 249–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Pledger, C. (2003). Discourse on disability and rehabilitation issues. Opportunities for psychology. The American Psychologist, 58(4), 279–284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Polatin, P. B., Kinney, R. K., Gatchel, R. J., Lillo, E., & Mayer, T. G. (1993). Psychiatric illness and chronic low-back pain. The mind and the spine–which goes first? Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 18(1), 66–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Proctor, T. J., Mayer, T. G., Gatchel, R. J., & McGeary, D. D. (2004). Unremitting health-care-utilization outcomes of tertiary rehabilitation of patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 86-A(1), 62–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Reagan, R. (2009). Remarks on signing the intermediate-range nuclear forces treaty, 1987. From http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/speeches/1987/120887c.htm. Accessed 13 Sep 2009.
  107. Rohling, M. L., Binder, L. M., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (1995). Money matters: A meta-analytic review of the association between financial compensation and the experience and treatment of chronic pain. Health Psychology, 14(6), 537–547.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Rondinelli, R. D., Genovese, E., Brigham, C. R., & American Medical Association. (2008). Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment (6th ed.). Chicago: American Medical Association.Google Scholar
  109. Roy-Byrne, P. P., Davidson, K. W., Kessler, R. C., et al. (2008). Anxiety disorders and comorbid medical illness. General Hospital Psychiatry, 30(3), 208–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Scarry, E. (1985). The body in pain: The making and unmaking of the world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  111. Schofferman, J., Anderson, D., Hines, R., Smith, G., & White, A. (1992). Childhood psychological trauma correlates with unsuccessful lumbar spine surgery. Spine, 17(6 Suppl), S138–S144.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  112. Spengler, D. M., Bigos, S. J., Martin, N. A., et al. (1986). Back injuries in industry: A retrospective study. I. Overview and cost analysis. Spine, 11(3), 241–245.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  113. Spitzer, W., Leblanc, F., & Dupuis, M. (1987). Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 12(7 Suppl), S1–59.Google Scholar
  114. Sullivan, M. J., Thorn, B., Haythornthwaite, J. A., et al. (2001). Theoretical perspectives on the relation between catastrophizing and pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 17(1), 52–64.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  115. Taylor, V. M., Deyo, R. A., Ciol, M., et al. (2000). Patient-oriented outcomes from low back surgery: A community-based study. Spine, 25(19), 2445–2452.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  116. Terplan, M., Smith, E. J., & Temkin, S. M. (2009). Race in ovarian cancer treatment and survival: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Cancer Causes & Control, 20(7), 1139–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Thomas, M. L., & Youngjohn, J. R. (2009). Let’s not get hysterical: Comparing the MMPI-2 validity, clinical, and RC scales in TBI litigants tested for effort. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(6), 1067–1084.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Tompa, E., de Oliveira, C., Dolinschi, R., & Irvin, E. (2008). A systematic review of disability management interventions with economic evaluations. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 18(1), 16–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Turk, D. C., & Melzack, R. (1992). Trends and future directions in human pain assessment. In D. C. Turk & R. Melzack (Eds.), Handbook of pain assessment (pp. 473–479). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  120. Turk, D. C., & Okifuji, A. (2002). Psychological factors in chronic pain: Evolution and revolution. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(3), 678–690.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Turner, S. M., DeMers, S. T., Fox, H. R., & Reed, G. (2001). APA’s guidelines for test user qualifications: An executive summary. The American Psychologist, 56, 1099–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. (2009). Long range plan: 1999–2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  123. Weisbord, S. D., Fried, L. F., Arnold, R. M., et al. (2004). Development of a symptom assessment instrument for chronic hemodialysis patients: The dialysis symptom index. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 27(3), 226–240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Wise, M. G., & Ford, C. V. (1999). Factitious disorders. Primary Care, 26(2), 315–326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Work Loss Data Institute. (2008). Official disability guidelines. Encinitas, CA: Work Loss Data Institute.Google Scholar
  126. Work Loss Data Institute. (2009). Official disability guidelines. Encinitas, CA: Work Loss Data Institute.Google Scholar
  127. World Health Organization. (2008). The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  128. World Health Organization. (2016). Global Health Estimates 2015: Disease burden by Cause, Age, Sex, by Country and by Region, 2000–2015. Retrieved from Geneva: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/estimates/en/index2.html
  129. Ylinen, J., Takala, E. P., Kautiainen, H., et al. (2004). Association of neck pain, disability and neck pain during maximal effort with neck muscle strength and range of movement in women with chronic non-specific neck pain. European Journal of Pain, 8(5), 473–478.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Health Psychology AssociatesGreeleyUSA
  2. 2.Carle Physician Group and University of Illinois Medical SchoolDepartment of PsychiatryMonticelloUSA

Personalised recommendations